2022-02-15 SEC Press pdf 163 KB 11,559 chars

In re HINSDALE ASSOCIATES

summary

Hinsdale Associates, Inc. violated SEC rules by failing to file and deliver its Form CRS to retail clients by June–July 2020 deadlines and not becoming compliant until July 2021, resulting in a cease-and-desist order, censure, and a $25,000 civil penalty after SEC warnings.

paragraph

Hinsdale Associates, Inc. (HAI), an SEC-registered investment adviser since 1983 with $124.9 million in assets and 187 clients, failed to file its Form CRS with the SEC or deliver it to retail clients by the June 30 and July 30, 2020 deadlines, as required under Advisers Act Sections 204 and Rules 204-1 and 204-5. Despite being alerted by the SEC’s Division of Examinations in December 2020 and again in May 2021, HAI did not comply until July 2021, also failing to post the Form CRS on its website until that time. Without admitting or denying the findings, HAI consented to a cease-and-desist order, a censure, and a $25,000 civil penalty payable in four $6,250 installments over 360 days, with interest on late payments and no offset rights in related investor actions.

narrative

Hinsdale Associates, Inc. (HAI), an Illinois-based investment adviser registered with the SEC since 1983, violated Sections 204 and Rules 204-1 and 204-5 of the Investment Advisers Act by failing to file its Form CRS with the Commission and deliver it to retail clients by the June 30 and July 30, 2020 deadlines. HAI managed approximately $124.9 million in assets and served 187 individual clients, all of whom were entitled to receive the Form CRS under SEC rules designed to enhance transparency for retail investors. Despite being contacted by the SEC’s Division of Examinations in December 2020 and again in May 2021, HAI did not take corrective action until July 2021, when it finally filed the Form CRS and delivered it to clients, and posted it on its website. The firm’s delay constituted a willful failure to comply with regulatory obligations, prompting the SEC to institute administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings. Without admitting or denying the findings, HAI consented to a cease-and-desist order, a formal censure, and a $25,000 civil penalty payable in four equal installments of $6,250 over 360 days, with interest accruing on overdue amounts. The SEC also required HAI to waive any right to offset or reduce compensatory damages in related investor actions based on the penalty paid, reinforcing the importance of timely compliance with Form CRS requirements.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
investment-adviser-fraud (90%)
Outcome
settled
Civil penalty
$25,000
Victim loss
$124,910,323
Classified investment-adviser-fraud(confidence 90%). EDGAR detection: forms ADV/ADV-E/ADV-W/Form D· recall 33% / precision 13%. detection rule →
Statutes
31 U.S.C. § 3717SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACTSECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACTRule 204-1(e)Rule 204-5Rule 204-5(b)Rule 204-5(d)Rule 204-5(e)
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionHINSDALE ASSOCIATES, INC.
Keywords
formcrscommissionretail investorrespondentretailadvisersorderhaiinvestorsecurities exchangeinvestmentexchange commissioninvestment advisersinvestor clients

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 4
  • $124.91M $124,910,323 $100M–$1B
  • $25K $25,000 $10K–$100K
  • $6K $6,250 <$10K
  • $6K $6,250 <$10K
Entities 6
  • person deliver form crs
  • person file form crs
  • person form crs
  • company hinsdale associates, inc.
  • company proceedings against hinsdale associates, inc.
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 10
  • Securities and Exchange Commission instituted proceedings against Hinsdale Associates, Inc.
  • Hinsdale Associates, Inc. consented to entry of Order
  • Hinsdale Associates, Inc. failed to file Form CRS
  • Hinsdale Associates, Inc. failed to deliver Form CRS
  • Hinsdale Associates, Inc. violated Advisers Act Section 204
  • Hinsdale Associates, Inc. violated Rules 204-1 and 204-5
  • Hinsdale Associates, Inc. reported $124,910,323 in regulatory assets under management
  • Hinsdale Associates, Inc. reported 187 individual clients
  • Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Form CRS
  • Securities and Exchange Commission determined to accept Offer of Settlement
Text layers
Extracted body text (11,559c)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 Before the 
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
 
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 
Release No. 5966 / February 15, 2022 
 
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 
File No. 3-20767 
 
 
In the Matter of 
 
HINSDALE ASSOCIATES, 
INC.  
 
Respondent. 
 
ORDER INSTITUTING 
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 
SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF THE 
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, 
MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING 
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER  
   
 
I. 
 
 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the 
public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, 
instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 
(“Advisers Act”) against Hinsdale Associates, Inc. (“HAI” or “Respondent”).   
 
II. 
 
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the 
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the 
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings  
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these 
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting 
Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the 
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a 
Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.   
 
III. 
  
 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:  
 
 
 
 

 
2 
 
Summary 
 
1. This matter involves HAI’s failure to file with the Commission and to deliver to 
retail investor clients its Form CRS.  HAI was required to file its initial Form CRS with the 
Commission as Part 3 of its Form ADV and to begin delivering its Form CRS to prospective and 
new retail investor clients, as applicable, by June 30, 2020.  HAI was further required to deliver its 
Form CRS to existing retail investor clients by July 30, 2020.  The firm failed to file and deliver 
Form CRS by these deadlines, not becoming compliant until in or after July 2021.  As a result, 
HAI violated Advisers Act Section 204 and Rules 204-1 and 204-5 thereunder. 
 
Respondent 
 
2. HAI is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Hinsdale, 
Illinois.  HAI has been registered with the Commission as an investment adviser since May 1983.  
On its Form ADV dated July 9, 2021, HAI reported that it had approximately $124,910,323 in 
regulatory assets under management and 187 individual clients.   
 
Facts 
 
3. On June 5, 2019, the Commission adopted Form CRS and rules creating new 
requirements—the Form CRS Filing Requirement and the Form CRS Delivery Requirement 
(collectively, the “Requirements”)—for Commission-registered investment advisers offering 
services to a retail investor.
1
  See Form CRS Relationship Summary; Amendments to Form ADV, 
Release Nos. 34-86032 & IA-5247 (June 5, 2019) (effective September 10, 2019) (“Form CRS 
Adopting Release”). 
 
4. The Form CRS Filing Requirement.  First, Rule 204-1(e) under the Advisers Act 
requires all Commission-registered investment advisers offering services to a retail investor 
(“Retail RIAs”) to amend their Form ADV by electronically filing on the Investment Adviser 
Registration Database (“IARD”) an initial Form CRS satisfying the requirements of Part 3 of Form 
ADV no later than June 30, 2020. 
 
5. The Form CRS Delivery Requirement.  Second, Rule 204-5 under the Advisers Act 
requires Retail RIAs to deliver their current Form CRS to each retail investor client.  Specifically, 
under Rule 204-5(b) under the Advisers Act, the Retail RIA must deliver: (1) to each retail investor 
client its current Form CRS before or at the time the firm enters into an investment advisory 
contract with that client; and (2) to each retail investor client who is an existing client the Retail 
RIA’s current Form CRS before or at the time the firm: 
 opens a new account that is different from the retail investor client’s 
existing account(s); 
                                                 
1
 For purposes of Form CRS, the term “retail investor” means “a natural person, or the legal 
representative of such natural person, who seeks to receive or receives services primarily for 
personal, family or household purposes.”  Rule 204-5(d)(2) under the Advisers Act. 

 
3 
 recommends that the retail investor client roll over assets from a retirement 
account into a new or existing account or investment; or 
 recommends or provides a new investment advisory service or investment 
that does not necessarily involve the opening of a new account and would 
not be held in an existing account. 
See Rule 204-5(b)(1) & (b)(2).  Rule 204-5(b)(3) also requires Retail RIAs to post their current 
Form CRS prominently on their website, if they have one, in a location and format that is easily 
accessible to retail investors.  The deadline for Retail RIAs to begin complying with the Form CRS 
Delivery Requirement was June 30, 2020 for prospective and new retail investor clients and July 
30, 2020 for the initial delivery to existing retail investor clients.  See Rule 204-5(e)(1) & (e)(2); 
Form CRS Adopting Release at 239, 242, 406-407; Form ADV, Part 3: Instructions to Form CRS, 
General Instruction 7.C (Sept. 2019). 
 
6. HAI failed to comply with the Requirements by its regulatory deadlines, and began 
complying only after the Division of Examinations (“EXAMS”) contacted the firm regarding the 
failure to file its Form CRS.  Specifically, EXAMS contacted HAI’s President and Chief 
Compliance Officer by email on December 17, 2020 to alert him that the firm had failed to file 
Form CRS.  HAI, however, still did not file its Form CRS.  On May 25, 2021, EXAMS again 
contacted HAI but this time to announce an examination relating to, among other things, the 
firm’s failure to file Form CRS.  HAI finally filed Form CRS with the Commission on July 9, 
2021, and the firm did not deliver Form CRS to its existing retail investor clients until July 8, 
2021.  In addition, HAI failed to post Form CRS on its website until July 7, 2021.   
 
Violations 
 
7. As a result of the conduct described above, HAI willfully
2
 violated Section 204 of 
the Advisers Act and Rules 204-1 and 204-5 thereunder. 
 
IV. 
 In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to 
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent HAI’s Offer. 
 
                                                 
2
 “Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 203(e) of the Advisers Act “‘means no 
more than that the person charged with the duty knows what he is doing.’”  Wonsover v. SEC, 205 
F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 
1949)).  There is no requirement that the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules 
or Acts.”  Tager v. SEC, 344 F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965).  The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. 
SEC, which construed the term “willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory 
provision, does not alter that standard.  922 F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the 
showing required to establish that a person has “willfully omit[ted]” material information from a 
required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the Advisers Act). 

 
4 
 Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act, it is hereby 
ORDERED that: 
 
 A. Respondent cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any 
future violations of Advisers Act Section 204 and Rules 204-1 and 204-5 thereunder. 
 
B.  Respondent is censured. 
 
C.  Respondent shall pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $25,000 to the 
Securities and Exchange Commission for transfer to the general fund of the United States 
Treasury, subject to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 21F(g)(3).  Payment shall be made in 
the following installments: the first $6,250 within 90 days of the date of this Order, the second 
$6,250 within 180 days of the Order, the third $6,250 within 270 days of the Order, and the fourth 
$6,250, plus all accrued interest, within 360 days of the Order.  Payments shall be applied first to 
post-order interest, which accrues pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.  Prior to making the final payment 
set forth herein, Respondent shall contact the staff of the Commission for the amount due.  If 
Respondent fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to 
the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Order, including post-order 
interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the discretion of 
the staff of the Commission without further application to the Commission. 
 
Payment must be made in one of the following ways:   
 
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which 
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  
 
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov 
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  
 
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United 
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange 
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:  
 
Enterprise Services Center 
Accounts Receivable Branch 
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 
 
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying HAI 
as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy of the 
cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Assistant Director Anne C. McKinley, 
Division of Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 W. 
Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, IL 60604. 
 

 
5 
 D. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be 
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 
award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a 
Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting 
the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the 
Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be deemed 
an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty 
imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a 
private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors based 
on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this 
proceeding. 
 
 
 By the Commission. 
 
 
 
Vanessa A. Countryman 
       Secretary 
 
OCR text (11,802c · tika · 95% conf)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 Before the 

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

 

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 

Release No. 5966 / February 15, 2022 

 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-20767 

 

 

In the Matter of 

 

HINSDALE ASSOCIATES, 

INC.  

 

Respondent. 

 

ORDER INSTITUTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-

DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 

SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF THE 

INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, 

MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING 

REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-

AND-DESIST ORDER  

   

 

I. 
 

 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the 

public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, 

instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 

(“Advisers Act”) against Hinsdale Associates, Inc. (“HAI” or “Respondent”).   

 

II. 
 

In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 

of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the 

purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the 

Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings  

herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these 

proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting 

Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the 

Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a 

Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.   

 

III. 
  

 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:  

 

 

 

 



 

2 

 

Summary 
 

1. This matter involves HAI’s failure to file with the Commission and to deliver to 

retail investor clients its Form CRS.  HAI was required to file its initial Form CRS with the 

Commission as Part 3 of its Form ADV and to begin delivering its Form CRS to prospective and 

new retail investor clients, as applicable, by June 30, 2020.  HAI was further required to deliver its 

Form CRS to existing retail investor clients by July 30, 2020.  The firm failed to file and deliver 

Form CRS by these deadlines, not becoming compliant until in or after July 2021.  As a result, 

HAI violated Advisers Act Section 204 and Rules 204-1 and 204-5 thereunder. 

 

Respondent 

 

2. HAI is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Hinsdale, 

Illinois.  HAI has been registered with the Commission as an investment adviser since May 1983.  

On its Form ADV dated July 9, 2021, HAI reported that it had approximately $124,910,323 in 

regulatory assets under management and 187 individual clients.   

 

Facts 

 

3. On June 5, 2019, the Commission adopted Form CRS and rules creating new 

requirements—the Form CRS Filing Requirement and the Form CRS Delivery Requirement 

(collectively, the “Requirements”)—for Commission-registered investment advisers offering 

services to a retail investor.1  See Form CRS Relationship Summary; Amendments to Form ADV, 

Release Nos. 34-86032 & IA-5247 (June 5, 2019) (effective September 10, 2019) (“Form CRS 

Adopting Release”). 

 

4. The Form CRS Filing Requirement.  First, Rule 204-1(e) under the Advisers Act 

requires all Commission-registered investment advisers offering services to a retail investor 

(“Retail RIAs”) to amend their Form ADV by electronically filing on the Investment Adviser 

Registration Database (“IARD”) an initial Form CRS satisfying the requirements of Part 3 of Form 

ADV no later than June 30, 2020. 

 

5. The Form CRS Delivery Requirement.  Second, Rule 204-5 under the Advisers Act 

requires Retail RIAs to deliver their current Form CRS to each retail investor client.  Specifically, 

under Rule 204-5(b) under the Advisers Act, the Retail RIA must deliver: (1) to each retail investor 

client its current Form CRS before or at the time the firm enters into an investment advisory 

contract with that client; and (2) to each retail investor client who is an existing client the Retail 

RIA’s current Form CRS before or at the time the firm: 

 opens a new account that is different from the retail investor client’s 

existing account(s); 

                                                 
1 For purposes of Form CRS, the term “retail investor” means “a natural person, or the legal 

representative of such natural person, who seeks to receive or receives services primarily for 

personal, family or household purposes.”  Rule 204-5(d)(2) under the Advisers Act. 



 

3 

 recommends that the retail investor client roll over assets from a retirement 

account into a new or existing account or investment; or 

 recommends or provides a new investment advisory service or investment 

that does not necessarily involve the opening of a new account and would 

not be held in an existing account. 

See Rule 204-5(b)(1) & (b)(2).  Rule 204-5(b)(3) also requires Retail RIAs to post their current 

Form CRS prominently on their website, if they have one, in a location and format that is easily 

accessible to retail investors.  The deadline for Retail RIAs to begin complying with the Form CRS 

Delivery Requirement was June 30, 2020 for prospective and new retail investor clients and July 

30, 2020 for the initial delivery to existing retail investor clients.  See Rule 204-5(e)(1) & (e)(2); 

Form CRS Adopting Release at 239, 242, 406-407; Form ADV, Part 3: Instructions to Form CRS, 

General Instruction 7.C (Sept. 2019). 

 

6. HAI failed to comply with the Requirements by its regulatory deadlines, and began 

complying only after the Division of Examinations (“EXAMS”) contacted the firm regarding the 

failure to file its Form CRS.  Specifically, EXAMS contacted HAI’s President and Chief 

Compliance Officer by email on December 17, 2020 to alert him that the firm had failed to file 

Form CRS.  HAI, however, still did not file its Form CRS.  On May 25, 2021, EXAMS again 

contacted HAI but this time to announce an examination relating to, among other things, the 

firm’s failure to file Form CRS.  HAI finally filed Form CRS with the Commission on July 9, 

2021, and the firm did not deliver Form CRS to its existing retail investor clients until July 8, 

2021.  In addition, HAI failed to post Form CRS on its website until July 7, 2021.   

 

Violations 

 

7. As a result of the conduct described above, HAI willfully2 violated Section 204 of 

the Advisers Act and Rules 204-1 and 204-5 thereunder. 

 

IV. 

 In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to 

impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent HAI’s Offer. 

 

                                                 
2 “Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 203(e) of the Advisers Act “‘means no 

more than that the person charged with the duty knows what he is doing.’”  Wonsover v. SEC, 205 

F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 

1949)).  There is no requirement that the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules 

or Acts.”  Tager v. SEC, 344 F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965).  The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. 

SEC, which construed the term “willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory 

provision, does not alter that standard.  922 F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the 

showing required to establish that a person has “willfully omit[ted]” material information from a 

required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the Advisers Act). 



 

4 

 Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act, it is hereby 

ORDERED that: 

 

 A. Respondent cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any 

future violations of Advisers Act Section 204 and Rules 204-1 and 204-5 thereunder. 

 

B.  Respondent is censured. 

 

C.  Respondent shall pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $25,000 to the 

Securities and Exchange Commission for transfer to the general fund of the United States 

Treasury, subject to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 21F(g)(3).  Payment shall be made in 

the following installments: the first $6,250 within 90 days of the date of this Order, the second 

$6,250 within 180 days of the Order, the third $6,250 within 270 days of the Order, and the fourth 

$6,250, plus all accrued interest, within 360 days of the Order.  Payments shall be applied first to 

post-order interest, which accrues pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.  Prior to making the final payment 

set forth herein, Respondent shall contact the staff of the Commission for the amount due.  If 

Respondent fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to 

the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Order, including post-order 

interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the discretion of 

the staff of the Commission without further application to the Commission. 

 

Payment must be made in one of the following ways:   

 

(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which 

will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  

 

(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov 

through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  

 

(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United 

States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:  

 

Enterprise Services Center 

Accounts Receivable Branch 

HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

 

Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying HAI 

as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy of the 

cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Assistant Director Anne C. McKinley, 

Division of Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 W. 

Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, IL 60604. 

 

http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm


 

5 

 D. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be 

treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 

preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 

Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 

award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 

penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a 

Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting 

the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the 

Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be deemed 

an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty 

imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a 

private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors based 

on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this 

proceeding. 

 

 

 By the Commission. 

 

 

 

Vanessa A. Countryman 

       Secretary