In re Certain
The SEC granted conditional waivers to 16 registered broker-dealers and investment advisers, including Cambridge, Guggenheim, and KeyBanc, for non-scienter record-keeping violations involving off-channel communications, allowing them to retain access to Securities Act exemptions after agreeing to cease-and-desist orders and compliance reforms without monetary penalties.
Sixteen SEC-registered broker-dealers, investment advisers, and dual-registered firms admitted to non-scienter violations of record-keeping rules under Sections 17(a) and 204 of the Exchange Act and Advisers Act by failing to preserve electronic communications. These violations triggered automatic disqualifications from exemptions under Regulations A, D, E, and Crowdfunding, prompting the SEC to issue conditional waivers. The firms agreed to cease-and-desist orders, retain compliance consultants to overhaul recordkeeping systems, and implement remedial measures—without paying monetary penalties—in exchange for reinstatement of their exemption eligibility.
The SEC granted conditional waivers to 16 registered broker-dealers, investment advisers, and dual-registered entities—including Cambridge Investment Research, Guggenheim Securities, KeyBanc Capital Markets, and Lincoln Financial—for non-scienter violations of federal record-keeping requirements. These firms failed to preserve business-related electronic communications, violating Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) for broker-dealers, and Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(7) for investment advisers. As a result, they automatically lost eligibility for exemptions under Regulations A, D, E, and Crowdfunding. The firms admitted to the violations and agreed to cease-and-desist orders without admitting or denying the allegations, and committed to retaining independent compliance consultants to review and reform their supervisory and recordkeeping policies. No monetary penalties were imposed, reflecting the SEC’s focus on remediation over punishment under its Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications Initiative. The waivers are strictly conditional, revocable if the firms breach their compliance commitments, and explicitly do not set a precedent for future cases. The SEC emphasized that the waivers apply only to disqualifications arising from these specific violations and do not affect other regulatory obligations or prior misconduct. This action underscores the Commission’s effort to encourage voluntary compliance and systemic reform in the wake of widespread off-channel communication failures.
Extracted insights
- person commission accept settlement offers
- Division Of Enforcement determined to recommend Commission accept settlement offers
- Commission issued separate orders instituting administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against Firms
- Firms failed to keep prescribed business‑related records
- Firms admit to facts set forth in their Record‑Keeping Orders
- Record‑Keeping Orders will require Dual‑Registered Entities and Broker‑Dealers to cease and desist from violations
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 11270 / February 9, 2024
In the Matter of
Certain
Broker-Dealer
Practices,
Respondents.
ORDER UNDER RULES 262(b)(2),
506(d)(2)(ii), AND 602(e) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND RULE
503(b)(2) OF REGULATION
CROWDFUNDING GRANTING
WAIVERS OF THE DISQUALIFICATION
PROVISIONS OF RULES 262(a)(4)(ii),
506(d)(1)(iv)(B), AND 602(c)(3) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND RULE
503(a)(4)(ii) OF REGULATION
CROWDFUNDING
I.
Pursuant to the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications Initiative,
1
the Division of
Enforcement determined to recommend that the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“Commission”) accept settlement offers from eight SEC registered broker-dealers (“Broker-
Dealers”), four SEC registered investment advisers (“Investment Advisers”), and four dual-
registered broker-dealer and investment advisers ( “Dual-Registered Entities”) (together, the
“Firms”) that committed certain non-scienter based record-keeping violations of the federal
securities laws and agreed to consent to certain standardized settlement terms.
II.
The Commission has issued separate orders (“Record-Keeping Orders”) instituting
administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against the Firms.
2
These proceedings are
1
The Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications Initiative is an investigative initiative conducted by the Division
of Enforcement.
2
The 16 Firms subject to this Order are named in the Appendix to this Order. Cambridge Investment Research,
Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Huntington Securities, Inc., Capstone Capital Markets LLC, and Guggenheim
Securities LLC are Commission-registered broker-dealers; Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc.,
Northwestern Mutual Investment Management Company, LLC, Mason Street Advisors, LLC, and Guggenheim
Partners Investment Management LLC are Commission-registered investment advisers; and Key Investment
Services LLC, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation, Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation, Northwestern
2
consistent with previously-accepted settlement terms and are brought pursuant to Sections 15(b)
and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Sections 203(e) and
203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) for willful violations of Section
17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) thereunder by the Dual-Registered Entities and
Broker-Dealers and for willful violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-
2(a)(7) thereunder by the Dual-Registered Entities and Investment Advisers for their failure to
comply with the recordkeeping requirements on broker-dealers and investment advisers to ensure
that they responsibly discharge their crucial roles in our markets. Specifically, the Firms failed
to keep for prescribed periods, and furnish copies of, such business–related records as necessary
or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. The Firms admit to facts
set forth in their respective Record-Keeping Orders and acknowledge that their conduct violated
the federal securities laws. The Record-Keeping Orders will require the Dual-Registered Entities
and Broker-Dealers to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future
violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-4 thereunder, require the Dual-
Registered Entities and Investment Advisers to cease and desist from committing or causing any
violations and any future violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2
thereunder, and require the Firms to, among other things, undertake to retain a compliance
consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of their supervisory, compliance, and other
policies and procedures designed to ensure that all relevant electronic communications are
preserved in accordance with the requirements of the federal securities laws. The Record-
Keeping Orders will trigger certain disqualifications from exemptions from registration available
under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) for the Firms.
III.
Rule 262(a) of Regulation A provides for disqualification from the Regulation A
exemption from registration under the Securities Act for offerings if, among other things, the
relevant entity is subject to a Commission order pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act
that places limitations on that entity’s activities, functions, or operations. See 17 CFR §
230.262(a)(4)(ii). Similarly, Rules 506(d) of Regulation D and 503(a) of Regulation
Crowdfunding provide for disqualification from the Regulation D and Regulation Crowdfunding
exemptions from registration under the Securities Act for certain offerings if, among other
things, the relevant entity is subject to a Commission order pursuant to Section 15(b) of the
Exchange Act that places limitations on that entity’s activities, functions, or operations. See 17
CFR §§ 230.506(d)(1)(iv)(B) and 227.503(a)(4)(ii).
Rule 602(a) of Regulation E provides an exemption from registration under the Securities
Act, subject to certain conditions, for securities issued by certain small business investment
companies and business development companies. See 17 CFR § 230.602(a). Rule 602(c)(3) of
Regulation E makes this exemption unavailable for the securities of an issuer if, among other
things, any investment adviser or any underwriter of the securities to be offered is subject to an
Mutual Investment Services, LLC, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc., Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., and The Huntington
Investment Company are dual-registered broker-dealers and investment advisers. While dual-registered entities,
Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc., and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. are
treated as Broker-Dealers for purposes of this Order.
3
order of the Commission entered pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act. See 17 CFR §
230.602(c)(3).
The Commission has the authority to waive the disqualifications of Regulations A , D, E,
and Crowdfunding upon a showing of good cause and without prejudice to any other action by
the Commission, if the Commission determines that it is not necessary under the circumstances
that an exemption be denied. See 17 CFR. §§ 230.262(b)(2), 230.506(d)(2)(ii), 230.602(e), and
227.503(b)(2).
In light of the Firms’ participation in the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications
Initiative, assuming the Firms comply with the terms of the Record-Keeping Orders, and in light
of the benefits of the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications Initiative, t he Commission
has determined that, pursuant to Rules 262(b)(2), 506(d)(2)(ii), and 602(e) of the Securities Act
and Rule 503(b)(2) of Regulation Crowdfunding, good cause exists for not denying the various
exemptions from registration discussed herein.
IV.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rules 262(b)(2), 506(d)(2)(ii), and 602(e) of
the Securities Act and Rule 503(b)(2) of Regulation Crowdfunding, that waivers from the
application of the disqualification provisions of Rules 262(a)(4)(ii), 506(d)(1)(iv)(B), and
602(c)(3) of the Securities Act and Rule 503(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation Crowdfunding, resulting
from the entry of the Record-Keeping Orders against the Firms are hereby granted to the Firms
as reflected in the attached appendix. Nothing in this Order shall affect any pre-existing
disqualification under the above provisions and nothing in this Order shall be interpreted to
waive or limit any conditions or undertakings which are in place as a result of any prior waiver
granted to any Firm. Failure to comply with terms of a Record-Keeping Order would require us
to revisit our determination that good cause has been shown and could constitute grounds to
revoke or further condition the waiver. The Commission reserves the right, in its sole discretion,
to revoke or further condition the waiver under these circumstances.
Because of the unique nature of the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications
Initiative, this Order and the circumstances under which it was issued shall not be relied upon by
any entity that may seek a waiver in the future from the disqualifications discussed herein.
By the Commission.
Vanessa Countryman
Secretary
Appendix: Firms
4
Appendix
(Waivers from disqualification under Regulations A, D, E, and Crowdfunding)
Cambridge Investment Research, Inc.
Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc.
Capstone Capital Markets LLC
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management LLC
Guggenheim Securities LLC
Huntington Securities, Inc.
Key Investment Services LLC
KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc.
Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation
Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation
Mason Street Advisors, LLC
Northwestern Mutual Investment Management Company, LLC
Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
The Huntington Investment Company
U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 11270 / February 9, 2024
In the Matter of
Certain
Broker-Dealer
Practices,
Respondents.
ORDER UNDER RULES 262(b)(2),
506(d)(2)(ii), AND 602(e) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND RULE
503(b)(2) OF REGULATION
CROWDFUNDING GRANTING
WAIVERS OF THE DISQUALIFICATION
PROVISIONS OF RULES 262(a)(4)(ii),
506(d)(1)(iv)(B), AND 602(c)(3) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND RULE
503(a)(4)(ii) OF REGULATION
CROWDFUNDING
I.
Pursuant to the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications Initiative,1 the Division of
Enforcement determined to recommend that the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“Commission”) accept settlement offers from eight SEC registered broker-dealers (“Broker-
Dealers”), four SEC registered investment advisers (“Investment Advisers”), and four dual-
registered broker-dealer and investment advisers (“Dual-Registered Entities”) (together, the
“Firms”) that committed certain non-scienter based record-keeping violations of the federal
securities laws and agreed to consent to certain standardized settlement terms.
II.
The Commission has issued separate orders (“Record-Keeping Orders”) instituting
administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against the Firms.2 These proceedings are
1 The Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications Initiative is an investigative initiative conducted by the Division
of Enforcement.
2 The 16 Firms subject to this Order are named in the Appendix to this Order. Cambridge Investment Research,
Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Huntington Securities, Inc., Capstone Capital Markets LLC, and Guggenheim
Securities LLC are Commission-registered broker-dealers; Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc.,
Northwestern Mutual Investment Management Company, LLC, Mason Street Advisors, LLC, and Guggenheim
Partners Investment Management LLC are Commission-registered investment advisers; and Key Investment
Services LLC, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation, Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation, Northwestern
2
consistent with previously-accepted settlement terms and are brought pursuant to Sections 15(b)
and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Sections 203(e) and
203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) for willful violations of Section
17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) thereunder by the Dual-Registered Entities and
Broker-Dealers and for willful violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-
2(a)(7) thereunder by the Dual-Registered Entities and Investment Advisers for their failure to
comply with the recordkeeping requirements on broker-dealers and investment advisers to ensure
that they responsibly discharge their crucial roles in our markets. Specifically, the Firms failed
to keep for prescribed periods, and furnish copies of, such business–related records as necessary
or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. The Firms admit to facts
set forth in their respective Record-Keeping Orders and acknowledge that their conduct violated
the federal securities laws. The Record-Keeping Orders will require the Dual-Registered Entities
and Broker-Dealers to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future
violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-4 thereunder, require the Dual-
Registered Entities and Investment Advisers to cease and desist from committing or causing any
violations and any future violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2
thereunder, and require the Firms to, among other things, undertake to retain a compliance
consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of their supervisory, compliance, and other
policies and procedures designed to ensure that all relevant electronic communications are
preserved in accordance with the requirements of the federal securities laws. The Record-
Keeping Orders will trigger certain disqualifications from exemptions from registration available
under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) for the Firms.
III.
Rule 262(a) of Regulation A provides for disqualification from the Regulation A
exemption from registration under the Securities Act for offerings if, among other things, the
relevant entity is subject to a Commission order pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act
that places limitations on that entity’s activities, functions, or operations. See 17 CFR §
230.262(a)(4)(ii). Similarly, Rules 506(d) of Regulation D and 503(a) of Regulation
Crowdfunding provide for disqualification from the Regulation D and Regulation Crowdfunding
exemptions from registration under the Securities Act for certain offerings if, among other
things, the relevant entity is subject to a Commission order pursuant to Section 15(b) of the
Exchange Act that places limitations on that entity’s activities, functions, or operations. See 17
CFR §§ 230.506(d)(1)(iv)(B) and 227.503(a)(4)(ii).
Rule 602(a) of Regulation E provides an exemption from registration under the Securities
Act, subject to certain conditions, for securities issued by certain small business investment
companies and business development companies. See 17 CFR § 230.602(a). Rule 602(c)(3) of
Regulation E makes this exemption unavailable for the securities of an issuer if, among other
things, any investment adviser or any underwriter of the securities to be offered is subject to an
Mutual Investment Services, LLC, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc., Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., and The Huntington
Investment Company are dual-registered broker-dealers and investment advisers. While dual-registered entities,
Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc., and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. are
treated as Broker-Dealers for purposes of this Order.
3
order of the Commission entered pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act. See 17 CFR §
230.602(c)(3).
The Commission has the authority to waive the disqualifications of Regulations A, D, E,
and Crowdfunding upon a showing of good cause and without prejudice to any other action by
the Commission, if the Commission determines that it is not necessary under the circumstances
that an exemption be denied. See 17 CFR. §§ 230.262(b)(2), 230.506(d)(2)(ii), 230.602(e), and
227.503(b)(2).
In light of the Firms’ participation in the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications
Initiative, assuming the Firms comply with the terms of the Record-Keeping Orders, and in light
of the benefits of the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications Initiative, the Commission
has determined that, pursuant to Rules 262(b)(2), 506(d)(2)(ii), and 602(e) of the Securities Act
and Rule 503(b)(2) of Regulation Crowdfunding, good cause exists for not denying the various
exemptions from registration discussed herein.
IV.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rules 262(b)(2), 506(d)(2)(ii), and 602(e) of
the Securities Act and Rule 503(b)(2) of Regulation Crowdfunding, that waivers from the
application of the disqualification provisions of Rules 262(a)(4)(ii), 506(d)(1)(iv)(B), and
602(c)(3) of the Securities Act and Rule 503(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation Crowdfunding, resulting
from the entry of the Record-Keeping Orders against the Firms are hereby granted to the Firms
as reflected in the attached appendix. Nothing in this Order shall affect any pre-existing
disqualification under the above provisions and nothing in this Order shall be interpreted to
waive or limit any conditions or undertakings which are in place as a result of any prior waiver
granted to any Firm. Failure to comply with terms of a Record-Keeping Order would require us
to revisit our determination that good cause has been shown and could constitute grounds to
revoke or further condition the waiver. The Commission reserves the right, in its sole discretion,
to revoke or further condition the waiver under these circumstances.
Because of the unique nature of the Broker-Dealer Off-Channel Communications
Initiative, this Order and the circumstances under which it was issued shall not be relied upon by
any entity that may seek a waiver in the future from the disqualifications discussed herein.
By the Commission.
Vanessa Countryman
Secretary
Appendix: Firms
4
Appendix
(Waivers from disqualification under Regulations A, D, E, and Crowdfunding)
Cambridge Investment Research, Inc.
Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc.
Capstone Capital Markets LLC
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management LLC
Guggenheim Securities LLC
Huntington Securities, Inc.
Key Investment Services LLC
KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc.
Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation
Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation
Mason Street Advisors, LLC
Northwestern Mutual Investment Management Company, LLC
Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
The Huntington Investment Company
U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.