SEC v. PREMIUM POINT INVESTMENTS LP; ANILESHA AHUJA a/k/a NEIL AHUJA; AMIN MAJIDI; JEREMY SHOR; ASHISH DOLE; and FRANK DINUCCI, JR., No. 1:18-cv-04145, Southern District of New York (July 24, 2024) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. PREMIUM POINT INVESTMENTS LP
SEC v. PREMIUM POINT INVESTMENTS LP, No. 1:18-cv-04145 (July 24, 2024)
Frank Dinucci, Jr. consented to a final judgment and permanent injunction against securities fraud and investment adviser misconduct following an SEC enforcement action.
The SEC obtained a final judgment against Frank Dinucci, Jr. for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Securities Act of 1933, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The court permanently enjoined Dinucci from engaging in fraudulent schemes, deceptive practices, and material omissions involving securities and pooled investment vehicles. No civil penalty was ordered due to Dinucci's cooperation with the Commission's investigation.
The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against Frank Dinucci, Jr. in connection with an enforcement action involving Premium Point Investments LP. The judgment permanently enjoins Dinucci from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, and various sections of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. These violations involved employing fraudulent devices and making material omissions to defraud clients and prospective investors. Dinucci consented to the court's jurisdiction and the entry of the judgment, waiving his right to appeal. Because of his cooperation during the investigation, the court did not impose a civil penalty. The judgment also stipulates that any future debts arising from this proceeding are non-dischargeable in bankruptcy.
Extracted insights
- agency the securities and exchange commission
- The Securities and Exchange Commission Filed An Amended Complaint
- Defendant Frank Dinucci, Jr. Entered A general appearance
- Defendant Frank Dinucci, Jr. Consented to The Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant Frank Dinucci, Jr. Consented to Entry of this Final Judgment
- Defendant Frank Dinucci, Jr. Waived Findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant Frank Dinucci, Jr. Waived Any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from obtaining money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective client
- The Court Ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. PREMIUM POINT INVESTMENTS LP, ANILESHA AHUJA a/k/a NEIL AHUJA, AMIN MAJIDI, JEREMY SHOR, ASHISH DOLE, and FRANK DINUCCI, JR., Defendants. 18 Civ. 4145 (JPC) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT FRANK DINUCCI, JR. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) having filed an Amended Complaint and Defendant Frank Dinucci, Jr. (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 2 (b)to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b)to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive 3 (a)em ploying any device, scheme, or artifices to defraud any client or prospective client; or (b)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Advisers Act Section 206(4) [15 U.S.C. § 80b-6(4)] and Rule 206(4)-8(a)(2) [17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8(a)(2)] promulgated thereunder by, while acting as an investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle, actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. I T IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Sections 206(1) and (2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1) and 80b-6(2)] from, while acting as investment advisers, by the use of any means or instruments of in terstate commerce: 4 engaging in any act, practice, or course of business that is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative with respect to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Fin al Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). V. I T IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that based on Defendant’s cooperation in a Commission investigation and related enforcement action, the Court is not ordering Defendant to pay a civil penalty. If at any time following the entry of the Final Judgment the Commission obtains information indicating that Defendant knowingly provided materially false or misleading information or materials to the Commission or in a related proceeding, the Commission may, at its sole discretion and without prior notice to the Defendant, petition the Court for an order requiring Defendant to pay a civil penalty. In connection with any such petition and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Defendant will be precluded from arguing that he did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b) Defendant may not challenge the validity of the Judgment, this Consent, or any related Undertakings; (c) the allegations of the Complaint, solely for the purposes of such motion, shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under these circumstances, the parties may take discovery, includin g discovery from appropriate non-parties. 5 Dated: , 2024 HON. JOHN P. CRONAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE VI. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for p urposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the Amended Complaint are true and admitted by Defendants, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant u nder this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy C ode, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). VIII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. July 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. PREMIUM POINT INVESTMENTS LP, ANILESHA AHUJA a/k/a NEIL AHUJA, AMIN MAJIDI, JEREMY SHOR, ASHISH DOLE, and FRANK DINUCCI, JR., Defendants. 18 Civ. 4145 (JPC) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT FRANK DINUCCI, JR. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) having filed an Amended Complaint and Defendant Frank Dinucci, Jr. (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; Case 1:18-cv-04145-JPC Document 87 Filed 07/08/24 Page 1 of 5 Bests Cross-Out 2 (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive Case 1:18-cv-04145-JPC Document 87 Filed 07/08/24 Page 2 of 5 3 (a) employing any device, scheme, or artifices to defraud any client or prospective client; or (b) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Advisers Act Section 206(4) [15 U.S.C. § 80b-6(4)] and Rule 206(4)-8(a)(2) [17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8(a)(2)] promulgated thereunder by, while acting as an investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle, actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Sections 206(1) and (2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1) and 80b-6(2)] from, while acting as investment advisers, by the use of any means or instruments of interstate commerce: Case 1:18-cv-04145-JPC Document 87 Filed 07/08/24 Page 3 of 5 4 engaging in any act, practice, or course of business that is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative with respect to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). V. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that based on Defendant’s cooperation in a Commission investigation and related enforcement action, the Court is not ordering Defendant to pay a civil penalty. If at any time following the entry of the Final Judgment the Commission obtains information indicating that Defendant knowingly provided materially false or misleading information or materials to the Commission or in a related proceeding, the Commission may, at its sole discretion and without prior notice to the Defendant, petition the Court for an order requiring Defendant to pay a civil penalty. In connection with any such petition and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Defendant will be precluded from arguing that he did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b) Defendant may not challenge the validity of the Judgment, this Consent, or any related Undertakings; (c) the allegations of the Complaint, solely for the purposes of such motion, shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under these circumstances, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties. Case 1:18-cv-04145-JPC Document 87 Filed 07/08/24 Page 4 of 5 5 Dated: , 2024 HON. JOHN P. CRONAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE VI. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the Amended Complaint are true and admitted by Defendants, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). VIII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. July 8 Case 1:18-cv-04145-JPC Document 87 Filed 07/08/24 Page 5 of 5