In re WESTERN STANDARD
Western Standard, LLC, a California-based investment adviser, violated Rule 105 of Regulation M by short-selling 298,674 shares of NetSol Technologies Inc. during the restricted period before purchasing 310,000 shares in its follow-on offering, netting $44,980.30 in illicit profits, and agreed to a cease-and-desist order, disgorgement, interest, and a $65,000 penalty without admitting or denying the allegations.
Western Standard, LLC, a registered investment adviser with $78 million in assets under management, violated Rule 105 of Regulation M by selling short 298,674 shares of NetSol Technologies Inc. (NTWK) between February 24 and March 1, 2012, during the restricted period, then purchasing 310,000 shares in NTWK’s follow-on public offering priced at $0.40 per share. This conduct generated $44,980.30 in illicit profits, which the SEC determined violated the prophylactic rule designed to prevent artificial manipulation of offering prices regardless of intent. Without admitting or denying the findings, Western Standard consented to a cease-and-desist order, agreed to disgorge $44,980.30 plus $1,827.40 in prejudgment interest, and pay a $65,000 civil penalty, totaling $111,807.70, with the SEC noting its cooperation and remedial efforts.
Western Standard, LLC, a California-based registered investment adviser managing over $78 million in assets, violated Rule 105 of Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by selling short 298,674 shares of NetSol Technologies Inc. (NTWK) between February 24 and March 1, 2012, during the restricted period defined as five business days before the pricing of the offering. On March 1, 2012, NTWK priced its follow-on public offering at $0.40 per share, and Western Standard received an allocation of 310,000 shares, resulting in a profit of $44,980.30 from the difference between its short-sale proceeds and the purchase price. Rule 105 prohibits such conduct regardless of intent, as it distorts offering prices by allowing short sellers to artificially depress the market before buying into the offering. The SEC found that Western Standard’s actions constituted a clear violation of the rule’s prophylactic purpose, which aims to ensure offering prices reflect true market supply and demand. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Western Standard consented to a cease-and-desist order and agreed to pay $44,980.30 in disgorgement, $1,827.40 in prejudgment interest, and a $65,000 civil penalty, totaling $111,807.70. The SEC acknowledged the firm’s prompt remedial actions and cooperation with staff as mitigating factors in determining the penalty. Western Standard, which has been registered with the State of California since 2008, was not charged with broader fraud but was held accountable for this specific regulatory breach.
Extracted insights
- $1.00M $1,000,000 $1M–$10M
- $112K $111,807 $100K–$1M
- $65K $65,000 $10K–$100K
- $45K $44,980 $10K–$100K
- $2K $1,827 <$10K
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person western standard
- company western standard, llc
- SEC instituted cease-and-desist proceedings against Western Standard, LLC
- Western Standard, LLC violated Rule 105 of Regulation M
- Western Standard bought offered shares in March 2012
- Western Standard generated profits of $44,980
- Western Standard, LLC is located in Santa Monica, California
- Western Standard registered as investment adviser since October 2008
- Western Standard manages assets under management of $78 million
- Western Standard manages two domestic funds
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 70413 / September 16, 2013
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-15487
In the Matter of
WESTERN STANDARD,
LLC,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER AND CIVIL
PENALTY
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Western Standard, LLC (“Western Standard” or
“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order and Civil Penalty (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M of the
Exchange Act by Western Standard, a California-based registered investment adviser. Rule 105
prohibits buying an equity security made available through a public offering, conducted on a firm
commitment basis, from an underwriter or broker or dealer participating in the offering after
having sold short the same security during the restricted period as defined therein.
2. In March 2012, Western Standard bought offered shares from an underwriter or
broker or dealer participating in a follow-on public offering after having sold short the same
security during the restricted period. These violations collectively resulted in profits of $44,980.
Respondent
3. Western Standard, LLC is a California limited liability company with its principal
place of business in Santa Monica, California. Western Standard, a registered investment adviser
with the state of California since October 2008, manages two domestic funds and has over $78
million in assets under management.
Legal Framework
4. Rule 105 makes it unlawful for a person to purchase equity securities from an
underwriter, broker, or dealer participating in a public offering if that person sold short the
security that is the subject of the offering during the restricted period defined in the rule, absent
an exception. 17 C.F.R. § 242.105; see Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering, Rel.
No. 34-56206, 72 Fed. Reg. 45094 (Aug. 10, 2007) (effective Oct. 9, 2007). The Rule 105
restricted period is the shorter of the period: (1) beginning five business days before the pricing
of the offered securities and ending with such pricing; or (2) beginning with the initial filing of a
registration statement or notification on Exchange Act Form 1-A or Form 1-E and ending with
pricing.
5. “The goal of Rule 105 is to promote offering prices that are based upon open
market prices determined by supply and demand rather than artificial forces.” Final Rule: Short
Sales, Exchange Act Release No. 50103. Rule 105 is prophylactic and prohibits the conduct
irrespective of the short seller’s intent in effecting the short sale.
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person
or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
Western Standard’s Violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M
6. From February 24, 2012 through March 1, 2012, Western Standard sold short
298,674 shares of NetSol Technologies Inc. (“NTWK”) during the restricted period at an average
price of $0.5506 per share. On March 1, 2012, NTWK announced the pricing of a follow-on
offering of its common stock at $0.40 per share. Western Standard received an allocation of
310,000 shares in that offering. The difference between Western Standard’s proceeds from the
restricted period short sales of NTWK shares and the price paid for 298,674 shares received in the
offering was $44,980.30. Thus, Western Standard’s participation in the NTWK offering netted
total profits of $44,980.30.
7. In total, Western Standard’s violations of Rule 105 resulted in profits of
$44,980.30.
Violations
8. As a result of the conduct described above, Western Standard violated Rule 105 of
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Western Standard’s Remedial Efforts
9. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial
acts promptly undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to Commission staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Western Standard’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Western Standard cease
and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 105 of
Regulation M of the Exchange Act;
B. Western Standard shall within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, pay
disgorgement of $44,980.30, prejudgment interest of $1,827.40, and a civil money penalty in the
amount of $65,000 (for a total of $111,807.70) to the United States Treasury. If timely payment is
not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600. Payments must be
made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
2
2
The minimum threshold for transmission of payment electronically is $1,000,000. For amounts below the
threshold, respondents must make payments pursuant to options (2) or (3) above.
4
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through the
SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal
money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-
delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Western Standard as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings;
a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Gerald W. Hodgkins,
Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, DC 20549.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 70413 / September 16, 2013
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-15487
In the Matter of
WESTERN STANDARD,
LLC,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER AND CIVIL
PENALTY
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Western Standard, LLC (“Western Standard” or
“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order and Civil Penalty (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M of the
Exchange Act by Western Standard, a California-based registered investment adviser. Rule 105
prohibits buying an equity security made available through a public offering, conducted on a firm
commitment basis, from an underwriter or broker or dealer participating in the offering after
having sold short the same security during the restricted period as defined therein.
2. In March 2012, Western Standard bought offered shares from an underwriter or
broker or dealer participating in a follow-on public offering after having sold short the same
security during the restricted period. These violations collectively resulted in profits of $44,980.
Respondent
3. Western Standard, LLC is a California limited liability company with its principal
place of business in Santa Monica, California. Western Standard, a registered investment adviser
with the state of California since October 2008, manages two domestic funds and has over $78
million in assets under management.
Legal Framework
4. Rule 105 makes it unlawful for a person to purchase equity securities from an
underwriter, broker, or dealer participating in a public offering if that person sold short the
security that is the subject of the offering during the restricted period defined in the rule, absent
an exception. 17 C.F.R. § 242.105; see Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering, Rel.
No. 34-56206, 72 Fed. Reg. 45094 (Aug. 10, 2007) (effective Oct. 9, 2007). The Rule 105
restricted period is the shorter of the period: (1) beginning five business days before the pricing
of the offered securities and ending with such pricing; or (2) beginning with the initial filing of a
registration statement or notification on Exchange Act Form 1-A or Form 1-E and ending with
pricing.
5. “The goal of Rule 105 is to promote offering prices that are based upon open
market prices determined by supply and demand rather than artificial forces.” Final Rule: Short
Sales, Exchange Act Release No. 50103. Rule 105 is prophylactic and prohibits the conduct
irrespective of the short seller’s intent in effecting the short sale.
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person
or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
Western Standard’s Violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M
6. From February 24, 2012 through March 1, 2012, Western Standard sold short
298,674 shares of NetSol Technologies Inc. (“NTWK”) during the restricted period at an average
price of $0.5506 per share. On March 1, 2012, NTWK announced the pricing of a follow-on
offering of its common stock at $0.40 per share. Western Standard received an allocation of
310,000 shares in that offering. The difference between Western Standard’s proceeds from the
restricted period short sales of NTWK shares and the price paid for 298,674 shares received in the
offering was $44,980.30. Thus, Western Standard’s participation in the NTWK offering netted
total profits of $44,980.30.
7. In total, Western Standard’s violations of Rule 105 resulted in profits of
$44,980.30.
Violations
8. As a result of the conduct described above, Western Standard violated Rule 105 of
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Western Standard’s Remedial Efforts
9. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial
acts promptly undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to Commission staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Western Standard’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Western Standard cease
and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 105 of
Regulation M of the Exchange Act;
B. Western Standard shall within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, pay
disgorgement of $44,980.30, prejudgment interest of $1,827.40, and a civil money penalty in the
amount of $65,000 (for a total of $111,807.70) to the United States Treasury. If timely payment is
not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600. Payments must be
made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;2
2 The minimum threshold for transmission of payment electronically is $1,000,000. For amounts below the
threshold, respondents must make payments pursuant to options (2) or (3) above.
4
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through the
SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal
money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-
delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Western Standard as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings;
a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Gerald W. Hodgkins,
Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, DC 20549.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary