SEC v. Ian G. Bell, No. LR-26488, District of Colorado (Feb. 24, 2026) — Press Release
raw: Ian G. Bell
Ian G. Bell, No. LR-26488 (Feb. 24, 2026)
Denver day-trader Ian G. Bell entered a final consent judgment to resolve SEC charges of defrauding at least 29 investors of over $1.3 million through fabricated trading performance.
Ian G. Bell was charged with orchestrating a fraudulent scheme that raised more than $1.3 million by using fabricated screenshots to deceive investors. He faced violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 after misappropriating funds for personal use. The final judgment requires Bell to pay $339,848.84 in disgorgement and $98,570.64 in prejudgment interest, which is satisfied by a parallel criminal forfeiture order.
Between July 2020 and March 2023, Denver day-trader Ian G. Bell raised over $1.3 million from at least 29 investors by using fabricated account performance screenshots. Bell allegedly misappropriated these funds for personal use and squandered nearly all the capital while lying about his ability to repay investors. To resolve the SEC enforcement action, Bell entered a final consent judgment without admitting or denying the allegations. He is permanently enjoined from violating the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is restricted from participating in securities offerings except for his own account. The judgment mandates $339,848.84 in disgorgement and $98,570.64 in prejudgment interest. These financial obligations are deemed satisfied by a forfeiture order from his parallel criminal case. The SEC litigation was led by the Denver Regional Office.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $1.30M $1.3 million $1M–$10M
- $340K $339,848 $100K–$1M
- $99K $98,570 $10K–$100K
- person fabricated account performance screenshots
- person ian g. bell
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- court u.s. district court for the district of colorado
- Securities And Exchange Commission obtained final consent judgment as to Ian G. Bell in connection with an alleged fraudulent day-trading scheme
- Ian G. Bell fraudulently raised more than $1.3 million from at least 29 investors
- Ian G. Bell sent fabricated account performance screenshots
- Ian G. Bell lost or squandered nearly all of the investors' money
- Ian G. Bell misappropriated investor money for his personal use
- Ian G. Bell lied about his plans and ability to repay investors
- U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado entered final consent judgment permanently enjoining Ian G. Bell from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
- U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado ordered Ian G. Bell to pay disgorgement of $339,848.84 plus prejudgment interest of $98,570.64
- United States Of America entered forfeiture order in parallel criminal case United States v. Bell, No. 24-cr-00345-PAB
- Securities And Exchange Commission conducted litigation by Jodanna Haskins and Ty Cottrill supervised by Gregory Kasper and Nicholas Heinke
- Securities And Exchange Commission conducted investigation by Mr. Cottrill supervised by Mr. Heinke
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26488 / February 24, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ian G. Bell, No. 24-cv-03403 (D. Colo. filed Dec. 9, 2024)SEC Obtains Final Consent Judgment as to Denver Day-Trader Charged with Defrauding InvestorsOn February 23, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado entered a final consent judgment as to Ian G. Bell in the SEC’s civil enforcement action that charged Bell in connection with an alleged fraudulent day-trading scheme.According to the SEC’s complaint, Bell, between July 2020 and March 2023, fraudulently raised more than $1.3 million from at least 29 investors by lying to investors about his trading performance, including by sending fabricated account performance screenshots. The complaint further alleged that Bell lost or squandered nearly all of the investors’ money, misappropriated investor money for his personal use, and, to conceal his fraud, lied about his plans and ability to repay investors.Without admitting or denying the allegations, Bell consented to entry of the final judgment that permanently enjoins him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, permanently enjoins him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any securities except for his own personal account, and orders him to pay disgorgement of $339,848.84, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $98,570.64, with these amounts deemed satisfied by the forfeiture order entered in the parallel criminal case United States v. Bell, No. 24-cr-00345-PAB (D. Colo. filed Dec. 3, 2024).The SEC’s litigation against Bell was conducted by Jodanna Haskins and Ty Cottrill and supervised by Gregory Kasper and Nicholas Heinke, all of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Mr. Cottrill and supervised by Mr. Heinke.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26488 / February 24, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ian G. Bell, No. 24-cv-03403 (D. Colo. filed Dec. 9, 2024)SEC Obtains Final Consent Judgment as to Denver Day-Trader Charged with Defrauding InvestorsOn February 23, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado entered a final consent judgment as to Ian G. Bell in the SEC’s civil enforcement action that charged Bell in connection with an alleged fraudulent day-trading scheme.According to the SEC’s complaint, Bell, between July 2020 and March 2023, fraudulently raised more than $1.3 million from at least 29 investors by lying to investors about his trading performance, including by sending fabricated account performance screenshots. The complaint further alleged that Bell lost or squandered nearly all of the investors’ money, misappropriated investor money for his personal use, and, to conceal his fraud, lied about his plans and ability to repay investors.Without admitting or denying the allegations, Bell consented to entry of the final judgment that permanently enjoins him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, permanently enjoins him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any securities except for his own personal account, and orders him to pay disgorgement of $339,848.84, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $98,570.64, with these amounts deemed satisfied by the forfeiture order entered in the parallel criminal case United States v. Bell, No. 24-cr-00345-PAB (D. Colo. filed Dec. 3, 2024).The SEC’s litigation against Bell was conducted by Jodanna Haskins and Ty Cottrill and supervised by Gregory Kasper and Nicholas Heinke, all of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Mr. Cottrill and supervised by Mr. Heinke.