SEC v. Travis Treusch, No. LR-25962, Eastern District of New York (Apr. 2, 2024) — Press Release
raw: Travis Treusch
Travis Treusch, No. LR-25962 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2024)
Travis Treusch consented to a partial resolution after being charged by the SEC for aiding and abetting a $2 million 'free-riding' scheme involving unfunded brokerage accounts.
The SEC charged Travis Treusch for aiding and abetting a multi-year scheme that generated over $2 million in illicit profits. Treusch is alleged to have recruited individuals to open unfunded brokerage accounts and provided credentials to principals Eduardo Hernandez and Christopher Flagg. He faces charges for violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.
The SEC has charged Travis Treusch for his role in a multi-year 'free-riding' scheme that generated more than $2 million in illicit profits. Between July 2020 and January 2022, Treusch allegedly aided and abetted principals Eduardo Hernandez and Christopher Flagg by recruiting individuals to open unfunded brokerage accounts. These 'loser' accounts utilized instant deposit credits to fund profitable trades in other controlled 'winner' accounts. Treusch provided the principals with login credentials for these accounts and was compensated for each account he secured for the scheme. Treusch faces charges for aiding and abetting violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Treusch consented to a bifurcated judgment and a conduct-based injunction, with final monetary relief and the duration of the injunction pending court determination.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $2.00M $2 million $1M–$10M
- person christopher flagg
- person corey ortiz
- person daquan lloyd
- person eduardo hernandez
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person travis treusch
- Securities And Exchange Commission charged Travis Treusch
- Securities And Exchange Commission charged Eduardo Hernandez
- Securities And Exchange Commission charged Christopher Flagg
- Securities And Exchange Commission charged Daquan Lloyd
- Securities And Exchange Commission charged Corey Ortiz
- Travis Treusch aided and abetted Eduardo Hernandez and Christopher Flagg
- Travis Treusch opened a loser account
- Travis Treusch recruited others to open loser accounts
- Travis Treusch provided the Principals with account login credentials
- Travis Treusch recruited at least two individuals to set up accounts for Eduardo Hernandez
- Securities And Exchange Commission alleges the Principals transferred broker credit from loser accounts to winner accounts
- Securities And Exchange Commission alleges the scheme generated more than $2 million in illicit profits
- Securities And Exchange Commission charges Travis Treusch with aiding and abetting violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- Travis Treusch consented to a bifurcated judgment enjoining him from violations of the charged provisions
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25962 / April 2, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Treusch, No. 1:24-civ-01050 (E.D.N.Y. filed Feb. 11, 2024) SEC Charges Additional Defendant for Role in Lucrative “Free-Riding” Scheme On February 11, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Travis Treusch, a Long Island, New York resident, in connection with his role in a multi-year “free-riding” scheme. Treusch consented to a partial resolution of the charges. The SEC previously charged Eduardo Hernandez, Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd, and Corey Ortiz, also all currently or formerly of Long Island, New York, for their roles in the scheme that generated more than $2 million in illicit profits. The SEC alleges that, from approximately July 2020 through January 2022, Treusch aided and abetted Hernandez and Flagg (the “Principals”) in a free-riding scheme, in which the Principals opened and used unfunded brokerage accounts (the loser accounts) to generate trading profits in other brokerage accounts that they also controlled (the winner accounts). The complaint alleges the Principals maintained the loser accounts at a broker that provided an instant deposit credit, which they used to fund trades at manipulated prices. The complaint alleges that in doing so, the Principals essentially transferred the credit provided by the broker from the loser accounts to the winner accounts, accumulating guaranteed profits at the broker’s expense. The complaint alleges that Treusch opened a loser account himself and recruited others to do the same for use in the scheme, and then provided the Principals with the account login credentials so the Principals could access and control the loser accounts in the names of those recruited, thereby deceiving the brokers. The SEC alleges that Treusch also recruited at least two individuals to set up accounts and cede control of them to Hernandez, who used them as winner accounts in the scheme. According to the complaint, Treusch was compensated for each account he secured for the scheme. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charges Treusch with aiding and abetting the Principals’ violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, Treusch consented to a bifurcated judgment enjoining him from violations of the charged provisions and a conduct-based injunction, with the duration of the conduct-based injunction and the amount of monetary relief to be determined by the court upon motion of the SEC. The settlement is subject to Court approval. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Cynthia A. Matthews, David Austin, Matthew Lambert, John Marino, Pat McCluskey and Lindsay S. Moilanen of the New York Regional Office and the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit, and is being supervised by Joseph Sansone. The SEC’s Office of Market Intelligence provided assistance. The SEC’s litigation will be conducted by Ms. Matthews and Christopher Dunnigan and supervised by Preethi Krishnamurthy. SEC Complaint
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25962 / April 2, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Treusch, No. 1:24-civ-01050 (E.D.N.Y. filed Feb. 11, 2024) SEC Charges Additional Defendant for Role in Lucrative “Free-Riding” Scheme On February 11, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Travis Treusch, a Long Island, New York resident, in connection with his role in a multi-year “free-riding” scheme. Treusch consented to a partial resolution of the charges. The SEC previously charged Eduardo Hernandez, Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd, and Corey Ortiz, also all currently or formerly of Long Island, New York, for their roles in the scheme that generated more than $2 million in illicit profits. The SEC alleges that, from approximately July 2020 through January 2022, Treusch aided and abetted Hernandez and Flagg (the “Principals”) in a free-riding scheme, in which the Principals opened and used unfunded brokerage accounts (the loser accounts) to generate trading profits in other brokerage accounts that they also controlled (the winner accounts). The complaint alleges the Principals maintained the loser accounts at a broker that provided an instant deposit credit, which they used to fund trades at manipulated prices. The complaint alleges that in doing so, the Principals essentially transferred the credit provided by the broker from the loser accounts to the winner accounts, accumulating guaranteed profits at the broker’s expense. The complaint alleges that Treusch opened a loser account himself and recruited others to do the same for use in the scheme, and then provided the Principals with the account login credentials so the Principals could access and control the loser accounts in the names of those recruited, thereby deceiving the brokers. The SEC alleges that Treusch also recruited at least two individuals to set up accounts and cede control of them to Hernandez, who used them as winner accounts in the scheme. According to the complaint, Treusch was compensated for each account he secured for the scheme. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charges Treusch with aiding and abetting the Principals’ violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, Treusch consented to a bifurcated judgment enjoining him from violations of the charged provisions and a conduct-based injunction, with the duration of the conduct-based injunction and the amount of monetary relief to be determined by the court upon motion of the SEC. The settlement is subject to Court approval. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Cynthia A. Matthews, David Austin, Matthew Lambert, John Marino, Pat McCluskey and Lindsay S. Moilanen of the New York Regional Office and the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit, and is being supervised by Joseph Sansone. The SEC’s Office of Market Intelligence provided assistance. The SEC’s litigation will be conducted by Ms. Matthews and Christopher Dunnigan and supervised by Preethi Krishnamurthy. SEC Complaint