SEC v. Nanotech Engineering, Inc.; and David Sweaney, No. 1:19-cv-03633, District of Columbia (Oct. 8, 2020) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. NANOTECH ENGINEERING
SEC v. NANOTECH ENGINEERING, No. 1:19-cv-03633 (Oct. 8, 2020)
David Sweaney entered a consent judgment with the SEC to resolve allegations of securities fraud involving Nanotech Engineering, Inc., resulting in a permanent injunction and officer/director bar.
David Sweaney was charged with violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act through fraudulent schemes and material misstatements. The court ordered Sweaney to pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest, though specific amounts were reserved for a later motion. Additionally, the judgment imposes a permanent bar preventing him from serving as an officer or director of any reporting issuer.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against David Sweaney regarding fraudulent activities involving Nanotech Engineering, Inc. Sweaney consented to the judgment, waiving his right to appeal and accepting the allegations in the amended complaint as true for future penalty motions. The court permanently enjoined him from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act through deceptive practices or material omissions. Furthermore, Sweaney is prohibited from serving as an officer or director of any issuer that is required to file reports under the Exchange Act. While the specific amounts for disgorgement, interest, and civil penalties were not set in this order, the court reserved jurisdiction to determine these sums upon a motion by the Commission. The judgment also stipulates that the resulting financial obligations are non-dischargeable in bankruptcy.
Extracted insights
- person amended complaint
- person david sweaney
- person defendant david sweaney
- person general appearance
- court in the u.s. district court for the district of columbia
- agency the u.s. securities and exchange commission
- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an Amended Complaint
- Defendant David Sweaney entered a general appearance
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment
- Defendant David Sweaney waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant David Sweaney waived any right to appeal from this Judgment
- the Court ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]
- the Court ordered the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a)
- the Court ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly
- the Court ordered the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a)
- the Court ordered Defendant is prohibited, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]
- the Court ordered Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest thereon
- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an Amended Complaint
- Defendant David Sweaney entered a general appearance
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment
- Defendant David Sweaney waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant David Sweaney waived any right to appeal from this Judgment
- the Court ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]
- the Court ordered the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
- the Court ordered Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly
- the Court ordered the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
- the Court ordered Defendant is prohibited, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]
- the Court ordered Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest thereon
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an Amended Complaint against Nanotech Engineering, Inc., et al.
- David Sweaney consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over himself and the subject matter of this action
- David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment by the Court
- Court restrained and enjoined David Sweaney from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrained and enjoined David Sweaney from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Court prohibited David Sweaney from acting as an officer or director of any issuer with securities registered under Section 12 or required to file under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an Amended Complaint against Nanotech Engineering, Inc., et al.
- David Sweaney consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over himself and the subject matter of this action
- David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- David Sweaney is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- David Sweaney is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- David Sweaney is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer with securities registered under Section 12 or required to file under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an Amended Complaint against Nanotech Engineering, Inc., et al.
- David Sweaney consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over himself and the subject matter of this action
- David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment without findings of fact or conclusions of law
- David Sweaney is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- David Sweaney is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- David Sweaney is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer with securities registered under Section 12 or required to file under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
- David Sweaney shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed Amended Complaint
- Defendant David Sweaney entered general appearance
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to Court’s jurisdiction
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment
- Defendant David Sweaney waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant David Sweaney waived right to appeal
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Defendant is prohibited from acting as officer or director of any issuer
- Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an Amended Complaint
- Defendant David Sweaney entered a general appearance
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment
- Defendant David Sweaney waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant David Sweaney waived any right to appeal from this Judgment
- Defendant David Sweaney restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant David Sweaney restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Defendant David Sweaney is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer with securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act
- Defendant David Sweaney is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
- Defendant David Sweaney shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest
- Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are bound by this Judgment
- Other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant are bound by this Judgment
- Document 46 was filed on 10/06/20
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed Amended Complaint
- David Sweaney entered general appearance
- David Sweaney consented to Court's jurisdiction
- David Sweaney consented to entry of this Judgment
- David Sweaney waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- David Sweaney waived right to appeal
- Defendant is restrained from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
- Defendant is restrained from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer
- Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed Amended Complaint
- David Sweaney entered general appearance
- David Sweaney consented Court's jurisdiction
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ordered Defendant restrained
- Defendant restrained violating Section 10(b)
- Defendant enjoined using means of interstate commerce
- Defendant prohibited acting as officer or director
- Defendant pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. NANOTECH ENGINEERING, INC., et al., Def endants. Civil Action No. 19-cv-3633 (ABJ) JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT DAVID SWEANEY The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, having filed an Amended Complaint, and Defendant David Sweaney, having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this acti on; consented to entry of this Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment: I. IT IS HER EBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national s ecurities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a)to e mploy any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 2 (b)to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b)to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest thereon; that the amounts of the disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalty shall be determined by the Court upon motion of the Commission; and that prejudgment interest shall be calculated based on the rate of interest used by the Internal Revenue Service for the underpayment of federal income tax as set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 6621(a)(2). Upon motion of the Commission, the Court shall determine whether a civil penalty pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)] is appropriate and, if so, the amount of the penalty. In connection with the Commission’s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Defendant will be precluded from 4 arguing that he did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Amended Complaint; (b) Defendant may not challenge the validity of the Consent or this Final Judgment; (c) solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Amended Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission’s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the Amended Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). 5 VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment. VIII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: ______________, _____ ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2020 October 6
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. NANOTECH ENGINEERING, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 19-cv-3633 (ABJ) JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT DAVID SWEANEY The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, having filed an Amended Complaint, and Defendant David Sweaney, having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; Case 1:19-cv-03633-ABJ Document 46 Filed 10/06/20 Page 1 of 5 2 (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. Case 1:19-cv-03633-ABJ Document 46 Filed 10/06/20 Page 2 of 5 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest thereon; that the amounts of the disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalty shall be determined by the Court upon motion of the Commission; and that prejudgment interest shall be calculated based on the rate of interest used by the Internal Revenue Service for the underpayment of federal income tax as set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 6621(a)(2). Upon motion of the Commission, the Court shall determine whether a civil penalty pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)] is appropriate and, if so, the amount of the penalty. In connection with the Commission’s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Defendant will be precluded from Case 1:19-cv-03633-ABJ Document 46 Filed 10/06/20 Page 3 of 5 4 arguing that he did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Amended Complaint; (b) Defendant may not challenge the validity of the Consent or this Final Judgment; (c) solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Amended Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission’s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the Amended Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). Case 1:19-cv-03633-ABJ Document 46 Filed 10/06/20 Page 4 of 5 5 VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment. VIII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: ______________, _____ ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2020October 6 Case 1:19-cv-03633-ABJ Document 46 Filed 10/06/20 Page 5 of 5 DIANNEKEPPLER New Stamp