SEC v. Marat Likhtenstein, No. LR-26476, Eastern District of New York (Feb. 5, 2026) — Press Release
raw: Marat Likhtenstein
Marat Likhtenstein, No. LR-26476 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2026)
Investment adviser Marat Likhtenstein orchestrated a $4.1 million offering fraud targeting the Russian-American Jewish community and consented to a bifurcated settlement with the SEC.
Marat Likhtenstein raised over $4.1 million from at least 15 clients by selling self-issued promissory notes under the guise of lucrative business opportunities. He allegedly misappropriated these funds through $940,000 in Ponzi-like payments and $3.2 million in personal expenses. The SEC charged him with violations of the Securities Act of 1933, the Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
From April 2017 through June 2024, investment adviser Marat Likhtenstein orchestrated an offering fraud scheme that raised more than $4.1 million from at least 15 clients, many of whom were elderly members of the Russian-American Jewish community. Likhtenstein sold self-issued promissory notes by falsely claiming they would yield extraordinary interest rates through lucrative business deals. Instead of investing the capital, he used $940,000 for Ponzi-like payments to other investors and spent nearly $3.2 million on personal expenses. The SEC filed charges against him for violating the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Likhtenstein consented to a bifurcated settlement, agreeing to injunctive relief without admitting or denying the allegations. While the court entered a consent judgment on February 4, 2026, the final monetary relief is to be determined at a later date. Additionally, Likhtenstein faced parallel criminal charges from the Kings County District Attorney’s Office in March 2025.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $4.10M $4.1 million $1M–$10M
- $4.00M $4 Million $1M–$10M
- $3.20M $3.2 million $1M–$10M
- $940K $940,000 $100K–$1M
- person marat likhtenstein
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission filed charges against Marat Likhtenstein
- Marat Likhtenstein solicited investments in the form of promissory notes
- Marat Likhtenstein recommended self-issued investments in the form of promissory notes
- Marat Likhtenstein sold self-issued investments in the form of promissory notes
- Marat Likhtenstein raised $4.1 million from at least 15 advisory clients
- Marat Likhtenstein falsely told his clients that they would earn extraordinary interest rates through investments in highly lucrative business opportunities and deals
- Marat Likhtenstein misappropriated investors' funds
- Marat Likhtenstein made $940,000 in Ponzi-like payments to other investors
- Marat Likhtenstein spent almost $3.2 million on his personal expenses
- Securities And Exchange Commission charges Marat Likhtenstein with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
- Securities And Exchange Commission seeks a final judgment ordering Marat Likhtenstein to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties, as well as enjoining him from violating the charged provisions and imposing conduct-based injunctions
- Marat Likhtenstein consented to a bifurcated settlement agreeing to the injunctive relief
- Court entered the consent judgment
- Kings County District Attorney’s Office charged Marat Likhtenstein in a parallel criminal action
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26476 / February 5, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marat Likhtenstein, No. 25-civ-05412 (E.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 26, 2025)SEC Charges Marat Likhtenstein in Connection with $4 Million Offering FraudOn September 26, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed charges against Marat Likhtenstein for perpetrating an offering fraud scheme primarily targeting the Russian-American Jewish community.According to the SEC’s complaint, from at least April 2017 through June 2024, Likhtenstein, while acting as an investment adviser, solicited, recommended, and sold self-issued investments in the form of promissory notes that raised more than $4.1 million from at least 15 advisory clients. Likhtenstein falsely told his clients, many of whom were elderly, that if they purchased promissory notes from him through his “side business,” they would earn extraordinary interest rates through investments in highly lucrative business opportunities and deals. However, as the complaint alleges, Likhtenstein did not actually invest the investors' funds. Instead, he allegedly misappropriated their funds by making $940,000 in Ponzi-like payments to other investors and by spending almost $3.2 million on his personal expenses.The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charges Likhtenstein with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The complaint seeks a final judgment ordering Likhtenstein to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties, as well as enjoining him from violating the charged provisions and imposing conduct-based injunctions. Likhtenstein, without admitting or denying the allegations, consented to a bifurcated settlement, agreeing to the injunctive relief, with monetary relief to be determined at a later date. On February 4, 2026, the Court entered the consent judgment.On March 12, 2025, Likhtenstein was charged in a parallel criminal action brought by the Kings County District Attorney’s Office.The SEC’s investigation was conducted by John C. Lehmann, Natallia Krauchuk, Patricia Schrage, Jacqueline A. Fine, and Lindsay S. Moilanen under the supervision of Mark R. Sylvester of the New York Regional Office. The litigation will be led by Ms. Krauchuk and Hayden M. Brockett under the supervision of Jack Kaufman. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Kings County District Attorney’s Office.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26476 / February 5, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marat Likhtenstein, No. 25-civ-05412 (E.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 26, 2025)SEC Charges Marat Likhtenstein in Connection with $4 Million Offering FraudOn September 26, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed charges against Marat Likhtenstein for perpetrating an offering fraud scheme primarily targeting the Russian-American Jewish community.According to the SEC’s complaint, from at least April 2017 through June 2024, Likhtenstein, while acting as an investment adviser, solicited, recommended, and sold self-issued investments in the form of promissory notes that raised more than $4.1 million from at least 15 advisory clients. Likhtenstein falsely told his clients, many of whom were elderly, that if they purchased promissory notes from him through his “side business,” they would earn extraordinary interest rates through investments in highly lucrative business opportunities and deals. However, as the complaint alleges, Likhtenstein did not actually invest the investors' funds. Instead, he allegedly misappropriated their funds by making $940,000 in Ponzi-like payments to other investors and by spending almost $3.2 million on his personal expenses.The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charges Likhtenstein with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The complaint seeks a final judgment ordering Likhtenstein to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties, as well as enjoining him from violating the charged provisions and imposing conduct-based injunctions. Likhtenstein, without admitting or denying the allegations, consented to a bifurcated settlement, agreeing to the injunctive relief, with monetary relief to be determined at a later date. On February 4, 2026, the Court entered the consent judgment.On March 12, 2025, Likhtenstein was charged in a parallel criminal action brought by the Kings County District Attorney’s Office.The SEC’s investigation was conducted by John C. Lehmann, Natallia Krauchuk, Patricia Schrage, Jacqueline A. Fine, and Lindsay S. Moilanen under the supervision of Mark R. Sylvester of the New York Regional Office. The litigation will be led by Ms. Krauchuk and Hayden M. Brockett under the supervision of Jack Kaufman. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Kings County District Attorney’s Office.