SEC v. James D. Burleson; and Burleson & Company, LLC, No. LR-26385, Northern District of California (Aug. 26, 2025) — Press Release
raw: James D. Burleson
James D. Burleson, No. 3:24-cv-08246-VC (Aug. 26, 2025)
James D. Burleson, former managing partner of Burleson & Company, LLC, obtained a final judgment for a cherry-picking scheme that favored his personal account over his clients.
James D. Burleson engaged in a cherry-picking scheme from August 2020 to October 2022 by disproportionately allocating profitable option trades to himself and losses to clients. He faced charges for violating the Exchange Act, the Securities Act, and the Investment Advisers Act. The final judgment requires Burleson to pay $1,837,700 in disgorgement, $216,590 in interest, and a $230,464 civil penalty.
James D. Burleson, the former managing partner of Burleson & Company, LLC, has reached a final judgment with the SEC regarding a cherry-picking scheme. Between August 2020 and October 2022, Burleson used an omnibus trading account to allocate profitable option trades to his personal account while shifting unprofitable trades to his clients. To resolve violations of the Exchange Act, the Securities Act, and the Investment Advisers Act, he agreed to pay a total of approximately $2.28 million in disgorgement, interest, and penalties. Burleson also consented to a five-year bar from associating with various financial industry entities, including brokers, dealers, and investment advisers. The final judgment permanently enjoins him from future violations of federal securities laws. This settlement also resolves a concurrent administrative proceeding initiated by the SEC.
Extracted insights
- $1.84M $1,837,700 $1M–$10M
- $230K $230,464 $100K–$1M
- $217K $216,590 $100K–$1M
- person douglas m. miller
- person final judgment
- person James D. Burleson
- person matthew montgomery
- person robert conrrad
- agency sec's investigation
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- organization Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission obtained final judgment against James D. Burleson
- James D. Burleson used firm's omnibus trading account
- James D. Burleson allocated profitable option trades to his personal account
- James D. Burleson allocated unprofitable options trades to his clients' accounts
- James D. Burleson consented to final judgment
- James D. Burleson agreed to pay $1,837,700 in disgorgement
- James D. Burleson agreed to pay $216,590 in prejudgment interest
- James D. Burleson agreed to pay $230,464 in civil penalty
- Securities And Exchange Commission initiated administrative proceeding against James D. Burleson
- James D. Burleson agreed to bar from association with any broker or dealer
- Matthew Montgomery conducted SEC's investigation
- Robert Conrrad supervised SEC's investigation
- Douglas M. Miller supervised litigation
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26385 / August 26, 2025 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James D. Burleson, No. 3:24-cv-08246-VC (N.D. Cal. filed Nov. 21, 2024) SEC Obtains Final Judgment in Cherry-Picking Scheme On August 6, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against James D. Burleson, who was the managing partner of the formerly SEC-registered investment advisory firm Burleson & Company, LLC, whom the SEC previously charged with engaging in a “cherry-picking” scheme. On November 21, 2024, the SEC filed a complaint alleging that, from August 2020 to October 2022, Burleson used his firm’s omnibus trading account to disproportionately allocate profitable option trades to his personal account and disproportionately allocate unprofitable options trades to his clients’ accounts. Burleson consented to a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act. Burleson agreed to pay disgorgement of $1,837,700, prejudgment interest in the amount of $216,590, and a civil penalty in the amount of $230,464. As part of the settlement, Burleson also agreed to settle the administrative proceeding the SEC initiated against him, consenting to a bar from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization with the right to apply for reentry after five years. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Matthew Montgomery and supervised by Robert Conrrad of the Los Angeles Regional Office. The litigation was supervised by Douglas M. Miller.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26385 / August 26, 2025 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James D. Burleson, No. 3:24-cv-08246-VC (N.D. Cal. filed Nov. 21, 2024) SEC Obtains Final Judgment in Cherry-Picking Scheme On August 6, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against James D. Burleson, who was the managing partner of the formerly SEC-registered investment advisory firm Burleson & Company, LLC, whom the SEC previously charged with engaging in a “cherry-picking” scheme. On November 21, 2024, the SEC filed a complaint alleging that, from August 2020 to October 2022, Burleson used his firm’s omnibus trading account to disproportionately allocate profitable option trades to his personal account and disproportionately allocate unprofitable options trades to his clients’ accounts. Burleson consented to a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act. Burleson agreed to pay disgorgement of $1,837,700, prejudgment interest in the amount of $216,590, and a civil penalty in the amount of $230,464. As part of the settlement, Burleson also agreed to settle the administrative proceeding the SEC initiated against him, consenting to a bar from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization with the right to apply for reentry after five years. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Matthew Montgomery and supervised by Robert Conrrad of the Los Angeles Regional Office. The litigation was supervised by Douglas M. Miller.