2024-04-30 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 2,887 chars

SEC v. Sanjay Bhandari; Vinod Singhi; and Rakesh Jain, No. LR-25989, Eastern District of Virginia (Apr. 30, 2024) — Press Release

raw: Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, Rakesh Jain

Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, Rakesh Jain, No. 1:24-cv-00710 (Apr. 30, 2024)

Caption
Snyder v. Exactech Inc.
summary

Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain settled SEC insider trading charges for $170,000 after profiting $70,000 from Zogenix Inc. acquisition news.

paragraph

The SEC charged Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain with violating federal antifraud provisions for trading on nonpublic information regarding the acquisition of Zogenix Inc. The trio generated approximately $70,000 in profits through trades executed just before the January 19, 2022, public announcement. To settle the matter, the defendants agreed to pay over $170,000 in combined disgorgement, interest, and civil penalties.

narrative

The SEC filed insider trading charges against Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain for profiting approximately $70,000 from Zogenix Inc. stock trades. Bhandari obtained material, nonpublic information about the company's acquisition during a phone call with a Zogenix employee on January 18, 2022. He subsequently tipped off Singhi, who then passed the information to Jain, allowing all three to buy stock before the price surged over 60% following the public announcement. The defendants have agreed to settle the charges without admitting or denying the allegations. The settlement requires them to pay a combined total of over $170,000 in disgorgement, interest, and penalties. Additionally, each defendant consented to permanent injunctions against future violations of federal securities laws.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
insider-trading (100%)
Court
Eastern District of Virginia
Case No.
1:24-cv-00710
Outcome
settled
Disgorgement
$170,000
Civil penalty
$73,523
Entity
Sanjay Bhandari
Ticker
Zogenix Inc.
Classified insider-trading(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms 4/3/5/144· recall 81% / precision 19%. detection rule →
Parties
SnyderExactech Inc.
Keywords
bhandarisinghijainsanjay bhandarisecurities exchangemade aboutsinghi jainzogenixbhandari vinodvinod singhisinghi rakeshrakesh jainexchange commissionzogenix stockbhandari singhi

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 12
  • $170K $170,000 $100K–$1M
  • $74K $73,523 $10K–$100K
  • $70K $70,000 $10K–$100K
  • $49K $49,015 $10K–$100K
  • $49K $49,000 $10K–$100K
  • $11K $10,555 $10K–$100K
  • $11K $10,500 $10K–$100K
  • $10K $9,570 <$10K
  • $10K $9,500 <$10K
  • $7K $7,020 <$10K
  • $2K $1,512 <$10K
  • $1K $1,371 <$10K
Entities 8
  • agency assistance of the financial industry regulatory authority
  • scheme_term insider trading charges against sanjay bhandari, vinod singhi, and rakesh jain
  • person rakesh jain
  • person sanjay bhandari
  • agency sec investigation
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • person vinod singhi
  • person zogenix employee
Triples 15
  • SEC filed insider trading charges against Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain
  • Sanjay Bhandari learned acquisition on January 18, 2022 during a phone conversation with a Zogenix employee
  • Zogenix employee told Sanjay Bhandari about the acquisition
  • Sanjay Bhandari began buying Zogenix stock while still on the phone with the Zogenix employee
  • Sanjay Bhandari provided material nonpublic acquisition news to Vinod Singhi
  • Vinod Singhi provided material nonpublic acquisition news to Rakesh Jain
  • Vinod Singhi purchased Zogenix stock before the public announcement
  • Rakesh Jain purchased Zogenix stock before the public announcement
  • Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain sold all of their Zogenix stock before noon on January 19, 2022
  • SEC alleges Sanjay Bhandari made about $49,000 on his Zogenix trades
  • SEC alleges Vinod Singhi made about $10,500 on his Zogenix trades
  • SEC alleges Rakesh Jain made about $9,500 on his Zogenix trades
  • Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain consented to judgments permanently enjoining them from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
  • SEC investigation was conducted by Jonathan Allen, Magdalena Ellis, David D'Addio, and Amy Gwiazda of the Boston Regional Office
  • SEC appreciates assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
PDF (from attached: complaint)
Text layers
Extracted body text (2,887c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25989 / April 30, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sanjay Bhandari et al., No. 1:24-cv-00710 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30, 2024) SEC Charges Virginia Resident and Two Friends with Insider Trading The Securities and Exchange Commission filed insider trading charges today against Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain, who collectively made about $70,000 in profits from trading in advance of the January 19, 2022 announcement that Zogenix Inc. would be acquired by another company. They each offered to settle the SEC's action, including by agreeing to pay disgorgement, interest, and penalties totaling over $170,000. According to the SEC's complaint, Virginia resident Bhandari learned of the acquisition on January 18, 2022, the day before the first public announcement of the acquisition, during a phone conversation with an individual who worked at Zogenix. As alleged in the complaint, the individual had a close personal relationship with Bhandari and told Bhandari about the acquisition in the context of seeking career advice. The complaint alleges that Bhandari began buying Zogenix stock while still on the phone with the individual at Zogenix, and then provided the material, nonpublic acquisition news to his friend and New York resident Singhi, who in turn provided it to their mutual friend and California resident Jain. As alleged, Singhi and Jain each then purchased Zogenix stock before the public announcement, and Bhandari, Singhi, and Jain then sold all of their stock before noon on January 19, 2022, after the acquisition announcement was made public and the price of Zogenix stock had increased over 60% in value. The SEC alleges that Bhandari made about $49,000 on his Zogenix trades, Singhi made about $10,500, and Jain made about $9,500. The SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, charges Bhandari, Singhi, and Jain with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Bhandari, Singhi, and Jain consented to judgments permanently enjoining them from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; ordering Bhandari to pay disgorgement of $49,015, prejudgment interest of $7,020, and a civil penalty of $73,523; ordering Singhi to pay disgorgement of $10,555, prejudgment interest of $1,512, and a civil penalty of $10,555; and ordering Jain to pay disgorgement of $9,570, prejudgment interest of $1,371, and a civil penalty of $9,570. The judgments are subject to court approval. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jonathan Allen, Magdalena Ellis, David D'Addio, and Amy Gwiazda of the SEC's Boston Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. SEC Complaint
OCR text (2,887c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25989 / April 30, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sanjay Bhandari et al., No. 1:24-cv-00710 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30, 2024) SEC Charges Virginia Resident and Two Friends with Insider Trading The Securities and Exchange Commission filed insider trading charges today against Sanjay Bhandari, Vinod Singhi, and Rakesh Jain, who collectively made about $70,000 in profits from trading in advance of the January 19, 2022 announcement that Zogenix Inc. would be acquired by another company. They each offered to settle the SEC's action, including by agreeing to pay disgorgement, interest, and penalties totaling over $170,000. According to the SEC's complaint, Virginia resident Bhandari learned of the acquisition on January 18, 2022, the day before the first public announcement of the acquisition, during a phone conversation with an individual who worked at Zogenix. As alleged in the complaint, the individual had a close personal relationship with Bhandari and told Bhandari about the acquisition in the context of seeking career advice. The complaint alleges that Bhandari began buying Zogenix stock while still on the phone with the individual at Zogenix, and then provided the material, nonpublic acquisition news to his friend and New York resident Singhi, who in turn provided it to their mutual friend and California resident Jain. As alleged, Singhi and Jain each then purchased Zogenix stock before the public announcement, and Bhandari, Singhi, and Jain then sold all of their stock before noon on January 19, 2022, after the acquisition announcement was made public and the price of Zogenix stock had increased over 60% in value. The SEC alleges that Bhandari made about $49,000 on his Zogenix trades, Singhi made about $10,500, and Jain made about $9,500. The SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, charges Bhandari, Singhi, and Jain with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Bhandari, Singhi, and Jain consented to judgments permanently enjoining them from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; ordering Bhandari to pay disgorgement of $49,015, prejudgment interest of $7,020, and a civil penalty of $73,523; ordering Singhi to pay disgorgement of $10,555, prejudgment interest of $1,512, and a civil penalty of $10,555; and ordering Jain to pay disgorgement of $9,570, prejudgment interest of $1,371, and a civil penalty of $9,570. The judgments are subject to court approval. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jonathan Allen, Magdalena Ellis, David D'Addio, and Amy Gwiazda of the SEC's Boston Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. SEC Complaint