In re FFL PARTNERS
FFL Partners, LLC violated the SEC’s pay-to-play rule by continuing to receive advisory fees from a Wisconsin state pension fund within two years of a $10,000 campaign contribution made by a covered associate to a gubernatorial candidate who appointed trustees with influence over adviser selection, resulting in a cease-and-desist order, censure, and $75,000 penalty.
FFL Partners, LLC, a registered investment adviser, violated Rule 206(4)-5 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 when a covered associate made a $10,000 campaign contribution to a Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate in March 2012, who had authority to appoint trustees overseeing the state’s public pension fund. Within two years of that contribution, FFL continued to provide advisory services for compensation to the pension fund’s $50 million investment in its private equity fund, triggering the rule’s mandatory two-year prohibition. The SEC found the violation regardless of intent, and FFL consented to a cease-and-desist order, censure, and a $75,000 civil penalty without admitting or denying the allegations.
FFL Partners, LLC, a San Francisco-based investment adviser registered with the SEC, violated the SEC’s pay-to-play rule (Rule 206(4)-5) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by continuing to receive advisory fees from the Wisconsin Core Retirement Investment Trust within two years of a campaign contribution made by a covered associate. In March 2012, the covered associate contributed $10,000 to a candidate for Governor of Wisconsin, an office with authority to appoint members of the pension fund’s board of trustees, who influence the selection of investment advisers. Despite this contribution, FFL maintained its advisory relationship with the pension fund, which had committed $50 million to FFL’s private equity fund as early as 2008 and remained invested throughout the relevant period. Rule 206(4)-5 prohibits such advisory services for two years after a covered associate’s contribution to an official who can influence government client selection, regardless of any quid pro quo. The SEC found FFL’s conduct a willful violation of Section 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-5, and FFL consented to a cease-and-desist order, formal censure, and a $75,000 civil penalty without admitting or denying the findings. FFL also agreed not to seek a penalty offset in any related investor litigation, and the settlement was accepted by the Commission in January 2017.
Extracted insights
- $3.98B $3.982 billion ≥$1B
- $50.00M $50 million $10M–$100M
- $75K $75,000 $10K–$100K
- $10K $10,000 $10K–$100K
- $350 $350 <$10K
- $150 $150 <$10K
- person administrative proceeding
- company covered associate of ffl partners, llc
- company ffl partners, llc
- company friedman fleischer & lowe, llc
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- FFL Partners, LLC violated Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-5
- FFL Partners, LLC is located in San Francisco, California
- FFL Partners, LLC changed name from Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, LLC
- FFL Partners, LLC registered with SEC as investment adviser since March 2012
- Covered Associate of FFL Partners, LLC made campaign contribution in 2012 to candidate for elected office in Wisconsin
- FFL Partners, LLC provided advisory services for compensation to Wisconsin state public pension fund within two years of contribution
- SEC instituted proceedings against FFL Partners, LLC pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of Investment Advisers Act
- Administrative Proceeding issued on January 17, 2017
- Rule 206(4)-5 prohibits investment advisers from providing services for compensation to government client for two years after covered associate makes campaign contribution
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 4610 / January 17, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-17781
In the Matter of
FFL PARTNERS, LLC
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE AND
CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF
THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940,
MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-AND-
DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in
the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) against FFL Partners, LLC (“FFL” or “Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the
findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a
Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that:
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not
binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
A. SUMMARY
1. These proceedings involve violations of the Commission’s “pay-to-play” rule for
investment advisers by Respondent FFL, an investment adviser to private equity funds that
primarily invest in U.S. middle market companies. Rule 206(4)-5, promulgated under Section
206(4) of the Advisers Act, is a prophylactic rule designed to address pay-to-play abuses
involving campaign contributions made by certain investment advisers or their covered
associates to government officials who are in a position to influence the selection of investment
advisers to manage government client assets, including public pension fund assets. Among other
things, Rule 206(4)-5 prohibits certain investment advisers from providing investment advisory
services for compensation to a government client (or to an investment vehicle in which a
government entity invests) for two years after the adviser or certain of its executives or
employees (known as covered associates) makes a campaign contribution to certain elected
officials or candidates who can influence the selection of certain investment advisers.
2. In 2012, a covered associate of Respondent made a campaign contribution to a
candidate for elected office in the state of Wisconsin, which office had the authority to appoint
persons who had influence over selecting investment advisers for the Wisconsin state public
pension funds. Within two years of this contribution, Respondent provided advisory services for
compensation to one of these public pension funds. By providing those advisory services for
compensation, Respondent violated Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-5
thereunder.
B. RESPONDENT
3. FFL Partners, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company located in San
Francisco, California. In July 2016, FFL changed its name from “Friedman Fleischer & Lowe,
LLC.” FFL has been registered with the Commission as an investment adviser since March 2012.
In its Form ADV filed with the Commission on July 29, 2016, FFL reported regulatory assets under
management of approximately $3.982 billion.
C. BACKGROUND
4. In 2008, a Wisconsin state public pension plan, the Core Retirement Investment
Trust (the “Wisconsin pension plan”), committed to invest approximately $50 million in Friedman
Fleischer & Lowe Capital Partners III, L.P. (the “Fund”), a private equity fund advised by
Respondent. Upon making its commitment as a limited partner, the Wisconsin pension plan was
contractually committed to invest approximately $50 million in the Fund, and the Wisconsin
pension plan subsequently made this investment over time. During the relevant times, the
Wisconsin pension plan remained invested in the Fund. The Fund was a closed-end fund and
investors were generally prohibited from withdrawing their money for the life of the fund.
3
5. In March 2012, a covered associate
2
of Respondent (the “Covered Associate”) made
a campaign contribution totaling $10,000 to a candidate for the office of the Governor of
Wisconsin.
3
6. The office of the Governor of Wisconsin had the ability to influence the selection
of investment advisers for the Wisconsin pension plan. Specifically, the Governor of Wisconsin
appoints several members of the board of trustees of the investment board managing the
Wisconsin pension plan. The trustees have influence over investments by the pension plan and
the selection of investment advisers and pooled investment vehicles for the pension plan.
7. During the two years after the contribution, Respondent continued to provide
investment advisory services for compensation to the Fund.
8. Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(a)(1) prohibits any investment adviser registered with
the Commission, investment adviser required to be registered with the Commission, foreign
private adviser, or exempt reporting adviser from providing investment advisory services for
compensation to a government entity
4
within two years after a contribution to an official
5
of a
government entity made by the investment adviser or any covered associate of the investment
adviser. Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5 also applies to investment advisers, including exempt
reporting advisers, to a covered investment pool in which a government entity invests or is
solicited to invest as though the adviser were providing or seeking to provide investment
2
Covered associates are defined to include: (i) any general partner, managing member or executive
officer, or other individual with a similar status or function; (ii) any employee who solicits a government
entity for the investment adviser and any person who supervises, directly or indirectly, such employee; and
(iii) any political action committee controlled by the investment adviser or by any of its covered associates.
See Rule 206(4)-5(f)(2).
3
Rule 206(4)-5 has a de minimis exception, which permits covered associates to make aggregate
contributions without triggering the two-year time out of up to $350, per election, to an elected official or
candidate for whom the covered associate is entitled to vote,
and up to $150, per election, to an elected
official or candidate for whom the covered associate is not entitled to vote. See Rule 206(4)-5(b)(1).
4
See Rule 206(4)-5(f)(5).
5
“Official” includes any person who, at the time of the relevant contribution, was an incumbent,
candidate or successful candidate for elective office of a government entity if the office is directly or
indirectly responsible for, or can influence the outcome of, the hiring of an investment adviser by a
government entity or has authority to appoint any person who is directly or indirectly responsible for, or can
influence the outcome of, the hiring of an investment adviser by a government entity. See Rule 206(4)-
5(f)(6).
4
advisory services directly to the government entity.
6
Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5 does not require
a showing of quid pro quo or actual intent to influence an elected official or candidate.
9. As a public pension plan, the Wisconsin pension plan was a government entity as
defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(5). The contributor was a covered associate of
Respondent as defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(2). The candidate who received the
contribution was an official as defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(6) of a government
entity because the office that the candidate was seeking to become associated with had authority
to influence the hiring of investment advisers by the government entity. The Fund was a covered
investment pool as defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(3) because it would be an
investment company under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act but for the exclusion
from the definition of investment company provided by Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment
Company Act.
10. Under Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5, the contribution triggered a two-year “time-out”
on Respondent providing advisory services to the Wisconsin pension plan for compensation.
During the two years after the contribution, Respondent continued to provide advisory services for
compensation to the Fund and, therefore, received advisory fees attributable to the investments of
the Wisconsin pension plan in the Fund.
D. VIOLATIONS
11. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent FFL willfully
7
violated
Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-5 thereunder, which makes it unlawful for
any investment adviser registered (or required to be registered) with the Commission, or
unregistered in reliance on the exemption available under Section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act,
or that is an exempt reporting adviser, to provide investment advisory services for compensation
6
See Rule 206(4)-5(c). A “covered investment pool” is defined as (i) an investment company
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) that is an investment
option of a plan or program of a government entity; or (ii) any company that would be an investment
company under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act, but for the exclusion provided from that
definition by either Section 3(c)(1), Section 3(c)(7) or Section 3(c)(11) of that Act. See Rule 206(4)-
5(f)(3). Rule 206(4)-5 applies to investment advisers even if the government entity was already invested in
the covered investment pool at the time of the contribution.
7
A willful violation of the securities laws means merely “‘that the person charged with the duty
knows what he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v.
SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that the actor “‘also be aware that he
is violating one of the Rules or Acts.’” Id. (quoting Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 798, 803
(D.C. Cir. 1965)).
5
to a government entity within two years after a contribution to an official of the government
entity is made by the investment adviser or any covered associate of the investment adviser.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent FFL’s Offer.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
A. Respondent FFL Partners, LLC shall cease and desist from committing or causing
any violations and any future violations of Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-5
thereunder.
B. Respondent FFL Partners, LLC is censured.
C. Respondent FFL Partners, LLC shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order,
pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $75,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission
for transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section
21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
§3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
6
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying FFL
Partners, LLC as the Respondent in these proceedings, the file number of these proceedings; a
copy of which cover letter and check or money order must be sent to LeeAnn Ghazil Gaunt,
Chief, Public Finance Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, Boston Regional
Office, 33 Arch Street, 23
rd
Floor, Boston, MA 02110.
D. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall
be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any
award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a
Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting
the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the
Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed
an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty
imposed in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a
private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors
based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this
proceeding.
By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields
Secretary UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 4610 / January 17, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-17781
In the Matter of
FFL PARTNERS, LLC
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE AND
CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF
THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940,
MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-AND-
DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in
the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) against FFL Partners, LLC (“FFL” or “Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the
findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a
Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that:
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not
binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
A. SUMMARY
1. These proceedings involve violations of the Commission’s “pay-to-play” rule for
investment advisers by Respondent FFL, an investment adviser to private equity funds that
primarily invest in U.S. middle market companies. Rule 206(4)-5, promulgated under Section
206(4) of the Advisers Act, is a prophylactic rule designed to address pay-to-play abuses
involving campaign contributions made by certain investment advisers or their covered
associates to government officials who are in a position to influence the selection of investment
advisers to manage government client assets, including public pension fund assets. Among other
things, Rule 206(4)-5 prohibits certain investment advisers from providing investment advisory
services for compensation to a government client (or to an investment vehicle in which a
government entity invests) for two years after the adviser or certain of its executives or
employees (known as covered associates) makes a campaign contribution to certain elected
officials or candidates who can influence the selection of certain investment advisers.
2. In 2012, a covered associate of Respondent made a campaign contribution to a
candidate for elected office in the state of Wisconsin, which office had the authority to appoint
persons who had influence over selecting investment advisers for the Wisconsin state public
pension funds. Within two years of this contribution, Respondent provided advisory services for
compensation to one of these public pension funds. By providing those advisory services for
compensation, Respondent violated Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-5
thereunder.
B. RESPONDENT
3. FFL Partners, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company located in San
Francisco, California. In July 2016, FFL changed its name from “Friedman Fleischer & Lowe,
LLC.” FFL has been registered with the Commission as an investment adviser since March 2012.
In its Form ADV filed with the Commission on July 29, 2016, FFL reported regulatory assets under
management of approximately $3.982 billion.
C. BACKGROUND
4. In 2008, a Wisconsin state public pension plan, the Core Retirement Investment
Trust (the “Wisconsin pension plan”), committed to invest approximately $50 million in Friedman
Fleischer & Lowe Capital Partners III, L.P. (the “Fund”), a private equity fund advised by
Respondent. Upon making its commitment as a limited partner, the Wisconsin pension plan was
contractually committed to invest approximately $50 million in the Fund, and the Wisconsin
pension plan subsequently made this investment over time. During the relevant times, the
Wisconsin pension plan remained invested in the Fund. The Fund was a closed-end fund and
investors were generally prohibited from withdrawing their money for the life of the fund.
3
5. In March 2012, a covered associate
2
of Respondent (the “Covered Associate”) made
a campaign contribution totaling $10,000 to a candidate for the office of the Governor of
Wisconsin.
3
6. The office of the Governor of Wisconsin had the ability to influence the selection
of investment advisers for the Wisconsin pension plan. Specifically, the Governor of Wisconsin
appoints several members of the board of trustees of the investment board managing the
Wisconsin pension plan. The trustees have influence over investments by the pension plan and
the selection of investment advisers and pooled investment vehicles for the pension plan.
7. During the two years after the contribution, Respondent continued to provide
investment advisory services for compensation to the Fund.
8. Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(a)(1) prohibits any investment adviser registered with
the Commission, investment adviser required to be registered with the Commission, foreign
private adviser, or exempt reporting adviser from providing investment advisory services for
compensation to a government entity
4
within two years after a contribution to an official
5
of a
government entity made by the investment adviser or any covered associate of the investment
adviser. Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5 also applies to investment advisers, including exempt
reporting advisers, to a covered investment pool in which a government entity invests or is
solicited to invest as though the adviser were providing or seeking to provide investment
2
Covered associates are defined to include: (i) any general partner, managing member or executive
officer, or other individual with a similar status or function; (ii) any employee who solicits a government
entity for the investment adviser and any person who supervises, directly or indirectly, such employee; and
(iii) any political action committee controlled by the investment adviser or by any of its covered associates.
See Rule 206(4)-5(f)(2).
3
Rule 206(4)-5 has a de minimis exception, which permits covered associates to make aggregate
contributions without triggering the two-year time out of up to $350, per election, to an elected official or
candidate for whom the covered associate is entitled to vote,
and up to $150, per election, to an elected
official or candidate for whom the covered associate is not entitled to vote. See Rule 206(4)-5(b)(1).
4
See Rule 206(4)-5(f)(5).
5
“Official” includes any person who, at the time of the relevant contribution, was an incumbent,
candidate or successful candidate for elective office of a government entity if the office is directly or
indirectly responsible for, or can influence the outcome of, the hiring of an investment adviser by a
government entity or has authority to appoint any person who is directly or indirectly responsible for, or can
influence the outcome of, the hiring of an investment adviser by a government entity. See Rule 206(4)-
5(f)(6).
4
advisory services directly to the government entity.
6
Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5 does not require
a showing of quid pro quo or actual intent to influence an elected official or candidate.
9. As a public pension plan, the Wisconsin pension plan was a government entity as
defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(5). The contributor was a covered associate of
Respondent as defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(2). The candidate who received the
contribution was an official as defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(6) of a government
entity because the office that the candidate was seeking to become associated with had authority
to influence the hiring of investment advisers by the government entity. The Fund was a covered
investment pool as defined in Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5(f)(3) because it would be an
investment company under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act but for the exclusion
from the definition of investment company provided by Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment
Company Act.
10. Under Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5, the contribution triggered a two-year “time-out”
on Respondent providing advisory services to the Wisconsin pension plan for compensation.
During the two years after the contribution, Respondent continued to provide advisory services for
compensation to the Fund and, therefore, received advisory fees attributable to the investments of
the Wisconsin pension plan in the Fund.
D. VIOLATIONS
11. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent FFL willfully
7
violated
Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-5 thereunder, which makes it unlawful for
any investment adviser registered (or required to be registered) with the Commission, or
unregistered in reliance on the exemption available under Section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act,
or that is an exempt reporting adviser, to provide investment advisory services for compensation
6
See Rule 206(4)-5(c). A “covered investment pool” is defined as (i) an investment company
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) that is an investment
option of a plan or program of a government entity; or (ii) any company that would be an investment
company under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act, but for the exclusion provided from that
definition by either Section 3(c)(1), Section 3(c)(7) or Section 3(c)(11) of that Act. See Rule 206(4)-
5(f)(3). Rule 206(4)-5 applies to investment advisers even if the government entity was already invested in
the covered investment pool at the time of the contribution.
7
A willful violation of the securities laws means merely “‘that the person charged with the duty
knows what he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v.
SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that the actor “‘also be aware that he
is violating one of the Rules or Acts.’” Id. (quoting Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 798, 803
(D.C. Cir. 1965)).
5
to a government entity within two years after a contribution to an official of the government
entity is made by the investment adviser or any covered associate of the investment adviser.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent FFL’s Offer.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
A. Respondent FFL Partners, LLC shall cease and desist from committing or causing
any violations and any future violations of Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-5
thereunder.
B. Respondent FFL Partners, LLC is censured.
C. Respondent FFL Partners, LLC shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order,
pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $75,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission
for transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section
21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
§3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
6
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying FFL
Partners, LLC as the Respondent in these proceedings, the file number of these proceedings; a
copy of which cover letter and check or money order must be sent to LeeAnn Ghazil Gaunt,
Chief, Public Finance Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, Boston Regional
Office, 33 Arch Street, 23
rd
Floor, Boston, MA 02110.
D. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall
be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any
award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a
Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting
the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the
Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed
an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty
imposed in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a
private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors
based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this
proceeding.
By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields
Secretary