2024-09-17 SEC Press pdf 108 KB 19,273 chars

In re ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE

summary

Zions Public Finance, Inc

paragraph

Zions Public Finance, Inc. is accused of violating federal securities laws by failing to maintain and preserve written communications relating to municipal advisory activities. The alleged fraud involved employees, including senior levels, using unapproved electronic communication methods, such as text messages, to communicate internally and externally from July 2020 to October 2023. Zions Public Finance is charged with violating Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act, Rule 15Ba1-8, and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9, and G-44. The outcome is a cease-and-desist order, a censure, and a civil money penalty of $47,000, with $11,750 to be transferred to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and $35,250 to the general fund of the United States Treasury.

narrative

Zions Public Finance, Inc. is accused of violating federal securities laws by failing to maintain and preserve written communications relating to municipal advisory activities. The alleged fraud involved employees, including senior levels, using unapproved electronic communication methods, such as text messages, to communicate internally and externally from July 2020 to October 2023. Zions Public Finance is charged with violating Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act, Rule 15Ba1-8, and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9, and G-44. The outcome is a cease-and-desist order, a censure, and a civil money penalty of $47,000, with $11,750 to be transferred to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and $35,250 to the general fund of the United States Treasury. Zions Public Finance, Inc., a registered municipal advisor, violated federal securities laws and MSRB rules by failing to preserve written communications related to municipal advisory activities, particularly through unapproved off-channel channels like text messages, from July 2020 to October 2023. The firm’s senior employees, including supervisors, engaged in and facilitated these recordkeeping failures despite having policies requiring use of approved, monitored systems and self-certification of compliance—measures that were inadequately supervised or verified. As a result, Zions Public Finance violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act, Rule 15Ba1-8, MSRB Rules G-8, G-9, and G-44, and Section 15B(c)(1), due to deficient supervisory systems. The SEC accepted Zions’ settlement offer, imposing a $47,000 civil penalty (with $11,750 paid to the MSRB), a censure, and mandatory undertakings including revised policies, expert-led training, and ongoing compliance certification. Zions also committed to providing firm-issued, monitored mobile devices and enhancing its recordkeeping infrastructure. Zions Public Finance, Inc., a registered municipal advisor, violated federal securities laws and MSRB rules by failing to preserve written communications related to municipal advisory activities, particularly through unapproved off-channel channels like text messages, between July 2020 and October 2023. The misconduct involved employees at all levels, including supervisors, who sent and received sensitive advisory communications—such as bond sale strategies and interest capitalization advice—without retaining them, breaching recordkeeping requirements under Section 17(a), Rule 15Ba1-8, and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9, and G-44. The SEC found that Zions’ supervisory system, which relied solely on self-certifications without verification, was inadequate and constituted a willful violation of its duty to maintain a reasonably designed compliance system. As part of the settlement, Zions agreed to a $47,000 civil penalty ($11,750 to the MSRB, $35,250 to the U.S. Treasury), a censure, and mandatory undertakings including new policies, expert-led training, and implementation of monitored firm-issued devices. The SEC accepted the settlement due to Zions’ cooperation and remedial actions, including enhanced technology and compliance protocols.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
broker-dealer-fraud (85%)
Outcome
charged
Civil penalty
$47,000
Classified broker-dealer-fraud(confidence 85%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D· recall 29% / precision 9%. detection rule →
Statutes
31 U.S.C. §3717SECTIONS 15B AND 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTSECTIONS 15B AND 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE, INC.
Keywords
public financezions publicpublicmunicipalfinancezionsmunicipal advisoryadvisory activitiesexchangecommissionmunicipal advisorrespondentcommunicationsmunicipal advisorssecurities exchange

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 3
  • $47K $47,000 $10K–$100K
  • $35K $35,250 $10K–$100K
  • $12K $11,750 $10K–$100K
Entities 2
  • person recordkeeping requirements
  • person written communications
Triples 8
  • Commission determined to accept Offer
  • Respondent admits facts set forth in Section III
  • Respondent acknowledges its conduct violated the federal securities laws
  • Commission finds Zions Public Finance violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8, MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9
  • Zions Public Finance employees failed to adhere to recordkeeping requirements
  • Zions Public Finance did not maintain written communications
  • Zions Public Finance violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act
  • Zions Public Finance supervisors failed to comply with recordkeeping requirements
Text layers
Extracted body text (19,273c)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
Before the 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
Release No. 101048 / September 17, 2024 
 
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 
File No. 3-22128 
 
 
 
In the Matter of 
 
ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE, INC.,  
 
Respondent. 
 
ORDER INSTITUTING 
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-
AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS 
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15B AND 
21C OF THE SECURITIES 
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING 
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING 
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A 
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER  
 
I. 
 
 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in 
the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby 
are, instituted pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(“Exchange Act”) against Zions Public Finance, Inc. (“Zions Public Finance” or “Respondent”).  
 
II. 
 
 In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 
of Settlement (“Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Respondent admits the 
facts set forth in Section III below, acknowledges that its conduct violated the federal securities 
laws, admits the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, 
and consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist 
Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 
Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth 
below. 
 
III. 
 
 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
 that: 
                                           
1
 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not 
binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding. 

 2 
Summary 
 
1. The federal securities laws impose recordkeeping requirements on municipal 
advisors, which are intended to facilitate the Commission’s inspections and examinations of 
municipal advisors and assist the Commission in evaluating a municipal advisor’s compliance with 
the applicable federal securities laws, including the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking 
Board (“MSRB”).  These recordkeeping requirements require, among other things, that municipal 
advisors maintain and preserve all written communications relating to municipal advisory activities 
for at least five years.  
 
2. These proceedings arise out of the failure of Zions Public Finance employees 
throughout the firm, including at senior levels, to adhere to these recordkeeping requirements and 
the firm’s own policies.  Using unapproved electronic communication methods, these employees 
communicated with regard to municipal advisory activities both internally and externally by text 
messages (“off-channel communications”).   
 
3. From at least July 2020 to October 2023 (the “relevant period”), multiple employees 
of Zions Public Finance sent and received off-channel communications relating to municipal 
advisory activities.  Zions Public Finance did not maintain or preserve these written 
communications.  Zions Public Finance’s failure involved employees at various levels of authority, 
including both municipal advisor representatives and municipal advisor principals.
2
  As a result, 
Zions Public Finance violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 thereunder, and 
MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9.   
 
4. Some of Zions Public Finance’s supervisors, who were responsible for preventing 
this misconduct, themselves failed to comply with these recordkeeping requirements, as well as the 
firm’s own policies, by sending and receiving off-channel communications relating to municipal 
advisory activities.  Zions Public Finance failed to implement and maintain a system to supervise 
the municipal advisory activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons that is 
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable recordkeeping requirements.  As a 
result, Zions Public Finance violated MSRB Rule G-44.  By violating MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and 
G-44, Zions Public Finance violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act.    
 
Respondent 
 
 5.  Zions Public Finance, Inc. is a Utah corporation headquartered in Salt Lake City, 
Utah.  Zions Public Finance has been registered with the Commission and the MSRB as a 
municipal advisor since December 2014 and was registered during the relevant time period. 
 
                                           
2
  MSRB Rule G-3(d)(i)(A) defines a “municipal advisor representative” to mean a natural person 
associated with a municipal advisor who engages in municipal advisory activities on the municipal 
advisor’s behalf, other than a person performing only clerical, administrative, support or similar 
functions.  MSRB Rule G-3(e)(i) defines a “municipal advisor principal” to mean a natural person 
associated with a municipal advisor who is directly engaged in the management, direction or supervision 
of the municipal advisory activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons. 

 3 
                         Recordkeeping Requirements for Municipal Advisors 
 
 6. Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act requires municipal advisors to make and 
keep for prescribed periods such records, furnish such copies thereof, and make and disseminate 
such reports as the Commission, by rule, prescribes as necessary or appropriate in the public 
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the Exchange Act.  
Exchange Act Rule 15Ba1-8 requires that municipal advisors make and keep true, accurate, and 
current originals or copies of all written communications received, and originals or copies of all 
written communications sent, by such municipal advisor relating to municipal advisory activities, 
regardless of the format of such communications, and for such records to be maintained and 
preserved for a period of not less than five years, the first two years in easily accessible places.   
 
 7. MSRB Rule G-8(h)(i) requires municipal advisors to make and keep current all 
books and records described in Exchange Act Rule 15Ba1-8(a)(1)-(8), which includes all written 
communications relating to municipal advisory activities.  MSRB Rule G-9(h)(i) requires the 
municipal advisor to preserve these records for a period of not less than five years.   
 
 8. Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act prohibits municipal advisors from 
engaging in any act, practice, or course of business that is in contravention of any rule of the 
MSRB. 
 
Policies and Procedures 
 
 9. During the relevant period, Zions Public Finance maintained certain policies and 
procedures designed to ensure the maintenance and retention of municipal advisory-related 
records, including electronic communications, in compliance with the relevant recordkeeping 
provisions.  Zions Public Finance’s policies notified employees that all electronic 
communications were required to be retained.  Zions Public Finance’s policies and procedures 
required all registered employees, including senior employees, to attend annual trainings on the 
firm’s policies. 
 
 10. Zions Public Finance’s employees were advised that the use of unapproved 
electronic communications methods was not permitted, and that they should limit messaging 
relating to municipal advisory activities to the firm’s systems.   
 
 11. Messages sent through firm-approved communications methods were monitored, 
subject to review, and, when appropriate, archived.  Messages sent through unapproved 
communications methods were not monitored, subject to review or archived. 
 
 12. Zions Public Finance had procedures for all employees, including supervisors, 
requiring self-certification of compliance with the electronic communications policies.  Zions 
Public Finance did not have adequate processes in place to review, test or modify its reliance on 
employees’ self-certifications.   
 

 4 
 13. All of Zions Public Finance’s employees that sent or received off-channel 
communications, including supervisors, certified that they were in compliance with the 
electronic communications policies yet did not follow these policies.  Zions Public Finance’s 
reliance on employees’ self-certification was not reasonably designed to achieve compliance 
with recordkeeping requirements because it was not reliable absent appropriate follow-up 
measures.  Accordingly, Zions Public Finance’s supervisory system was not reasonably designed 
to achieve compliance with recordkeeping requirements. 
 
Recordkeeping Failures 
 
 14. In July 2023, the Commission staff commenced a risk-based initiative to 
investigate whether municipal advisors were properly retaining messages related to municipal 
advisory activities that were sent and/or received by employees using unapproved electronic 
communication methods.  Zions Public Finance cooperated with the investigation by voluntarily 
gathering and reviewing messages found on employees’ electronic devices.   
 
 15. The Commission staff’s investigation uncovered off-channel communications at 
all seniority levels of Zions Public Finance.  The investigation determined that, during the 
relevant period, multiple Zions Public Finance personnel had engaged in off-channel 
communications relating to municipal advisory activities involving both other employees of 
Zions Public Finance and external contacts that were not preserved. 
 
 16. For example, a senior employee at Zions Public Finance sent a text to a municipal 
issuer client explaining how negotiated bond sales work and how they differ from competitive 
bond sales, including the ability to give retail priority, and offering to support the use of 
negotiated sale for the next bond offering.  In another example, another senior employee at Zions 
Public Finance sent a text to a municipal issuer client explaining the option to capitalize the 
initial interest payments and earn additional interest on the project account. 
 
Violations 
   
17. As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Zions 
Public Finance willfully
3
 violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 
thereunder and MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9, which require municipal advisors to make and 
                                           
3
  “Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 15B of the Exchange Act, “‘means no 
more than that the person charged with the duty knows what he is doing.’”  Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 
408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)).  There is no 
requirement that the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.”  Tager v. SEC, 
344 F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965).  The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed the term 
“willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not alter that standard.  922 
F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing required to establish that a person has 
“willfully omit[ted]” material information from a required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the 
Advisers Act). 
 

 5 
preserve for at least five years originals or copies of all written communications received or sent 
relating to municipal advisory activities.   
 
18.  As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Zions 
Public Finance willfully violated MSRB Rule G-44, which requires municipal advisors to, 
among other things, implement, and maintain a system to supervise the municipal advisory 
activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons that is reasonably designed to 
achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, including applicable MSRB 
rules.   
 
19. As a result of Zions Public Finance’s willful violations of MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 
and G-44, Zions Public Finance willfully violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act, which 
prohibits municipal advisors from making use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of 
interstate commerce to provide advice to or on behalf of a municipal entity or obligated person 
with respect to municipal financial products, the issuance of municipal securities, or to undertake 
a solicitation of a municipal entity or obligated person, in contravention of any rule of the 
MSRB.   
 
Remedial Efforts 
 
 20. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial steps 
promptly undertaken by Zions Public Finance and the cooperation afforded the Commission staff.  
Prior to this action, Zions Public Finance enhanced its policies and procedures, began additional 
training concerning the use of approved communications methods and began implementing 
significant changes to the technology available to employees, including providing employees with 
firm-issued mobile devices that will be managed and monitored by Zions Public Finance.  
 
Undertakings 
 
 21. In addition, Respondent has undertaken to: 
 
a. Within 180 days of the entry of this Order: (i) establish reasonably designed 
written policies and procedures regarding the preservation of electronic communications;  
(ii) conduct a training of all associated persons who engage in municipal advisory 
activities regarding the preservation of electronic communications, to be provided by a 
person or entity with relevant expertise in the preservation of electronic communications 
and recordkeeping requirements under the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations 
thereunder, and under MSRB Rules; and (iii) establish a program of periodic training of all 
associated persons who engage in municipal advisory activities regarding the preservation 
of electronic communications.  The written policies and procedures should include the 
designation of a municipal advisor principal at Respondent responsible for ensuring 
compliance by Respondent with such policies and procedures and responsible for 

 6 
implementing and maintaining a record (including attendance) of the initial training and the 
periodic training program.  
 
b. Certify, in writing, compliance with the undertakings set forth above.  The 
certification shall: (i) identify the undertakings; (ii) provide written evidence of compliance 
with the undertakings in the form of a narrative; and (iii) be supported by exhibits sufficient 
to demonstrate compliance with the undertakings.  The Commission staff may make 
reasonable requests for further evidence of compliance with the undertakings, and 
Respondent agrees to provide such evidence at the time and in the manner specified by 
Commission staff or advise the Commission staff of any request for further evidence that 
Respondent considers unreasonable.  The certification, written evidence of compliance and 
supporting exhibits shall be submitted to LeeAnn Ghazil Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance 
Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, 33 Arch Street, 24
th
 Floor, Boston, MA 
02110, with a copy to the Office of Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later 
than the one-year anniversary of the date of this order.  
 
c. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the 
procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be 
counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday, 
the next business day shall be considered to be the last day. 
 
IV. 
 
 In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to 
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent Zions Public Finance’s Offer. 
 
 Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Exchange Act, it is hereby 
ORDERED that: 
 
  A. Respondent Zions Public Finance cease and desist from committing or causing 
any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 
thereunder and Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and G-44.   
 
 B. Respondent Zions Public Finance is censured. 
 
C. Respondent Zions Public Finance shall comply with the undertakings enumerated 
in paragraph 21 above. 
 
D. Respondent Zions Public Finance shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, 
pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $47,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
of which $11,750 shall be transferred to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board in accordance 
with Section 15B(c)(9)(A) of the Exchange Act, and of which the remaining $35,250 shall be 
transferred to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 
21F(g)(3).  If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 
§3717.  Payment must be made in one of the following ways: 
 

 7 
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which 
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  
 
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov 
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  
 
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United 
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange 
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:  
 
Enterprise Services Center 
Accounts Receivable Branch 
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 
 
 Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying 
Zions Public Finance, Inc. as the Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these 
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to LeeAnn Ghazil 
Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, Boston 
Regional Office, 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02110. 
 
E. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall 
be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 
award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such 
a Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order 
granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount 
of the Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be 
deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil 
penalty imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” 
means a private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more 
investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the 
Commission in this proceeding. 
 
 By the Commission. 
 
 
       Vanessa A. Countryman  
       Secretary  
OCR text (20,667c · tika · 95% conf)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 101048 / September 17, 2024 

 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-22128 
 

 

 

In the Matter of 
 

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE, INC.,  
 

Respondent. 
 

ORDER INSTITUTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-

AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS 

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15B AND 

21C OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING 

FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING 

REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A 

CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER  

 

I. 

 

 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in 

the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby 

are, instituted pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(“Exchange Act”) against Zions Public Finance, Inc. (“Zions Public Finance” or “Respondent”).  

 

II. 

 

 In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 

of Settlement (“Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Respondent admits the 

facts set forth in Section III below, acknowledges that its conduct violated the federal securities 

laws, admits the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, 

and consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth 

below. 

 

III. 

 

 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that: 

                                           
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not 

binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding. 



 2 

Summary 

 

1. The federal securities laws impose recordkeeping requirements on municipal 

advisors, which are intended to facilitate the Commission’s inspections and examinations of 

municipal advisors and assist the Commission in evaluating a municipal advisor’s compliance with 

the applicable federal securities laws, including the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking 

Board (“MSRB”).  These recordkeeping requirements require, among other things, that municipal 

advisors maintain and preserve all written communications relating to municipal advisory activities 

for at least five years.  

 

2. These proceedings arise out of the failure of Zions Public Finance employees 

throughout the firm, including at senior levels, to adhere to these recordkeeping requirements and 

the firm’s own policies.  Using unapproved electronic communication methods, these employees 

communicated with regard to municipal advisory activities both internally and externally by text 

messages (“off-channel communications”).   

 

3. From at least July 2020 to October 2023 (the “relevant period”), multiple employees 

of Zions Public Finance sent and received off-channel communications relating to municipal 

advisory activities.  Zions Public Finance did not maintain or preserve these written 

communications.  Zions Public Finance’s failure involved employees at various levels of authority, 

including both municipal advisor representatives and municipal advisor principals.2  As a result, 

Zions Public Finance violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 thereunder, and 

MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9.   

 

4. Some of Zions Public Finance’s supervisors, who were responsible for preventing 

this misconduct, themselves failed to comply with these recordkeeping requirements, as well as the 

firm’s own policies, by sending and receiving off-channel communications relating to municipal 

advisory activities.  Zions Public Finance failed to implement and maintain a system to supervise 

the municipal advisory activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons that is 

reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable recordkeeping requirements.  As a 

result, Zions Public Finance violated MSRB Rule G-44.  By violating MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and 

G-44, Zions Public Finance violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act.    

 

Respondent 

 

 5.  Zions Public Finance, Inc. is a Utah corporation headquartered in Salt Lake City, 

Utah.  Zions Public Finance has been registered with the Commission and the MSRB as a 

municipal advisor since December 2014 and was registered during the relevant time period. 

 

                                           
2  MSRB Rule G-3(d)(i)(A) defines a “municipal advisor representative” to mean a natural person 

associated with a municipal advisor who engages in municipal advisory activities on the municipal 

advisor’s behalf, other than a person performing only clerical, administrative, support or similar 

functions.  MSRB Rule G-3(e)(i) defines a “municipal advisor principal” to mean a natural person 

associated with a municipal advisor who is directly engaged in the management, direction or supervision 

of the municipal advisory activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons. 



 3 

                         Recordkeeping Requirements for Municipal Advisors 

 

 6. Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act requires municipal advisors to make and 

keep for prescribed periods such records, furnish such copies thereof, and make and disseminate 

such reports as the Commission, by rule, prescribes as necessary or appropriate in the public 

interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the Exchange Act.  

Exchange Act Rule 15Ba1-8 requires that municipal advisors make and keep true, accurate, and 

current originals or copies of all written communications received, and originals or copies of all 

written communications sent, by such municipal advisor relating to municipal advisory activities, 

regardless of the format of such communications, and for such records to be maintained and 

preserved for a period of not less than five years, the first two years in easily accessible places.   

 

 7. MSRB Rule G-8(h)(i) requires municipal advisors to make and keep current all 

books and records described in Exchange Act Rule 15Ba1-8(a)(1)-(8), which includes all written 

communications relating to municipal advisory activities.  MSRB Rule G-9(h)(i) requires the 

municipal advisor to preserve these records for a period of not less than five years.   

 

 8. Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act prohibits municipal advisors from 

engaging in any act, practice, or course of business that is in contravention of any rule of the 

MSRB. 

 

Policies and Procedures 

 

 9. During the relevant period, Zions Public Finance maintained certain policies and 

procedures designed to ensure the maintenance and retention of municipal advisory-related 

records, including electronic communications, in compliance with the relevant recordkeeping 

provisions.  Zions Public Finance’s policies notified employees that all electronic 

communications were required to be retained.  Zions Public Finance’s policies and procedures 

required all registered employees, including senior employees, to attend annual trainings on the 

firm’s policies. 

 

 10. Zions Public Finance’s employees were advised that the use of unapproved 

electronic communications methods was not permitted, and that they should limit messaging 

relating to municipal advisory activities to the firm’s systems.   

 

 11. Messages sent through firm-approved communications methods were monitored, 

subject to review, and, when appropriate, archived.  Messages sent through unapproved 

communications methods were not monitored, subject to review or archived. 

 

 12. Zions Public Finance had procedures for all employees, including supervisors, 

requiring self-certification of compliance with the electronic communications policies.  Zions 

Public Finance did not have adequate processes in place to review, test or modify its reliance on 

employees’ self-certifications.   

 



 4 

 13. All of Zions Public Finance’s employees that sent or received off-channel 

communications, including supervisors, certified that they were in compliance with the 

electronic communications policies yet did not follow these policies.  Zions Public Finance’s 

reliance on employees’ self-certification was not reasonably designed to achieve compliance 

with recordkeeping requirements because it was not reliable absent appropriate follow-up 

measures.  Accordingly, Zions Public Finance’s supervisory system was not reasonably designed 

to achieve compliance with recordkeeping requirements. 

 

Recordkeeping Failures 

 

 14. In July 2023, the Commission staff commenced a risk-based initiative to 

investigate whether municipal advisors were properly retaining messages related to municipal 

advisory activities that were sent and/or received by employees using unapproved electronic 

communication methods.  Zions Public Finance cooperated with the investigation by voluntarily 

gathering and reviewing messages found on employees’ electronic devices.   

 

 15. The Commission staff’s investigation uncovered off-channel communications at 

all seniority levels of Zions Public Finance.  The investigation determined that, during the 

relevant period, multiple Zions Public Finance personnel had engaged in off-channel 

communications relating to municipal advisory activities involving both other employees of 

Zions Public Finance and external contacts that were not preserved. 

 

 16. For example, a senior employee at Zions Public Finance sent a text to a municipal 

issuer client explaining how negotiated bond sales work and how they differ from competitive 

bond sales, including the ability to give retail priority, and offering to support the use of 

negotiated sale for the next bond offering.  In another example, another senior employee at Zions 

Public Finance sent a text to a municipal issuer client explaining the option to capitalize the 

initial interest payments and earn additional interest on the project account. 

 

Violations 

   

17. As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Zions 

Public Finance willfully3 violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 

thereunder and MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9, which require municipal advisors to make and 

                                           
3  “Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 15B of the Exchange Act, “‘means no 

more than that the person charged with the duty knows what he is doing.’”  Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 

408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)).  There is no 

requirement that the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.”  Tager v. SEC, 

344 F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965).  The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed the term 

“willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not alter that standard.  922 

F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing required to establish that a person has 

“willfully omit[ted]” material information from a required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the 

Advisers Act). 

 



 5 

preserve for at least five years originals or copies of all written communications received or sent 

relating to municipal advisory activities.   

 

18.  As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Zions 

Public Finance willfully violated MSRB Rule G-44, which requires municipal advisors to, 

among other things, implement, and maintain a system to supervise the municipal advisory 

activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons that is reasonably designed to 

achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, including applicable MSRB 

rules.   

 

19. As a result of Zions Public Finance’s willful violations of MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 

and G-44, Zions Public Finance willfully violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act, which 

prohibits municipal advisors from making use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of 

interstate commerce to provide advice to or on behalf of a municipal entity or obligated person 

with respect to municipal financial products, the issuance of municipal securities, or to undertake 

a solicitation of a municipal entity or obligated person, in contravention of any rule of the 

MSRB.   

 

Remedial Efforts 

 

 20. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial steps 

promptly undertaken by Zions Public Finance and the cooperation afforded the Commission staff.  

Prior to this action, Zions Public Finance enhanced its policies and procedures, began additional 

training concerning the use of approved communications methods and began implementing 

significant changes to the technology available to employees, including providing employees with 

firm-issued mobile devices that will be managed and monitored by Zions Public Finance.  

 

Undertakings 

 

 21. In addition, Respondent has undertaken to: 

 

a. Within 180 days of the entry of this Order: (i) establish reasonably designed 

written policies and procedures regarding the preservation of electronic communications;  

(ii) conduct a training of all associated persons who engage in municipal advisory 

activities regarding the preservation of electronic communications, to be provided by a 

person or entity with relevant expertise in the preservation of electronic communications 

and recordkeeping requirements under the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations 

thereunder, and under MSRB Rules; and (iii) establish a program of periodic training of all 

associated persons who engage in municipal advisory activities regarding the preservation 

of electronic communications.  The written policies and procedures should include the 

designation of a municipal advisor principal at Respondent responsible for ensuring 

compliance by Respondent with such policies and procedures and responsible for 



 6 

implementing and maintaining a record (including attendance) of the initial training and the 

periodic training program.  

 

b. Certify, in writing, compliance with the undertakings set forth above.  The 

certification shall: (i) identify the undertakings; (ii) provide written evidence of compliance 

with the undertakings in the form of a narrative; and (iii) be supported by exhibits sufficient 

to demonstrate compliance with the undertakings.  The Commission staff may make 

reasonable requests for further evidence of compliance with the undertakings, and 

Respondent agrees to provide such evidence at the time and in the manner specified by 

Commission staff or advise the Commission staff of any request for further evidence that 

Respondent considers unreasonable.  The certification, written evidence of compliance and 

supporting exhibits shall be submitted to LeeAnn Ghazil Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance 

Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 

02110, with a copy to the Office of Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later 

than the one-year anniversary of the date of this order.  

 

c. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the 

procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be 

counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday, 

the next business day shall be considered to be the last day. 

 

IV. 
 

 In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to 

impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent Zions Public Finance’s Offer. 

 

 Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Exchange Act, it is hereby 

ORDERED that: 
 

  A. Respondent Zions Public Finance cease and desist from committing or causing 

any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 

thereunder and Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and G-44.   
 

 B. Respondent Zions Public Finance is censured. 
 

C. Respondent Zions Public Finance shall comply with the undertakings enumerated 

in paragraph 21 above. 

 

D. Respondent Zions Public Finance shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, 

pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $47,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission, 

of which $11,750 shall be transferred to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board in accordance 

with Section 15B(c)(9)(A) of the Exchange Act, and of which the remaining $35,250 shall be 

transferred to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 

21F(g)(3).  If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 

§3717.  Payment must be made in one of the following ways: 

 



 7 

(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which 

will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  

 

(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov 

through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  

 

(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United 

States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:  

 

Enterprise Services Center 

Accounts Receivable Branch 

HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

 

 Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying 

Zions Public Finance, Inc. as the Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these 

proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to LeeAnn Ghazil 

Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, Boston 

Regional Office, 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02110. 
 

E. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall 

be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 

preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 

Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 

award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 

penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such 

a Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order 

granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount 

of the Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be 

deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil 

penalty imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” 

means a private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more 

investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the 

Commission in this proceeding. 

 

 By the Commission. 

 

 

       Vanessa A. Countryman  

       Secretary  


	20. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial steps promptly undertaken by Zions Public Finance and the cooperation afforded the Commission staff.  Prior to this action, Zions Public Finance enhanced its policies and proc...
	Undertakings
	21. In addition, Respondent has undertaken to:
	a. Within 180 days of the entry of this Order: (i) establish reasonably designed written policies and procedures regarding the preservation of electronic communications;  (ii) conduct a training of all associated persons who engage in municipal adviso...
	b. Certify, in writing, compliance with the undertakings set forth above.  The certification shall: (i) identify the undertakings; (ii) provide written evidence of compliance with the undertakings in the form of a narrative; and (iii) be supported by ...
	c. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal h...
	IV.