2024-09-25 SEC Press pdf 109 KB 19,055 chars

In re Sunbeam Management

summary

Sunbeam Management, LLC, a Maryland-based management and consulting firm, was found to have violated beneficial ownership reporting requirements under Sections 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act, resulting in a $40,000 civil penalty.

paragraph

Sunbeam Management, LLC, a Maryland-based management and consulting firm, was accused of violating beneficial ownership reporting requirements under Sections 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act. The alleged fraud involved Sunbeam's failure to timely file a Schedule 13D and Form 3 after acquiring 43,675 shares of convertible preferred stock of OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp., which represented 14.1% of outstanding OWC common stock. Sunbeam agreed to pay a $40,000 civil penalty in four installments over 360 days.

narrative

Sunbeam Management, LLC, a Maryland-based management and consulting firm, was found to have violated beneficial ownership reporting requirements under Sections 13(d) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act. The alleged fraud involved Sunbeam's failure to timely file a Schedule 13D and Form 3 after acquiring 43,675 shares of convertible preferred stock of OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp., which represented 14.1% of outstanding OWC common stock. Sunbeam's failure to file these reports within the required 10-day window resulted in a nearly two-month delay, with the reports being submitted on May 11 and May 18, 2020. Additionally, Sunbeam failed to amend its Schedule 13D after OWC refused to convert the preferred shares due to insufficient authorized common stock, eliminating Sunbeam's beneficial ownership of the underlying shares. The SEC found these omissions to be clear violations of mandatory reporting rules, regardless of intent. As part of the resolution, Sunbeam agreed to pay a $40,000 civil penalty in four installments over 360 days, with strict payment terms and a prohibition on seeking a penalty offset in any related investor litigation. Sunbeam consented to a cease-and-desist order without admitting or denying the findings.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
non-corporate (95%)
Court
District of Columbia
Outcome
settled
Civil penalty
$40,000
Classified non-corporate(confidence 95%). No EDGAR filing fingerprint (criminal/DOJ-side scheme). detection rule →
Statutes
31 U.S.C. § 3717SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTRule 13d-1Rule 13d-2Rule 13d-1(a)Rule 13d-2(a)Rule 16a-3Rule 16a-1(a)Rule 13d-3Rule 16a-3(a)Rule 16a-3(g)Rule 16a-3(f)Rule 13d-4
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionSunbeam Management, LLC
Keywords
respondentbeneficial ownershipcommon stockcommissionsharesexchangebeneficialstocksecuritiessecurities exchangewithin dayscommonownershiporderowc

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 4
  • $40K $40,000 $10K–$100K
  • $15K $15,000 $10K–$100K
  • $10K $10,000 $10K–$100K
  • $5K $5,000 <$10K
Entities 2
  • company shares of convertible preferred stock of owc pharmaceutical research corp
  • agency the securities and exchange commission
Triples 10
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems appropriate that cease-and-desist proceedings be instituted
  • Respondent submitted an Offer of Settlement
  • Commission determined to accept the Offer of Settlement
  • Respondent consents to the entry of this Order
  • Commission finds proceedings arise out of violations of beneficial ownership reporting requirements
  • Respondent accepted shares of convertible preferred stock of OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp
  • Respondent was deemed to be a beneficial owner of the underlying OWC common stock
  • Respondent did not file a Schedule 13D or a Form 3 until May 2020
  • Respondent violated Sections 13(d) and 16(a)
  • Respondent presented its convertible shares to OWC for conversion
Text layers
Extracted body text (19,055c)

 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
Before the 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
Release No. 101176 / September 25, 2024        
 
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 
File No. 3-22192 
 
 
In the Matter of 
 
Sunbeam Management, LLC 
 
Respondent. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES 
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING 
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER 
  
I. 
 
 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Sunbeam Management, LLC (“Sunbeam” or 
“Respondent”).   
 
II. 
 
 In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the 
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the 
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings 
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these 
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.   
 

2 
 
III. 
 
 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
 that: 
 
Summary 
 
1. These proceedings arise out of violations of the beneficial ownership reporting 
requirements of the federal securities laws.  Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1 
together require that any person who directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership of more 
than five percent of any voting class of equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange 
Act file a statement with the Commission.  During the relevant time, beneficial owners could 
comply with this requirement by filing a Schedule 13D with the Commission within 10 days after 
acquiring the requisite amount of beneficial ownership.  Whenever a material change occurred to 
the facts set forth in any Schedule 13D so filed, the disclosure statement was required to have been 
truthfully amended to reflect that material change and filed promptly. 
 
2. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires officers and directors of a company 
with a registered class of equity security, and any beneficial owners of greater than 10% of such 
class of equity security, to file certain reports of securities holdings and transactions.  Enactment of 
Section 16(a) was motivated by a belief that “the most potent weapon against the abuse of insider 
information is full and prompt publicity” and by a desire “to give investors an idea of the purchases 
and sales by insiders which may in turn indicate their private opinion as to prospects of the 
company.”
2
  The obligation to make Section 16 filings applies irrespective of profits or the filer’s 
reasons for engaging in the transactions.   
 
3. In March 2020, Respondent accepted shares of convertible preferred stock of OWC 
Pharmaceutical Research Corp. (“OWC”) in satisfaction of a dispute.  Each preferred share was 
eligible to be converted into 1,000 shares of OWC common stock.  As a result, Respondent was 
deemed to be a beneficial owner of the underlying OWC common stock.  When the amount of 
beneficial ownership attributable to the convertible preferred stock was combined with a small 
existing position in OWC common stock, Respondent beneficially owned more than 14% of OWC 
outstanding shares.  Respondent did not file a Schedule 13D or a Form 3 until May 2020.  Thus, 
Respondent violated Sections 13(d) and 16(a) and related rules.   
 
4. Thereafter, Respondent presented its convertible shares to OWC for conversion.  
However, OWC informed Respondent that it would not convert Respondent’s convertible shares 
into common stock.  As a result, Respondent no longer could be deemed to beneficially own the 
underlying common stock.  This decrease in the amount of beneficial ownership held represented a 
material change to the facts set forth in its filed Schedule 13D.  Respondent failed to amend that 
Schedule 13D and thus violated Section 13(d)(2) and Rule 13d-2. 
 
                                                 
1
 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent's Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person 
or entity in this or any other proceeding. 
 
2
 H.R. Rep. 73-1383, at 13, 24 (1934). 

3 
 
Respondent 
 
5. Sunbeam is a Maryland corporation based in Pikesville, Maryland. Sunbeam is 
primarily engaged in the business of management and consulting. 
 
Legal Framework 
  
6. Section 13(d)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1(a) thereunder together require 
any person who has directly or indirectly acquired beneficial ownership of more than five percent of 
any voting class of equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file a 
statement with the Commission disclosing certain information specified in a Schedule 13D.  During 
the relevant time, individuals or entities could comply with this requirement by filing a Schedule 
13D with the Commission within 10 days after they acquired the requisite amount of beneficial 
ownership.
3
  Section 13(d) allows shareholders and potential investors to evaluate changes in 
substantial shareholdings.
4
   
 
7. During the time period relevant to this matter, Section 13(d)(2) of the Exchange Act 
and Rule 13d-2(a) thereunder required a person who had filed a Schedule 13D to file an amendment 
“promptly”
5
 if any material change occurred in the facts set forth in that filing, including but not 
limited to, any material increase or decrease in the percentage of the class beneficially owned.  An 
acquisition or disposition of beneficial ownership of securities in an amount equal to one percent or 
more of a class of equity securities is deemed material by Rule 13d-2(a). 
 
8. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 16a-3 apply to every officer, director, 
and greater than 10% beneficial owner
6
 of any class of equity security registered pursuant to 
                                                 
3
 On October 10, 2023, the Commission adopted amendments to the rules governing beneficial ownership reporting 
under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) to update and shorten certain filing deadlines (the “2023 
Amendments”).  Modernization of Beneficial Ownership Reporting, SEC Release No. 34-98704 (Oct. 10, 2023), 88 
Fed. Reg. 76896 (Nov. 7, 2023).  Among other provisions, the 2023 Amendments shortened the deadline for filing 
the initial statement on Schedule 13D from 10 days to five business days, which became effective on February 5, 
2024.  Id. at 76897, 76906. 
 
4
 See generally GAF Corp. v. Milstein, 453 F.2d 709, 717 (2d Cir. 1971) cert. denied, 406 U.S. 910 (1972); see also 
SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1167 (D.C. Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 (1979), citing, S. Rep. 
No. 550, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 (1967) and H.R. Rep. No. 1711, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 (1968) (“The purpose of 
section 13(d) is to require disclosure of information by persons who have acquired a substantial interest, or increased 
their interest in the equity securities of a company by a substantial amount, within a relatively short period of 
time.”). 
 
5
 Although the term “promptly” was not defined under the rules in effect at the time of the violation, any delay in 
filing beyond the date the filing reasonably could have been made may not have been prompt. Amendments to 
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements, SEC Rel. No. 34-39538, 1998 WL 7449, at *3 n.14 (Jan. 12, 1998). 
   
6
 For purposes of determining who is a greater than 10% beneficial owner required to report under Section 16(a), 
Rule 16a-1(a)(1) incorporates the standards in Exchange Act Rule 13d-3, which specifies that a “beneficial owner” 
includes any person who directly or indirectly has or shares voting or investment power, regardless of whether they 
have any economic interest in the securities.  More than one person may be a beneficial owner of the same securities.   
 
 

4 
 
Exchange Act Section 12 (collectively referred to herein as “insiders”).  Pursuant to Rule 16a-3(a), 
insiders are required to file initial statements of holdings on Form 3 and keep this information 
current by reporting transactions on Forms 4 and 5.  Specifically, Section 16(a)(2) of the Exchange 
Act and Rule 16a-3 thereunder require that within 10 days after becoming an insider, or on or 
before the effective date of the Section 12 registration of the class of equity security, an insider 
must file a Form 3 report disclosing his or her beneficial ownership of all securities of the issuer.  
These same provisions require that insiders also file Form 4 reports disclosing certain transactions 
resulting in a change in beneficial ownership within two business days following the execution 
date of the transaction. Pursuant to Rule 16a-3(g)(1), transactions required to be reported on Form 
4 include purchases and sales of securities, exercises and conversions of derivative securities, and 
grants or awards of securities from the issuer.  In addition, according to Rule 16a-3(f)(1), insiders 
are required to file a Form 5 report within 45 days after the issuer’s fiscal year-end to report any 
transactions or holdings that should have been, but were not, reported on Form 3 or 4 (as 
applicable) during the issuer’s most recent fiscal year and any transactions eligible for deferred 
reporting (unless the corporate insider has previously reported all such transactions). 
 
9. There is no state of mind requirement for violations of Sections 13(d) and 16(a) and 
the rules thereunder.
7
  The failure to timely file a required report, even if inadvertent, constitutes a 
violation.
8
  
 
Facts 
 
10. On March 23, 2020, Respondent acquired 43,675 shares of convertible preferred 
stock of OWC.  These shares were eligible to be converted into common stock at a ratio of 1,000 
shares of common stock for each share of preferred stock.  As a result, Respondent was deemed to 
acquire beneficial ownership of 43,675,000 shares of common stock.  At the time, Respondent 
already owned an additional 500,000 shares of OWC common stock.  Thus, in total, as of March 
23, 2020, Respondent had beneficial ownership of 14.1% of outstanding OWC common stock. 
 
11. On May 18, 2020, Respondent filed a Schedule 13D to report its beneficial 
ownership position in OWC common stock.  Respondent represented the date of event that 
required filing (“Event Date”) of a Schedule 13D was March 23, 2020, which was the date it 
acquired the OWC convertible preferred shares. 
 
12. Respondent further reported that its ownership of the OWC preferred stock “carries 
voting rights equivalent to 43,675,000 shares of Common Stock.”  Respondent also represented 
                                                 
7
 See, e.g., Savoy Indus., 587 F.2d at 1167 (“Indeed, the plain language of section 13(d)(1) gives no hint that 
intentional conduct need be found, but rather, appears to place a simple and affirmative duty of reporting on certain 
persons.”); SEC v. e-Smart Technologies, Inc., 82 F. Supp. 3d 97, 104 (D.D.C. 2015) (scienter is not required to 
establish a violation of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act). 
 
8
 Cf. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 47 SEC 286, 1980 WL 26901, at *1–2 (May 19, 1980) (Commission opinion) (“We 
have previously held that the failure to make a required report, even though inadvertent, constitutes a willful 
violation”); Herbert Moskowitz, 77 SEC 446, 2002 WL 434524, at *7 (Mar. 21, 2002) (Commission opinion) 
(“evidence of both motive for non-disclosure and actual market impact ... is irrelevant” to whether violations of 
Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder occurred). 
 

5 
 
that it “is deemed to be the beneficial owner” and it “has the sole power to vote or direct the vote, 
and dispose or direct the disposition, of” 44,175,000 shares of OWC common stock.   
 
13. Finally, Respondent attached a Form 8-K filed by OWC, which disclosed that the 
preferred shares could be converted “provided that, at the time of conversion there were a 
sufficient number of shares of authorized but unissued shares of common stock that were not 
reserved for other purposes.”  Respondent did not otherwise discuss the conditional nature of the 
preferred shares or the likelihood of converting those shares, nor did it disclaim beneficial 
ownership of the underlying common shares, as it was permitted to do pursuant to Rule 13d-4 of 
Regulation 13D-G, due to the conversion contingency. 
 
14. Respondent should have filed a Schedule 13D within 10 days of the Event Date.  
As a result, the May 18, 2020 Schedule 13D was untimely. 
 
15. On May 11, 2020, Respondent filed a Form 3 disclosing a position which included 
43,675 shares of convertible preferred stock and 500,000 shares of common stock and an Event 
Date of March 23, 2020.  Finally, as to its “Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer,” 
Respondent indicated it was a “10% Owner.” 
 
16. Respondent’s Form 3 should have been filed within 10 days of the Event Date.  As 
a result, the May 11, 2020 Form 3 was untimely. 
 
17. On May 20, 2020, two days after filing its Schedule 13D, through external counsel, 
Respondent presented its notice to OWC to convert its shares of convertible preferred stock into 
common stock.  However, as noted, the preferred shares were only convertible if there were a 
sufficient number of shares of authorized but unissued shares of common stock. Notwithstanding 
Respondent’s right to convert its preferred stock into the underlying common, on June 9, 2020, 
OWC responded to Respondent’s conversion notice, stating it would not convert Respondent’s 
preferred shares because there were not enough outstanding OWC shares to satisfy the conversion.   
 
18. As a result, Respondent no longer could be deemed the beneficial owner of the 
common stock underlying the preferred shares.  This decrease in the amount of beneficial 
ownership represented a material change to the facts set forth in its filed Schedule 13D.  Thus, 
Respondent was required to file, but never filed, an amendment to its Schedule 13D. 
 
19. Throughout the relevant time, Sunbeam consulted with counsel regarding its filing 
obligations. 
 
Violations 
 
20. As a result of the conduct described above, Sunbeam violated Sections 13(d)(1), 
13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 13d-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. 
 
 
 
 

6 
 
Cooperation 
 
21. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered cooperation 
afforded to the Commission staff.   
  
IV. 
 
 In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions 
agreed to in Respondent Sunbeam’s Offer. 
 
 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 
 
 A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Sunbeam Management, 
LLC cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of 
Sections 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 13d-2, and 16a-3 
thereunder. 
 
B. Respondent shall pay civil penalties of $40,000 to the Securities and Exchange 
Commission for transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act 
Section 21F(g)(3).  If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 
U.S.C. § 3717.  Payment shall be made in the following installments: $15,000 within 14 days of 
the entry of the Order; $10,000 within 120 days of the entry of the Order; $10,000 within 240 days 
of the entry of the Order, and $5,000, within 360 days of the entry of the Order. Payments shall be 
applied first to post order interest, which accrues pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717. Prior to making the 
final payment set forth herein, Respondent shall contact the staff of the Commission for the amount 
due. If Respondent fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed 
according to the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Order, including 
post-order interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the 
discretion of the staff of the Commission without further application to the Commission. 
 
Payment must be made in one of the following ways:   
 
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which 
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  
 
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov 
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  
 
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United 
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange 
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:  
 
  

7 
 
Enterprise Services Center 
Accounts Receivable Branch 
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 
 
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying 
Sunbeam as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy 
of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to D. Mark Cave, Associate Director, 
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F St., NE, Washington, DC 
20549.  
 
 C. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be 
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 
award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a 
Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting 
the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission's counsel in this action, and pay the amount of the 
Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be deemed 
an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty 
imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a 
private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors based 
on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this 
proceeding. 
 
 
 By the Commission. 
 
 
 
Vanessa A. Countryman 
Secretary 
 
 
OCR text (19,424c · tika · 95% conf)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 101176 / September 25, 2024        

 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-22192 

 

 

In the Matter of 

 

Sunbeam Management, LLC 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-

DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING 

FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-

AND-DESIST ORDER 

  

I. 

 

 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-

and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Sunbeam Management, LLC (“Sunbeam” or 

“Respondent”).   

 

II. 

 

 In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 

of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the 

purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the 

Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings 

herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these 

proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-

and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 

Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.   

 



2 

 

III. 

 

 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that: 

 

Summary 

 

1. These proceedings arise out of violations of the beneficial ownership reporting 

requirements of the federal securities laws.  Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1 

together require that any person who directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership of more 

than five percent of any voting class of equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange 

Act file a statement with the Commission.  During the relevant time, beneficial owners could 

comply with this requirement by filing a Schedule 13D with the Commission within 10 days after 

acquiring the requisite amount of beneficial ownership.  Whenever a material change occurred to 

the facts set forth in any Schedule 13D so filed, the disclosure statement was required to have been 

truthfully amended to reflect that material change and filed promptly. 

 

2. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires officers and directors of a company 

with a registered class of equity security, and any beneficial owners of greater than 10% of such 

class of equity security, to file certain reports of securities holdings and transactions.  Enactment of 

Section 16(a) was motivated by a belief that “the most potent weapon against the abuse of insider 

information is full and prompt publicity” and by a desire “to give investors an idea of the purchases 

and sales by insiders which may in turn indicate their private opinion as to prospects of the 

company.”2  The obligation to make Section 16 filings applies irrespective of profits or the filer’s 

reasons for engaging in the transactions.   

 

3. In March 2020, Respondent accepted shares of convertible preferred stock of OWC 

Pharmaceutical Research Corp. (“OWC”) in satisfaction of a dispute.  Each preferred share was 

eligible to be converted into 1,000 shares of OWC common stock.  As a result, Respondent was 

deemed to be a beneficial owner of the underlying OWC common stock.  When the amount of 

beneficial ownership attributable to the convertible preferred stock was combined with a small 

existing position in OWC common stock, Respondent beneficially owned more than 14% of OWC 

outstanding shares.  Respondent did not file a Schedule 13D or a Form 3 until May 2020.  Thus, 

Respondent violated Sections 13(d) and 16(a) and related rules.   

 

4. Thereafter, Respondent presented its convertible shares to OWC for conversion.  

However, OWC informed Respondent that it would not convert Respondent’s convertible shares 

into common stock.  As a result, Respondent no longer could be deemed to beneficially own the 

underlying common stock.  This decrease in the amount of beneficial ownership held represented a 

material change to the facts set forth in its filed Schedule 13D.  Respondent failed to amend that 

Schedule 13D and thus violated Section 13(d)(2) and Rule 13d-2. 

 

                                                 
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent's Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person 

or entity in this or any other proceeding. 

 
2 H.R. Rep. 73-1383, at 13, 24 (1934). 



3 

 

Respondent 

 

5. Sunbeam is a Maryland corporation based in Pikesville, Maryland. Sunbeam is 

primarily engaged in the business of management and consulting. 

 

Legal Framework 

  

6. Section 13(d)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1(a) thereunder together require 

any person who has directly or indirectly acquired beneficial ownership of more than five percent of 

any voting class of equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file a 

statement with the Commission disclosing certain information specified in a Schedule 13D.  During 

the relevant time, individuals or entities could comply with this requirement by filing a Schedule 

13D with the Commission within 10 days after they acquired the requisite amount of beneficial 

ownership.3  Section 13(d) allows shareholders and potential investors to evaluate changes in 

substantial shareholdings.4   

 

7. During the time period relevant to this matter, Section 13(d)(2) of the Exchange Act 

and Rule 13d-2(a) thereunder required a person who had filed a Schedule 13D to file an amendment 

“promptly”5 if any material change occurred in the facts set forth in that filing, including but not 

limited to, any material increase or decrease in the percentage of the class beneficially owned.  An 

acquisition or disposition of beneficial ownership of securities in an amount equal to one percent or 

more of a class of equity securities is deemed material by Rule 13d-2(a). 

 

8. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 16a-3 apply to every officer, director, 

and greater than 10% beneficial owner6 of any class of equity security registered pursuant to 

                                                 
3 On October 10, 2023, the Commission adopted amendments to the rules governing beneficial ownership reporting 

under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) to update and shorten certain filing deadlines (the “2023 

Amendments”).  Modernization of Beneficial Ownership Reporting, SEC Release No. 34-98704 (Oct. 10, 2023), 88 

Fed. Reg. 76896 (Nov. 7, 2023).  Among other provisions, the 2023 Amendments shortened the deadline for filing 

the initial statement on Schedule 13D from 10 days to five business days, which became effective on February 5, 

2024.  Id. at 76897, 76906. 

 
4 See generally GAF Corp. v. Milstein, 453 F.2d 709, 717 (2d Cir. 1971) cert. denied, 406 U.S. 910 (1972); see also 

SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1167 (D.C. Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 (1979), citing, S. Rep. 

No. 550, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 (1967) and H.R. Rep. No. 1711, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 (1968) (“The purpose of 

section 13(d) is to require disclosure of information by persons who have acquired a substantial interest, or increased 

their interest in the equity securities of a company by a substantial amount, within a relatively short period of 

time.”). 

 
5 Although the term “promptly” was not defined under the rules in effect at the time of the violation, any delay in 

filing beyond the date the filing reasonably could have been made may not have been prompt. Amendments to 

Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements, SEC Rel. No. 34-39538, 1998 WL 7449, at *3 n.14 (Jan. 12, 1998). 

   
6 For purposes of determining who is a greater than 10% beneficial owner required to report under Section 16(a), 

Rule 16a-1(a)(1) incorporates the standards in Exchange Act Rule 13d-3, which specifies that a “beneficial owner” 

includes any person who directly or indirectly has or shares voting or investment power, regardless of whether they 

have any economic interest in the securities.  More than one person may be a beneficial owner of the same securities.   

 

 



4 

 

Exchange Act Section 12 (collectively referred to herein as “insiders”).  Pursuant to Rule 16a-3(a), 

insiders are required to file initial statements of holdings on Form 3 and keep this information 

current by reporting transactions on Forms 4 and 5.  Specifically, Section 16(a)(2) of the Exchange 

Act and Rule 16a-3 thereunder require that within 10 days after becoming an insider, or on or 

before the effective date of the Section 12 registration of the class of equity security, an insider 

must file a Form 3 report disclosing his or her beneficial ownership of all securities of the issuer.  

These same provisions require that insiders also file Form 4 reports disclosing certain transactions 

resulting in a change in beneficial ownership within two business days following the execution 

date of the transaction. Pursuant to Rule 16a-3(g)(1), transactions required to be reported on Form 

4 include purchases and sales of securities, exercises and conversions of derivative securities, and 

grants or awards of securities from the issuer.  In addition, according to Rule 16a-3(f)(1), insiders 

are required to file a Form 5 report within 45 days after the issuer’s fiscal year-end to report any 

transactions or holdings that should have been, but were not, reported on Form 3 or 4 (as 

applicable) during the issuer’s most recent fiscal year and any transactions eligible for deferred 

reporting (unless the corporate insider has previously reported all such transactions). 

 

9. There is no state of mind requirement for violations of Sections 13(d) and 16(a) and 

the rules thereunder.7  The failure to timely file a required report, even if inadvertent, constitutes a 

violation.8  

 

Facts 

 

10. On March 23, 2020, Respondent acquired 43,675 shares of convertible preferred 

stock of OWC.  These shares were eligible to be converted into common stock at a ratio of 1,000 

shares of common stock for each share of preferred stock.  As a result, Respondent was deemed to 

acquire beneficial ownership of 43,675,000 shares of common stock.  At the time, Respondent 

already owned an additional 500,000 shares of OWC common stock.  Thus, in total, as of March 

23, 2020, Respondent had beneficial ownership of 14.1% of outstanding OWC common stock. 

 

11. On May 18, 2020, Respondent filed a Schedule 13D to report its beneficial 

ownership position in OWC common stock.  Respondent represented the date of event that 

required filing (“Event Date”) of a Schedule 13D was March 23, 2020, which was the date it 

acquired the OWC convertible preferred shares. 

 

12. Respondent further reported that its ownership of the OWC preferred stock “carries 

voting rights equivalent to 43,675,000 shares of Common Stock.”  Respondent also represented 

                                                 
7 See, e.g., Savoy Indus., 587 F.2d at 1167 (“Indeed, the plain language of section 13(d)(1) gives no hint that 

intentional conduct need be found, but rather, appears to place a simple and affirmative duty of reporting on certain 

persons.”); SEC v. e-Smart Technologies, Inc., 82 F. Supp. 3d 97, 104 (D.D.C. 2015) (scienter is not required to 

establish a violation of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act). 

 
8 Cf. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 47 SEC 286, 1980 WL 26901, at *1–2 (May 19, 1980) (Commission opinion) (“We 

have previously held that the failure to make a required report, even though inadvertent, constitutes a willful 

violation”); Herbert Moskowitz, 77 SEC 446, 2002 WL 434524, at *7 (Mar. 21, 2002) (Commission opinion) 

(“evidence of both motive for non-disclosure and actual market impact … is irrelevant” to whether violations of 

Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder occurred). 

 



5 

 

that it “is deemed to be the beneficial owner” and it “has the sole power to vote or direct the vote, 

and dispose or direct the disposition, of” 44,175,000 shares of OWC common stock.   

 

13. Finally, Respondent attached a Form 8-K filed by OWC, which disclosed that the 

preferred shares could be converted “provided that, at the time of conversion there were a 

sufficient number of shares of authorized but unissued shares of common stock that were not 

reserved for other purposes.”  Respondent did not otherwise discuss the conditional nature of the 

preferred shares or the likelihood of converting those shares, nor did it disclaim beneficial 

ownership of the underlying common shares, as it was permitted to do pursuant to Rule 13d-4 of 

Regulation 13D-G, due to the conversion contingency. 

 

14. Respondent should have filed a Schedule 13D within 10 days of the Event Date.  

As a result, the May 18, 2020 Schedule 13D was untimely. 

 

15. On May 11, 2020, Respondent filed a Form 3 disclosing a position which included 

43,675 shares of convertible preferred stock and 500,000 shares of common stock and an Event 

Date of March 23, 2020.  Finally, as to its “Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer,” 

Respondent indicated it was a “10% Owner.” 

 

16. Respondent’s Form 3 should have been filed within 10 days of the Event Date.  As 

a result, the May 11, 2020 Form 3 was untimely. 

 

17. On May 20, 2020, two days after filing its Schedule 13D, through external counsel, 

Respondent presented its notice to OWC to convert its shares of convertible preferred stock into 

common stock.  However, as noted, the preferred shares were only convertible if there were a 

sufficient number of shares of authorized but unissued shares of common stock. Notwithstanding 

Respondent’s right to convert its preferred stock into the underlying common, on June 9, 2020, 

OWC responded to Respondent’s conversion notice, stating it would not convert Respondent’s 

preferred shares because there were not enough outstanding OWC shares to satisfy the conversion.   

 

18. As a result, Respondent no longer could be deemed the beneficial owner of the 

common stock underlying the preferred shares.  This decrease in the amount of beneficial 

ownership represented a material change to the facts set forth in its filed Schedule 13D.  Thus, 

Respondent was required to file, but never filed, an amendment to its Schedule 13D. 

 

19. Throughout the relevant time, Sunbeam consulted with counsel regarding its filing 

obligations. 

 

Violations 

 

20. As a result of the conduct described above, Sunbeam violated Sections 13(d)(1), 

13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 13d-2, and 16a-3 thereunder. 

 

 

 

 



6 

 

Cooperation 

 

21. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered cooperation 

afforded to the Commission staff.   

  

IV. 

 

 In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions 

agreed to in Respondent Sunbeam’s Offer. 

 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

 

 A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Sunbeam Management, 

LLC cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of 

Sections 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1, 13d-2, and 16a-3 

thereunder. 

 

B. Respondent shall pay civil penalties of $40,000 to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission for transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act 

Section 21F(g)(3).  If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 

U.S.C. § 3717.  Payment shall be made in the following installments: $15,000 within 14 days of 

the entry of the Order; $10,000 within 120 days of the entry of the Order; $10,000 within 240 days 

of the entry of the Order, and $5,000, within 360 days of the entry of the Order. Payments shall be 

applied first to post order interest, which accrues pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717. Prior to making the 

final payment set forth herein, Respondent shall contact the staff of the Commission for the amount 

due. If Respondent fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed 

according to the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Order, including 

post-order interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the 

discretion of the staff of the Commission without further application to the Commission. 

 

Payment must be made in one of the following ways:   

 

(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which 

will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  

 

(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov 

through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  

 

(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United 

States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:  

 

  

http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm


7 

 

Enterprise Services Center 

Accounts Receivable Branch 

HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

 

Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying 

Sunbeam as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy 

of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to D. Mark Cave, Associate Director, 

Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F St., NE, Washington, DC 

20549.  

 

 C. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be 

treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 

preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 

Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 

award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 

penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a 

Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting 

the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission's counsel in this action, and pay the amount of the 

Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be deemed 

an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty 

imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a 

private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors based 

on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this 

proceeding. 

 

 

 By the Commission. 

 

 

 

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary 

 

 


	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
	IV.