SEC v. Suzee Han, No. 1:23-cv-01424, Eastern District of New York (Mar. 24, 2026) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. SUZEE HAN
SEC v. SUZEE HAN, No. 1:23-cv-01424 (Mar. 24, 2026)
Classified financial-fraud(confidence 80%). EDGAR detection: forms 10-K/10-Q/8-K/NT 10-K· recall 67% / precision 23%. detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange ActSection 17(a) of the Securities ActRule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionOzy Media, Inc.Carlos R Watson, Jr.Samir RaoSuzee Han
Keywords
securities exchangeordered adjudgedadjudged decreedhanfurther orderedsecuritiessuzeeexchangeexchange commissionenv-jrc documentdocument pagepage pageidmaterial factfinalordered
Extracted insights
Entities 5
- company cohen williams llp
- person final judgment
- person judgment imposing injunctive relief
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person suzee han
Triples 10
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed Complaint
- Suzee Han consented to Court's jurisdiction
- Suzee Han consented to Judgment imposing injunctive relief
- Suzee Han consented to Final Judgment
- Suzee Han waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Suzee Han waived right to appeal
- Defendant is restrained from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
- Defendant is restrained from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Suzee Han consents to entry of a final judgment
- COHEN WILLIAMS LLP represents Suzee Han
PDF
Text layers
Extracted body text (5,043c)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
23 Civ. 1424 (ENV) (RER)
v.
SUZEE HAN,
Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT SUZEE HAN
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Suzee
Han (“Han” or “Defendant”) having entered a general appearance and consented to the Court’s
jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; Defendant having consented to
a Judgment imposing injunctive relief entered by the Court on March 14, 2023; Defendant
having consented to entry of this Final Judgment, waived findings of fact and conclusions of law,
and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
244
2
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
(the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the
mails, directly or indirectly:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.
245
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
III.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is
incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant
shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.
IV.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
V.
There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.
Dated: 3/18/2026
/s/ Eric N. Vitaliano
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
246
Reuven L. Cohen
Tel: 213-232-5163
[email protected]
Michael V Schafler
Tel: 213-232-5146
[email protected]
724 South Spring Street, 9th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Tel: 213-232-5160
Fax: 213-232-5167
www.cohen-williams.com
February 26, 2026
VIA EMAIL
Hayden M. Brockett
Trial Attorney
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Regional Office
100 Pearl St. #20-100
New York, NY 10004
Re: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Suzee Han, Case No. 23 Civ. 1424 (ENV)
(RER)
Dear Hayden:
We are writing to you, on behalf of our client Suzee Han, to confirm that Ms. Han consents to
the entry of a final judgment in this matter following the consent to the entry of judgment that was
submitted and entered by the Court in March 2023. See ECF 15-3 and 17.
If you would like to discuss the matter further, please let us know. Thank you.
Sincerely,
COHEN WILLIAMS LLP
Reuven L. Cohen
Michael V Schafler
Atoosa Esmaili
247OCR text (5,488c · textlayer · 95% conf)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
23 Civ. 1424 (ENV) (RER)
v.
SUZEE HAN,
Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT SUZEE HAN
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Suzee
Han (“Han” or “Defendant”) having entered a general appearance and consented to the Court’s
jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; Defendant having consented to
a Judgment imposing injunctive relief entered by the Court on March 14, 2023; Defendant
having consented to entry of this Final Judgment, waived findings of fact and conclusions of law,
and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
Case 1:23-cv-01424-ENV-JRC Document 49 Filed 03/18/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:
244
2
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
(the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the
mails, directly or indirectly:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.
Case 1:23-cv-01424-ENV-JRC Document 49 Filed 03/18/26 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:
245
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
III.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is
incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant
shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.
IV.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
V.
There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.
Dated: 3/18/2026
/s/ Eric N. Vitaliano
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:23-cv-01424-ENV-JRC Document 49 Filed 03/18/26 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:
246
Reuven L. Cohen
Tel: 213-232-5163
[email protected]
Michael V Schafler
Tel: 213-232-5146
[email protected]
724 South Spring Street, 9th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Tel: 213-232-5160
Fax: 213-232-5167
www.cohen-williams.com
February 26, 2026
VIA EMAIL
Hayden M. Brockett
Trial Attorney
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Regional Office
100 Pearl St. #20-100
New York, NY 10004
Re: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Suzee Han, Case No. 23 Civ. 1424 (ENV)
(RER)
Dear Hayden:
We are writing to you, on behalf of our client Suzee Han, to confirm that Ms. Han consents to
the entry of a final judgment in this matter following the consent to the entry of judgment that was
submitted and entered by the Court in March 2023. See ECF 15-3 and 17.
If you would like to discuss the matter further, please let us know. Thank you.
Sincerely,
COHEN WILLIAMS LLP
Reuven L. Cohen
Michael V Schafler
Atoosa Esmaili
Case 1:23-cv-01424-ENV-JRC Document 49 Filed 03/18/26 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:
247