SEC v. Prosperity Consultants, LLC; and Justin R. Kimbrough, No. 4:22-cv-00558, Eastern District of Texas (Sept. 17, 2025) — Judgment
raw: Prosperity Consultants, LLC (“Prosperity” or “Defendant”) having entered a general appearance;
Prosperity Consultants, LLC (“Prosperity” or “Defendant”) having entered a general appearance;, No. 4:22-cv-00558 (Sept. 17, 2025)
Prosperity Consultants, LLC and Justin R. Kimbrough were held liable for securities fraud and ordered to pay over $1.2 million in disgorgement and interest.
The SEC obtained a final judgment against Prosperity Consultants, LLC and Justin R. Kimbrough for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. The defendants were ordered to pay $1,137,437.45 in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus $86,882.82 in prejudgment interest. The court permanently enjoined the defendants from engaging in fraudulent schemes involving misleading information about securities and the misappropriation of funds.
The Securities and Exchange Commission successfully obtained a final judgment against Prosperity Consultants, LLC and Justin R. Kimbrough in the Eastern District of Texas. The defendants were found liable for violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 through fraudulent schemes and misleading communications. Specifically, the fraud involved disseminating false information regarding investment prospects, the use of investor funds, and the misappropriation of proceeds. As a result, the defendants are jointly and severally liable for $1,137,437.45 in disgorgement and $86,882.82 in prejudgment interest. This financial obligation is deemed satisfied via a forfeiture order in the related criminal case, United States v. Justin Kimbrough. The court has permanently enjoined the defendants from future violations of these federal securities laws.
Extracted insights
- $1.14M $1,137,437 $1M–$10M
- $87K $86,882 $10K–$100K
- person general appearance
- company prosperity consultants, llc
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission filed Complaint
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC entered general appearance
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC consented to Court's jurisdiction
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC consented to entry of Final Judgment
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC waived right to appeal
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC is restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC is restrained and enjoined from violating Rules 10b-5(a) and (c)
- Prosperity Consultants, LLC is restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION : SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE : COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 4:22-cv-000558 (SDJ) : v. : : JUSTIN R. KIMBROUGH, : et al., : : Defendants. : : FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO PROSPERITY CONSULTANTS, LLC The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Prosperity Consultants, LLC (“Prosperity” or “Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. SECTION 10(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(a) and (c)], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: 2 (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; or (b)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii) disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or prospective investor, about: (A)any investment in or offering of securities; (B)the prospects for success of any product or company; (C)the use of investor funds; (D)compensation to any person; or (E)the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. SECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(1) and (3)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in 3 interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; or (b)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii) disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or prospective investor, about: (A)any investment in or offering of securities; (B)the prospects for success of any product or company; (C)the use of investor funds; (D)compensation to any person; or (E)the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. DIS GORGEMENT IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and defendant Justin R. Kimbrough are jointly and several liable for and shall pay disgorgement of 4 ill-gotten gains in the amount of $1,137,437.45, with prejudgment interest in the amount of $86,882.82. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s obligation to make this payment shall be deemed satisfied by the entry of the forfeiture order in the related criminal case United States v. Justin Kimbrough, Crim. No. 22-152 (E.D. Tex.). IV. INCORPORATION OF CONSENT IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VI. RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATION There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION : SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE : COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 4:22-cv-000558 (SDJ) : v. : : JUSTIN R. KIMBROUGH, : et al., : : Defendants. : : FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO PROSPERITY CONSULTANTS, LLC The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Prosperity Consultants, LLC (“Prosperity” or “Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. SECTION 10(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(a) and (c)], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: Case 4:22-cv-00558-SDJ Document 62 Filed 08/05/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 308 2 (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; or (b) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii) disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or prospective investor, about: (A) any investment in or offering of securities; (B) the prospects for success of any product or company; (C) the use of investor funds; (D) compensation to any person; or (E) the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. SECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(1) and (3)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in Case 4:22-cv-00558-SDJ Document 62 Filed 08/05/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 309 3 interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; or (b) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii) disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or prospective investor, about: (A) any investment in or offering of securities; (B) the prospects for success of any product or company; (C) the use of investor funds; (D) compensation to any person; or (E) the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. DISGORGEMENT IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and defendant Justin R. Kimbrough are jointly and several liable for and shall pay disgorgement of Case 4:22-cv-00558-SDJ Document 62 Filed 08/05/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 310 4 ill-gotten gains in the amount of $1,137,437.45, with prejudgment interest in the amount of $86,882.82. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s obligation to make this payment shall be deemed satisfied by the entry of the forfeiture order in the related criminal case United States v. Justin Kimbrough, Crim. No. 22-152 (E.D. Tex.). IV. INCORPORATION OF CONSENT IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VI. RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATION There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Case 4:22-cv-00558-SDJ Document 62 Filed 08/05/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 311 SeanJordan Judge Jordan Signature