SEC v. Emanuel Pinez; Gilboa Peretz; and PG Technologies, No. LR-16170, District of Massachusetts (June 2, 1999) — Press Release
raw: Emanuel Pinez et al.
Emanuel Pinez et al., No. LR-16170 (June 2, 1999)
Gilboa Peretz and PG Technologies were held in civil contempt for lying under oath to unblock a $30,000 account frozen due to Emanuel Pinez's insider trading and fraud, leading to the funds' expenditure, PG Technologies' bankruptcy, and a $15,000 penalty ordered by Judge Patti Saris.
Gilboa Peretz and his company PG Technologies were found in civil contempt for intentionally misrepresenting the source of $30,000 in a bank account frozen by court order as part of an SEC action against Emanuel Pinez for insider trading and financial fraud at Centennial Technologies Inc. Peretz falsely testified under oath that the funds were unrelated to Pinez, prompting the court to lift the freeze; the money was immediately spent, causing PG Technologies to go bankrupt. Judge Patti Saris ordered Peretz and PG Technologies to pay $15,000 in penalties, citing documentary evidence—including a settlement agreement with Centennial—that proved the funds originated from Pinez and that the deception was designed to obstruct asset recovery for defrauded investors.
In February 1997, the SEC filed an emergency action against Emanuel Pinez for insider trading and involvement in a large-scale financial fraud at Centennial Technologies Inc., resulting in a court order freezing assets under his control, including a $30,000 bank account held by PG Technologies, of which Pinez was a signatory. On February 24, Gilboa Peretz, representing PG Technologies, swore under oath that the funds in the account had no connection to Pinez, leading the court to lift the freeze. The funds were promptly spent, and PG Technologies soon became bankrupt. Judge Patti Saris later found that Peretz’s testimony was intentionally false and misleading, supported by documentary evidence—including a settlement agreement showing PG Technologies had purchased computer cards from Centennial at Pinez’s direction using his money. The court concluded that Peretz’s deception was designed to obstruct the court’s efforts to preserve assets for defrauded investors. As a result, Peretz and PG Technologies were held in civil contempt and ordered to pay $15,000 in penalties, representing the ill-gotten gain from their false statements. This case underscored the judiciary’s commitment to punishing deliberate misrepresentations during securities enforcement proceedings.
Extracted insights
- $30K $30,000 $10K–$100K
- $30K $30,000 $10K–$100K
- $15K $15,000 $10K–$100K
- person judge patti saris
- person judge saris
- company pg technologies
- agency the securities and exchange commission
- person this action
- The Securities and Exchange Commission Announced That Gilboa Peretz and his company PG Technologies were held in civil contempt for obstructing justice by making intentionally false and misleading statements at a hearing in federal district court
- Judge Patti Saris Found That Peretz lied concerning the relationship between Pinez and a PG Technologies bank account that had been previously frozen by the Court
- Judge Saris Ordered Peretz and PG Technologies to pay $15,000 which was released to them as a result of their false statements
- This action Arises Out Of The emergency action filed against Pinez in February 1997 for insider trading in advance of the news that he was to be fired from Centennial Technologies Inc. and that the company had been the subject of a large scale financial fraud
- Judge Saris Froze Assets of any funds in the name of or in the direct or indirect control of Pinez
- PG Technologies Requested A lift of the freeze
- Peretz Claimed That none of the $30,000 came from Pinez
- The court Lifted The freeze based on Peretz' sworn statement
- The Court Found That the Commission presented persuasive documentary evidence that Peretz intentionally misled the court at that February 24 hearing
- The Court Found That the $30,000 was in fact money that had come from Pinez
- The Court Noted That PG Technologies had acknowledged in a 'settlement agreement' with Centennial that it had previously purchased blank computer cards from Centennial at the instruction of Pinez, and that Pinez had provided the money for the payment
- The Court Concluded That Peretz gave intentionally false and misleading testimony about the source of the money in the account 'in order to interrupt and interfere with the Court's efforts to freeze Pinez's assets for the benefit for defrauded investors in Centennial.'
- The Court Noted That it would not have released the funds if it had been made aware of Pinez's involvement in PG Technologies
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16170 / June 2, 1999 SEC v. EMANUEL PINEZ ET AL., Civil Action No. 97-10353-PBS (D. MA.) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that Gilboa Peretz and his company PG Technologies were held in civil contempt for obstructing justice by making intentionally false and misleading statements at a hearing in federal district court. Specifically, Judge Patti Saris found that Peretz lied concerning the relationship between Pinez and a PG Technologies bank account that had been previously frozen by the Court. In addition, Judge Saris ordered Peretz and PG Technologies to pay $15,000 which was released to them as a result of their false statements. This action against Peretz and PG Technologies arises out of the emergency action filed against Pinez in February 1997 for insider trading in advance of the news that he was to be fired from Centennial Technologies Inc. and that the company had been the subject of a large scale financial fraud. On February 14, 1997, as part of the emergency relief, Judge Saris froze assets of any funds in the name of or in the direct or indirect control of Pinez. PG Technologies' account, which at the time contained approximately $30,000, was immediately frozen because Pinez was a signatory on the account. PG Technologies requested a lift of the freeze and on February 24, at a hearing before Judge Saris and under oath, Peretz claimed that none of the $30,000 came from Pinez. Based on Peretz' sworn statement, the court lifted the freeze. The funds were immediately expended, and PG Technologies is now bankrupt. The Court found that the Commission presented persuasive documentary evidence that Peretz intentionally misled the court at that February 24 hearing. The court found that the $30,000 was in fact money that had come from Pinez. In so finding, the Court also noted that PG Technologies had acknowledged in a "settlement agreement" with Centennial that it had previously purchased blank computer cards from Centennial at the instruction of Pinez, and that Pinez had provided the money for the payment. The Court concluded that Peretz gave intentionally false and misleading testimony about the source of the money in the account "in order to interrupt and interfere with the Court's efforts to freeze Pinez's assets for the benefit for defrauded investors in Centennial." The Court noted that it would not have released the funds if it had been made aware of Pinez's involvement in PG Technologies. For further information, please see Litigation Release Nos. 15258 15295, and 15399.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16170 / June 2, 1999 SEC v. EMANUEL PINEZ ET AL., Civil Action No. 97-10353-PBS (D. MA.) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that Gilboa Peretz and his company PG Technologies were held in civil contempt for obstructing justice by making intentionally false and misleading statements at a hearing in federal district court. Specifically, Judge Patti Saris found that Peretz lied concerning the relationship between Pinez and a PG Technologies bank account that had been previously frozen by the Court. In addition, Judge Saris ordered Peretz and PG Technologies to pay $15,000 which was released to them as a result of their false statements. This action against Peretz and PG Technologies arises out of the emergency action filed against Pinez in February 1997 for insider trading in advance of the news that he was to be fired from Centennial Technologies Inc. and that the company had been the subject of a large scale financial fraud. On February 14, 1997, as part of the emergency relief, Judge Saris froze assets of any funds in the name of or in the direct or indirect control of Pinez. PG Technologies' account, which at the time contained approximately $30,000, was immediately frozen because Pinez was a signatory on the account. PG Technologies requested a lift of the freeze and on February 24, at a hearing before Judge Saris and under oath, Peretz claimed that none of the $30,000 came from Pinez. Based on Peretz' sworn statement, the court lifted the freeze. The funds were immediately expended, and PG Technologies is now bankrupt. The Court found that the Commission presented persuasive documentary evidence that Peretz intentionally misled the court at that February 24 hearing. The court found that the $30,000 was in fact money that had come from Pinez. In so finding, the Court also noted that PG Technologies had acknowledged in a "settlement agreement" with Centennial that it had previously purchased blank computer cards from Centennial at the instruction of Pinez, and that Pinez had provided the money for the payment. The Court concluded that Peretz gave intentionally false and misleading testimony about the source of the money in the account "in order to interrupt and interfere with the Court's efforts to freeze Pinez's assets for the benefit for defrauded investors in Centennial." The Court noted that it would not have released the funds if it had been made aware of Pinez's involvement in PG Technologies. For further information, please see Litigation Release Nos. 15258 15295, and 15399.