SEC v. Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr.; and Robert T. Kirk, Jr., No. LR-18533, Southern District of New York — Press Release
raw: Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. and Robert T. Kirk, Jr.
Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. and Robert T. Kirk, Jr., No. LR-18533
Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. and Robert T. Kirk, Jr. defrauded investors in busybox.com’s June 2000 IPO by orchestrating undisclosed insider stock purchases funded by bonuses and an inflated legal fee paid to Prousalis, secretly financed and repaid by Barron Chase, reducing net proceeds by $2.1M and giving them nearly 20% of shares, while concealing all details and failing to file required disclosures.
The SEC charged Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. and Robert T. Kirk, Jr. with securities fraud in connection with busybox.com’s $12.8 million June 2000 IPO, alleging they concealed a scheme in which insiders bought IPO shares using undisclosed bonuses and Prousalis received an inflated, undisclosed legal fee paid in IPO securities. Barron Chase Securities, led by Kirk, secretly financed these transactions and was repaid from IPO proceeds, reducing busybox’s net proceeds by over $2.1 million while Prousalis and insiders acquired nearly 20% of the offering. Prousalis also failed to file Schedule 13D disclosures for his over-5% ownership and subsequent sale of shares, violating Sections 17(a), 10(b), Rule 10b-5, and Section 13(d) of federal securities laws; the SEC seeks disgorgement, penalties, and injunctions.
Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr., securities counsel for busybox.com, and Robert T. Kirk, Jr., president of lead underwriter Barron Chase Securities, were charged by the SEC with orchestrating a fraudulent scheme to complete busybox.com’s June 2000 IPO, which was intended to raise $12.8 million. After learning Barron Chase struggled to sell the shares to legitimate investors, Kirk and Prousalis arranged for busybox insiders to purchase IPO securities using undisclosed bonuses and caused Prousalis to receive an inflated, undisclosed legal fee paid in IPO shares, all secretly financed by Barron Chase. During the IPO closing, busybox repaid Barron Chase using the offering proceeds, effectively recycling the funds and reducing the company’s net proceeds by over $2.1 million, while insiders and Prousalis collectively acquired nearly 20% of the shares. The IPO registration statement and prospectus omitted all material facts—including the insider purchases, inflated fee, Barron Chase’s financing, and repayment—thereby misleading investors about the company’s financial health. Prousalis further violated securities laws by failing to file Schedule 13D disclosures for his over-5% ownership stake and later failing to report the sale of all his busybox shares. The SEC alleges violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, and Section 13(d) for the disclosure failures, seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of approximately $1.25 million and $1.5 million in illicit fees respectively, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York also filed related criminal charges against both defendants, and the SEC’s investigation remains ongoing.
Extracted insights
- $12.80M $12.8 million $10M–$100M
- $2.10M $2.1 million $1M–$10M
- $1.50M $1.5 million $1M–$10M
- $1.25M $1.25 million $1M–$10M
- company barron chase securities, inc.
- company busybox.com, inc.
- company in connection with the june 2000 initial public offering by busybox.com, inc.
- Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. and Robert T. Kirk, Jr. committed fraud in connection with the June 2000 initial public offering by busybox.com, Inc.
- Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. was securities counsel for busybox.com, Inc.
- Robert T. Kirk, Jr. was majority owner and president of Barron Chase Securities, Inc.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. and Robert T. Kirk, Jr. with committing fraud in connection with the June 2000 initial public offering by busybox.com, Inc. Prousalis was securities counsel for busybox and Kirk was the majority owner and president of Barron Chase Securities, Inc., the lead underwriter for the offering. Prousalis is a resident of McLean, Virginia and is licensed to practice in Washington, D.C. Kirk is a resident of Parkland, Florida. The complaint alleges that Barron Chase agreed to underwrite a firm commitment offering that would raise approximately $12.8 million for busybox. After informing busybox that Barron Chase was having difficulty selling the IPO securities to bona fide investors, Kirk and Prousalis devised and executed a fraudulent scheme to complete the offering. According to the complaint, Kirk and Prousalis arranged for busybox insiders to "purchase" IPO securities using undisclosed bonuses, and for Prousalis to receive an inflated and undisclosed legal fee that was to be paid using IPO securities. Barron Chase secretly financed these transactions and, during the IPO closing, Kirk and Prousalis caused busybox to repay Barron Chase out of the proceeds of the offering. The complaint further alleges that the scheme gave Prousalis and the insiders almost 20% of the securities offered in the IPO, and reduced the proceeds available to busybox by over $2.1 million. The IPO registration statement and prospectus did not disclose the insiders' stock purchases, the inflated legal fee paid to Prousalis, Barron Chase's financing of these transactions or the repayment to Barron Chase using IPO proceeds. As set forth in the complaint, the fraudulent scheme misled investors as to the financial health and future viability of the company. The complaint alleges that Prousalis and Kirk's firm benefited financially from the scheme by receiving fees of approximately $1.25 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Finally, the Commission charged that, after the IPO was completed, Prousalis owned more than 5% of the company's outstanding stock, but failed to report his holdings on a Schedule 13D, as required by law. He also failed to report the subsequent sale of all of his busybox IPO stock. The Commission charges that Prousalis and Kirk violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Prousalis is also charged with violating Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of defendants' ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, and the imposition of civil penalties against Prousalis and Kirk. Also today, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced the filing of related criminal charges against Prousalis and Kirk. The Commission thanks the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and NASD Regulation for their cooperation. The Commission's investigation is continuing. SEC Complaint in this matter
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging Thomas T. Prousalis, Jr. and Robert T. Kirk, Jr. with committing fraud in connection with the June 2000 initial public offering by busybox.com, Inc. Prousalis was securities counsel for busybox and Kirk was the majority owner and president of Barron Chase Securities, Inc., the lead underwriter for the offering. Prousalis is a resident of McLean, Virginia and is licensed to practice in Washington, D.C. Kirk is a resident of Parkland, Florida. The complaint alleges that Barron Chase agreed to underwrite a firm commitment offering that would raise approximately $12.8 million for busybox. After informing busybox that Barron Chase was having difficulty selling the IPO securities to bona fide investors, Kirk and Prousalis devised and executed a fraudulent scheme to complete the offering. According to the complaint, Kirk and Prousalis arranged for busybox insiders to "purchase" IPO securities using undisclosed bonuses, and for Prousalis to receive an inflated and undisclosed legal fee that was to be paid using IPO securities. Barron Chase secretly financed these transactions and, during the IPO closing, Kirk and Prousalis caused busybox to repay Barron Chase out of the proceeds of the offering. The complaint further alleges that the scheme gave Prousalis and the insiders almost 20% of the securities offered in the IPO, and reduced the proceeds available to busybox by over $2.1 million. The IPO registration statement and prospectus did not disclose the insiders' stock purchases, the inflated legal fee paid to Prousalis, Barron Chase's financing of these transactions or the repayment to Barron Chase using IPO proceeds. As set forth in the complaint, the fraudulent scheme misled investors as to the financial health and future viability of the company. The complaint alleges that Prousalis and Kirk's firm benefited financially from the scheme by receiving fees of approximately $1.25 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Finally, the Commission charged that, after the IPO was completed, Prousalis owned more than 5% of the company's outstanding stock, but failed to report his holdings on a Schedule 13D, as required by law. He also failed to report the subsequent sale of all of his busybox IPO stock. The Commission charges that Prousalis and Kirk violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Prousalis is also charged with violating Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of defendants' ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, and the imposition of civil penalties against Prousalis and Kirk. Also today, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced the filing of related criminal charges against Prousalis and Kirk. The Commission thanks the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and NASD Regulation for their cooperation. The Commission's investigation is continuing. SEC Complaint in this matter