SEC v. IVARS AUZINS, No. 1:21-cv-06693, Eastern District of New York (Mar. 28, 2025) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. IVARS AUZINS
SEC v. IVARS AUZINS, No. 1:21-cv-06693 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2025)
Ivars Auzins, also known as Ron Ramsey, entered a final judgment with the SEC to resolve allegations of securities fraud and unregistered crypto asset offerings.
The court ordered Ivars Auzins to pay $412,201.15, consisting of $300,000 in disgorgement and $112,201.15 in prejudgment interest, which was satisfied via a related criminal forfeiture order. Auzins was permanently enjoined from violating Sections 10(b) of the Exchange Act and 17(a) of the Securities Act. Additionally, the judgment imposes a ten-year prohibition on his participation in any crypto asset offerings sold as securities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against Ivars Auzins, also known as Ron Ramsey, for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. The court permanently enjoined Auzins from engaging in fraudulent schemes, making untrue statements of material fact, and the unregistered sale of securities. Auzins was ordered to pay a total of $412,201.15, which includes $300,000 in disgorgement and $112,201.15 in prejudgment interest, though this amount was deemed satisfied by a related criminal forfeiture order. Furthermore, the judgment prohibits Auzins from participating in any crypto asset offerings sold as securities for a period of ten years. The defendant consented to the court's jurisdiction and the entry of the judgment, waiving his right to appeal. This resolution concludes the SEC's civil enforcement action regarding his fraudulent conduct.
Extracted insights
- $412K $412,201 $100K–$1M
- $300K $300,000 $100K–$1M
- $112K $112,201 $100K–$1M
- person ivars auzins ×2
- person Daniel Gaines
- person Ron Ramsey
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission filed a Complaint Ivars Auzins
- Ivars Auzins consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Ivars Auzins consented to entry of this Final Judgment and waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Ivars Auzins waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Court restrained and enjoined Defendant from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Court restrained and enjoined Defendant from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Court restrained and enjoined Defendant from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- IVARS AUZINS, A/K/A RON RAMSEY and DANIEL GAINES, Defendant. 21 Civ. 6693 (LDH) (MMH) FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT AVARS AUZINS The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Ivars Auzins (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearanc e; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment, waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 2 (b)to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b)to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c)Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination 4 under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sections 21(d)(1) and 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(1) and (5)], and Section 20(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date of entry of this Final Judgment, from directly or indirectly participating in any offering of a crypto asset offered and sold as a security, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any crypto asset offered and sold as a security, provided, however, that such injunction shall not prevent Defendant from purchasing or selling crypto assets for his own personal account. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and/or Section 20(e) of the Securities Act 5 [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date of entry of this Final Judgment, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $300,000 together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount $112,201.15, for a total of $412,201.15. Defendant’s obligation to pay this amount of disgorgement and prejudgment interest is deemed satisfied by entry of the forfeiture order of against him in the related criminal case, United States v. Auzins, 21-CR-00357 (E.D.N.Y.) (Dkt. # 42). VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). 6 VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. Dated: ______________, _____ ____________________________________ HONORABLE LASHANN DEARCY HALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE February 5 2025 s/ LDH
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- IVARS AUZINS, A/K/A RON RAMSEY and DANIEL GAINES, Defendant. 21 Civ. 6693 (LDH) (MMH) FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT AVARS AUZINS The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Ivars Auzins (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment, waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH Document 18 Filed 02/07/25 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 88 2 (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH Document 18 Filed 02/07/25 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 89 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH Document 18 Filed 02/07/25 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 90 4 under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sections 21(d)(1) and 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(1) and (5)], and Section 20(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date of entry of this Final Judgment, from directly or indirectly participating in any offering of a crypto asset offered and sold as a security, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any crypto asset offered and sold as a security, provided, however, that such injunction shall not prevent Defendant from purchasing or selling crypto assets for his own personal account. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and/or Section 20(e) of the Securities Act Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH Document 18 Filed 02/07/25 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 91 5 [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date of entry of this Final Judgment, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $300,000 together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount $112,201.15, for a total of $412,201.15. Defendant’s obligation to pay this amount of disgorgement and prejudgment interest is deemed satisfied by entry of the forfeiture order of against him in the related criminal case, United States v. Auzins, 21-CR-00357 (E.D.N.Y.) (Dkt. # 42). VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH Document 18 Filed 02/07/25 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 92 6 VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. Dated: ______________, _____ ____________________________________ HONORABLE LASHANN DEARCY HALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE February 5 2025 s/ LDH Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH Document 18 Filed 02/07/25 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 93