2010-04-14 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 4,023 chars

SEC v. Gerald H. Levine; Marie A. Levine; Alan B. Copeland; and Nu Star Holdings, Inc., No. LR-21485, District of Nevada (Apr. 14, 2010) — Press Release

raw: Gerald Harold Levine, et al.

Gerald Harold Levine, et al., No. 2:07-CV-00506 (Apr. 14, 2010)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gerald Harold Levine, et al.
summary

Gerald H. Levine, Marie A. Levine, Alan B. Copeland, and Nu Star Holdings, Inc. were found guilty of securities fraud for selling Pink Sheets stocks to overseas investors through boiler rooms, ordered to pay $3,381,689 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and a $120,000 civil penalty.

paragraph

Gerald H. Levine, Marie A. Levine, Alan B. Copeland, and Nu Star Holdings, Inc. were accused of securities fraud for selling Pink Sheets stocks to overseas investors through boiler rooms in Barcelona, Spain and Santa Ana, California. The alleged fraud involved making material misrepresentations and omissions, including failing to disclose excessive commissions and the promoters' prior liability for fraud. The defendants were ordered to pay $3,381,689 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, as well as a $120,000 civil penalty.

narrative

Gerald H. Levine, Marie A. Levine, Alan B. Copeland, and Nu Star Holdings, Inc. were found guilty of securities fraud for selling Pink Sheets stocks to overseas investors through boiler rooms in Barcelona, Spain and Santa Ana, California. The alleged fraud involved making material misrepresentations and omissions, including failing to disclose excessive commissions and the promoters' prior liability for fraud. The defendants misled overseas investors by concealing prior fraud convictions, inflating stock value with fake research, hiding excessive commissions, and falsifying broker locations, violating Sections 10(b), 17(a), and 5 of federal securities laws. The court ordered them to pay $3,381,689 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, plus a $120,000 civil penalty. The Levines and Copeland were also barred from participating in penny stock offers and the Levines were barred from acting as officers or directors of publicly traded companies. The judgment followed the SEC’s successful motion for summary judgment, with prior settlements already reached against two other defendants in the case.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
boiler-room (100%)
Court
District of Nevada
Case No.
2:07-CV-00506
Outcome
settled · 2008-02-21
Disgorgement
$3,381,689
Civil penalty
$120,000
Entity
Gerald Harold Levine
Classified boiler-room(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D· recall 50% / precision 4%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionGerald Harold LevineGerald H. LevineMarie A. LevineAlan B. CopelandNu Star Holdings, Inc.
Keywords
starlevinessecuritiescopeland starlitigation litreleaseslevinesecurities exchangelevines copelandcopelandexchangelitigationagainstgerald haroldharold levineenjoins levines

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 4
  • $3.38M $3,381,689 $1M–$10M
  • $2.59M $2,593,712 $1M–$10M
  • $788K $787,977 $100K–$1M
  • $120K $120,000 $100K–$1M
Entities 9
  • person Judge Lloyd George ×2
  • person Alan B. Copeland
  • person Bruce C. Rothenberg
  • person Gerald Harold Levine
  • company gerald h. levine, marie a. levine, alan b. copeland, and nu star holdings, inc.
  • person Isaac B. Morley
  • person Marie a. Levine
  • organization Nu Star Holdings Inc.
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 3
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission entered final judgment against Gerald H. Levine, Marie A. Levine, Alan B. Copeland, and Nu Star Holdings, Inc.
  • Judge Lloyd George entered final judgment against Gerald H. Levine, Marie A. Levine, Alan B. Copeland, and Nu Star Holdings, Inc.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced final judgment against Gerald H. Levine, Marie A. Levine, Alan B. Copeland, and Nu Star Holdings, Inc. on April 7, 2010
View original SEC litigation releasesec.gov
Extracted body text (4,023c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 21485 / April 14, 2010Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gerald Harold Levine, et al., Case No. 2:07-CV-00506 in the United States District Court for the District of NevadaCourt Enters Final Judgment Against Recidivists Gerald H. Levine and Marie A. Levine, As Well As Alan B. Copeland and Nu Star Holdings, Inc.The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on April 7, 2010, Judge Lloyd George of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada entered a final judgment against two securities fraud recidivists, Las Vegas residents Gerald H. Levine and Marie A. Levine, as well as Santa Ana, California resident Alan B. Copeland and Nu Star Holdings, Inc. ("Nu Star"), a company run by the Levines' daughter. The final judgment: (1) enjoins the Levines, Copeland and Nu Star from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"); (2) enjoins the Levines and Nu Star from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act; (3) enjoins the Levines from violating Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act; (4) orders the Levines, Copeland and Nu Star to pay $2,593,712 in disgorgement plus $787,977 in prejudgment interest, for a total of $3,381,689; (5) orders the Levines, Copeland and Nu Star to pay a civil penalty of $120,000; (6) bars the Levines and Copeland from participating in an offer of a penny stock; and (7) bars the Levines from acting as officers or directors of publicly traded companies.The court issued the final judgment after granting the Commission's motion for summary judgment. In the motion for summary judgment, the Commission argued that from October 1, 2003 through December 31, 2005, the Levines and their associates worked with boiler rooms in Barcelona, Spain and set up their own boiler room in Santa Ana, California to sell various Pink Sheets stocks to innocent, overseas investors. The Levines were assisted in their endeavors by defendant Copeland, who introduced them to the individuals who operated the Barcelona boiler rooms and who assisted in setting up the Santa Ana, California boiler room.The Commission's motion for summary judgment argued that these defendants made numerous material misrepresentations and omissions in violation of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. These misrepresentations and omissions included the following: (a) failing to disclose that the promoters of these stocks had previously been found liable for fraud; (b) failing to disclose that the president of Nu Star had been suspended from the practice of law for three years; (c) failing to disclose to investors the excessive commissions that were paid from the proceeds of the sale of Nu Star stock; (d) misrepresenting the location of the unlicensed brokers who worked in the boiler rooms; and (e) assisting in the preparation of fake "independent" research reports which claimed Nu Star was a stock with a strong upside.On February 21, 2008, the court entered judgments against defendants Isaac B. Morley and Bruce C. Rothenberg, who settled with the Commission without admitting or denying the allegations against them.The Commission's action against the remaining defendants is pending.For further information this action, see Litigation Release No. 20077 (April 18, 2007), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2007/lr20077.htm.For further information about the SEC's other action against the Levines, please see the following:Litigation Release No. 20124 (May 22, 2007), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2007/lr20124.htm;Litigation Release No. 18420 (October 21, 2003), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18420.htm;Litigation Release No. 17139 (September 19, 2001), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17139.htm; andLitigation Release No. 16299 (September 28, 1999), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16299.htm.
OCR text (4,023c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 21485 / April 14, 2010Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gerald Harold Levine, et al., Case No. 2:07-CV-00506 in the United States District Court for the District of NevadaCourt Enters Final Judgment Against Recidivists Gerald H. Levine and Marie A. Levine, As Well As Alan B. Copeland and Nu Star Holdings, Inc.The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on April 7, 2010, Judge Lloyd George of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada entered a final judgment against two securities fraud recidivists, Las Vegas residents Gerald H. Levine and Marie A. Levine, as well as Santa Ana, California resident Alan B. Copeland and Nu Star Holdings, Inc. ("Nu Star"), a company run by the Levines' daughter. The final judgment: (1) enjoins the Levines, Copeland and Nu Star from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"); (2) enjoins the Levines and Nu Star from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act; (3) enjoins the Levines from violating Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act; (4) orders the Levines, Copeland and Nu Star to pay $2,593,712 in disgorgement plus $787,977 in prejudgment interest, for a total of $3,381,689; (5) orders the Levines, Copeland and Nu Star to pay a civil penalty of $120,000; (6) bars the Levines and Copeland from participating in an offer of a penny stock; and (7) bars the Levines from acting as officers or directors of publicly traded companies.The court issued the final judgment after granting the Commission's motion for summary judgment. In the motion for summary judgment, the Commission argued that from October 1, 2003 through December 31, 2005, the Levines and their associates worked with boiler rooms in Barcelona, Spain and set up their own boiler room in Santa Ana, California to sell various Pink Sheets stocks to innocent, overseas investors. The Levines were assisted in their endeavors by defendant Copeland, who introduced them to the individuals who operated the Barcelona boiler rooms and who assisted in setting up the Santa Ana, California boiler room.The Commission's motion for summary judgment argued that these defendants made numerous material misrepresentations and omissions in violation of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. These misrepresentations and omissions included the following: (a) failing to disclose that the promoters of these stocks had previously been found liable for fraud; (b) failing to disclose that the president of Nu Star had been suspended from the practice of law for three years; (c) failing to disclose to investors the excessive commissions that were paid from the proceeds of the sale of Nu Star stock; (d) misrepresenting the location of the unlicensed brokers who worked in the boiler rooms; and (e) assisting in the preparation of fake "independent" research reports which claimed Nu Star was a stock with a strong upside.On February 21, 2008, the court entered judgments against defendants Isaac B. Morley and Bruce C. Rothenberg, who settled with the Commission without admitting or denying the allegations against them.The Commission's action against the remaining defendants is pending.For further information this action, see Litigation Release No. 20077 (April 18, 2007), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2007/lr20077.htm.For further information about the SEC's other action against the Levines, please see the following:Litigation Release No. 20124 (May 22, 2007), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2007/lr20124.htm;Litigation Release No. 18420 (October 21, 2003), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18420.htm;Litigation Release No. 17139 (September 19, 2001), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17139.htm; andLitigation Release No. 16299 (September 28, 1999), http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16299.htm.