SEC v. David Sechovicz; and Peter Szatmari, No. LR-24631, District of Massachusetts (Sept. 30, 2019) — Press Release
raw: David Sechovicz and Peter Szatmari
David Sechovicz and Peter Szatmari, No. LR-24631 (Sept. 30, 2019)
Internet marketers Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz allegedly swindled Main Street investors through phony infomercials, with Sechovicz agreeing to pay $1,899,837 in disgorgement, $83,571 in pre-judgment interest, and a $949,918 civil penalty.
Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz, internet marketing business partners, allegedly created and disseminated elaborate rags-to-riches videos to trick vulnerable retirees and other Main Street investors into trading binary options. The scheme exposed millions of prospective investors to false marketing materials, resulting in ill-gotten gains of at least $1,899,837. Sechovicz has consented to a settlement, agreeing to pay $1,899,837 in disgorgement, $83,571 in pre-judgment interest, and a civil penalty of $949,918.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged internet marketing business partners Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz with allegedly creating and disseminating elaborate rags-to-riches videos to trick vulnerable retirees and other Main Street investors into trading binary options. The scheme exposed millions of prospective investors to false marketing materials, including deceptive websites, fake news articles, and fabricated videos showing 'live' account funding and gains. The defendants allegedly violated the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as the registration provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act. Sechovicz has consented to a settlement, agreeing to pay $1,899,837 in disgorgement, $83,571 in pre-judgment interest, and a civil penalty of $949,918, subject to court approval. Szatmari's case remains ongoing. The SEC's investigation was conducted with assistance from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Exhibits & Attached Documents (2)
Extracted insights
- $1.90M $1,899,837 $1M–$10M
- $950K $949,918 $100K–$1M
- $84K $83,571 $10K–$100K
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- organization Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz with creating and disseminating elaborate rags-to-riches videos to trick vulnerable retirees
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz with allegedly creating and disseminating elaborate rags-to-riches videos to trick vulnerable retirees
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged internet marketing business partners
- Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz allegedly creating elaborate rags-to-riches videos
- Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz allegedly disseminating elaborate rags-to-riches videos
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sechovicz
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed Securities and Exchange Commission v. Szatmari
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Swindling Main Street Investors Through Phony Infomercials
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz with creating and disseminating phony infomercials to swindle retirees
SEC Charges Internet Marketers with Swindling Main Street Investors Through Phony Infomercials Litigation Release No. 24631 / September 30, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sechovicz, No. 19-cv-12027 (D. Mass. filed September 27, 2019) and Securities and Exchange Commission v. Szatmari, No. 19-cv-12028 (D. Mass. filed September 27, 2019) The Securities and Exchange Commission charged internet marketing business partners Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz with allegedly creating and disseminating elaborate rags-to-riches videos to trick vulnerable retirees and other Main Street investors into opening brokerage accounts and trading securities known as binary options. According to the SEC's complaints, filed in federal district court in Boston, defendants created and disseminated fraudulent marketing materials, such as deceptive websites, advertisements styled as news articles, and fraudulent emails. The complaints allege that defendants, acting as "affiliate marketers," also exposed millions of prospective investors in the United States to professional looking, but false, videos. The videos, which depicted purported investors enjoying lavish lifestyles from trading binary options and showed "live" demonstrations of investors opening and funding binary option trading accounts and watching their trading balances increase automatically, were, according to the complaint, pure fiction. The SEC's complaints charge defendants with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and the registration provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act. The complaints seek injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. Sechovicz has consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, to the entry of a final judgment that imposes permanent injunctions from violations of the charged provisions and orders him to pay $1,899,837 in disgorgement, $83,571 in pre-judgment interest, and a civil penalty of $949,918. The settlement is subject to court approval. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jason Anthony, Michael Fuchs, and Deborah Maisel and supervised by Jennifer Leete. The SEC's litigation is being led by Kenneth Donnelly and Samantha Williams. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Investors can learn more about the dangers of binary options schemes by watching this short video. The SEC's Office of Investor Education and Advocacy has issued investor guidance cautioning investors to be aware of fraudulent promotion schemes involving binary options and binary options trading platforms, as well as guidance for senior citizens on how they can protect themselves from fraud. SEC Complaint - Sechovicz SEC Complaint - Szatmari
SEC Charges Internet Marketers with Swindling Main Street Investors Through Phony Infomercials Litigation Release No. 24631 / September 30, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sechovicz, No. 19-cv-12027 (D. Mass. filed September 27, 2019) and Securities and Exchange Commission v. Szatmari, No. 19-cv-12028 (D. Mass. filed September 27, 2019) The Securities and Exchange Commission charged internet marketing business partners Peter Szatmari and David Sechovicz with allegedly creating and disseminating elaborate rags-to-riches videos to trick vulnerable retirees and other Main Street investors into opening brokerage accounts and trading securities known as binary options. According to the SEC's complaints, filed in federal district court in Boston, defendants created and disseminated fraudulent marketing materials, such as deceptive websites, advertisements styled as news articles, and fraudulent emails. The complaints allege that defendants, acting as "affiliate marketers," also exposed millions of prospective investors in the United States to professional looking, but false, videos. The videos, which depicted purported investors enjoying lavish lifestyles from trading binary options and showed "live" demonstrations of investors opening and funding binary option trading accounts and watching their trading balances increase automatically, were, according to the complaint, pure fiction. The SEC's complaints charge defendants with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and the registration provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act. The complaints seek injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. Sechovicz has consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, to the entry of a final judgment that imposes permanent injunctions from violations of the charged provisions and orders him to pay $1,899,837 in disgorgement, $83,571 in pre-judgment interest, and a civil penalty of $949,918. The settlement is subject to court approval. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jason Anthony, Michael Fuchs, and Deborah Maisel and supervised by Jennifer Leete. The SEC's litigation is being led by Kenneth Donnelly and Samantha Williams. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Investors can learn more about the dangers of binary options schemes by watching this short video. The SEC's Office of Investor Education and Advocacy has issued investor guidance cautioning investors to be aware of fraudulent promotion schemes involving binary options and binary options trading platforms, as well as guidance for senior citizens on how they can protect themselves from fraud. SEC Complaint - Sechovicz SEC Complaint - Szatmari