2025-03-10 sec-litreleases litigation_release 65 KB 2,879 chars

SEC v. Peter Stuart; and Outlier Realty Capital (27 companies), No. LR-26263, District of Maryland (Mar. 10, 2025) — Press Release

raw: Peter Stuart, et al.

Peter Stuart, et al., No. 8:25-cv-00761 (Mar. 10, 2025)

Caption
Michael Alvidrez v. Covetrus Software Services, LLC
summary

Peter Stuart and twenty-seven Outlier Realty Capital companies settled SEC charges for misleading investors by commingling $50 million in funds, resulting in a $3.3 million settlement.

paragraph

Peter Stuart and twenty-seven real estate companies were charged with violating the Securities Act of 1933 by misrepresenting the use of $34.4 million in investor funds. The defendants allegedly commingled over $50 million to cover corporate overhead and underpaid investors by approximately $1.47 million. The settlement requires Stuart and thirteen companies to pay over $3.3 million in disgorgement, interest, and civil penalties.

narrative

The SEC charged D.C. real estate developer Peter Stuart and twenty-seven companies under Outlier Realty Capital with negligently misleading investors regarding the use of capital. While raising at least $34.4 million for specific real estate projects, the defendants allegedly commingled over $50 million to cover corporate overhead and other projects. This mismanagement led to the underpayment of investors by approximately $1.47 million upon property sales. To settle the charges, Stuart and thirteen corporate entities agreed to pay more than $3.3 million in combined disgorgement, interest, and penalties. Stuart also faces a five-year bar from serving as a public company officer or director and a five-year injunction on securities participation. Additionally, the settlement mandates the appointment of an independent consultant to reconcile accounts and oversee the sale of five properties.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
investment-adviser-fraud (95%)
Court
District of Maryland
Case No.
8:25-cv-00761
Outcome
settled
Settlement
$240,464
Disgorgement
$1,471,440
Victim loss
$50,000,000
Victims
100
Entity
Peter Stuart
Classified investment-adviser-fraud(confidence 95%). EDGAR detection: forms ADV/ADV-E/ADV-W/Form D· recall 33% / precision 13%. detection rule →
Parties
Michael AlvidrezCovetrus Software Services, LLC
Keywords
real estatestuartpeter stuartsecuritiessecagreedsecurities exchangeexchange commissionthirteen corporaterealestateinvestorsfundspetercorporate

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 7
  • $50.00M $50 million $10M–$100M
  • $34.40M $34.4 million $10M–$100M
  • $3.30M $3.3 million $1M–$10M
  • $1.47M $1,471,440 $1M–$10M
  • $1.47M $1.47 million $1M–$10M
  • $240K $240,464 $100K–$1M
  • $160K $159,936 $100K–$1M
Entities 7
  • person charlie divine
  • court complaint in u.s. district court for the district of maryland
  • person melissa armstrong
  • company outlier realty capital
  • person peter stuart
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • person thirteen corporate defendants
Triples 15
  • Securities And Exchange Commission charged Peter Stuart and twenty-seven real estate companies
  • Peter Stuart operated Outlier Realty Capital
  • Peter Stuart and Outlier Realty Capital defendants raised $34.4 million
  • Peter Stuart and Outlier Realty Capital defendants commingled $50 million of property-specific funds
  • Peter Stuart and Outlier Realty Capital defendants underpaid investors by $1.47 million
  • Securities And Exchange Commission filed complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
  • Peter Stuart and thirteen corporate defendants agreed to pay $3.3 million
  • Peter Stuart and thirteen corporate defendants agreed to be liable for $1,471,440 disgorgement plus $159,936 prejudgment interest
  • thirteen corporate defendants agreed to be liable for $1,471,440 civil penalty
  • Peter Stuart agreed to pay $240,464 civil penalty
  • Securities And Exchange Commission investigated case
  • Christina Adams and John Higgins conducted investigation
  • Kristen Dieter and Mark Cave supervised investigation
  • Charlie Divine led litigation
  • Melissa Armstrong supervised litigation
PDF (from attached: complaint)
Text layers
Extracted body text (2,879c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26263 / March 10, 2025 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Peter Stuart, et al., No. 8:25-cv-00761 (D. Md. filed Mar. 7, 2025) SEC Charges Washington, D.C. Real Estate Developer And Twenty-Seven Companies With Negligently Misleading Investors On March 7, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Peter Stuart and twenty-seven real estate companies he collectively operated as Outlier Realty Capital with misleading investors about how their funds would be used. The defendants have agreed to settle the charges, with Stuart and thirteen of the corporate defendants agreeing to pay a total of more than $3.3 million. According to the SEC’s complaint, Stuart and the Outlier Realty Capital defendants raised at least $34.4 million from approximately 100 investors by selling securities in companies created to invest in real estate in Washington, D.C., Maryland, or Virginia, and by representing that investor funds would be used for specific real estate projects. The complaint alleges that, in reality, the defendants commingled more than $50 million of property-specific funds, including funds from investors, and used the commingled funds for other real estate projects and to cover corporate and overhead expenses such as salaries. The complaint also alleges that when some of the properties were sold, the defendants underpaid investors by approximately $1.47 million. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, charges the defendants with violating Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, the defendants have agreed to settle the SEC’s charges. The defendants have agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating the provisions of the federal securities laws with which they are charged and to install an independent consultant to, among other things, reconcile the defendants’ accounts and oversee the orderly sale of five properties. Stuart and thirteen of the corporate defendants have agreed to be jointly and severally liable for disgorgement of ill-gotten gains of $1,471,440 plus $159,936 in prejudgment interest. The same thirteen corporate defendants have agreed to be jointly and severally liable for a $1,471,440 civil penalty. Stuart has agreed to pay a $240,464 civil penalty, to a five-year bar from serving as an officer or director of a public company, and to a five-year injunction prohibiting him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security, except for his own account. The settlement is subject to court approval. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Christina Adams and John Higgins and supervised by Kristen Dieter and Mark Cave. The litigation will be led by Charlie Divine and supervised by Melissa Armstrong.
OCR text (2,879c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26263 / March 10, 2025 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Peter Stuart, et al., No. 8:25-cv-00761 (D. Md. filed Mar. 7, 2025) SEC Charges Washington, D.C. Real Estate Developer And Twenty-Seven Companies With Negligently Misleading Investors On March 7, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Peter Stuart and twenty-seven real estate companies he collectively operated as Outlier Realty Capital with misleading investors about how their funds would be used. The defendants have agreed to settle the charges, with Stuart and thirteen of the corporate defendants agreeing to pay a total of more than $3.3 million. According to the SEC’s complaint, Stuart and the Outlier Realty Capital defendants raised at least $34.4 million from approximately 100 investors by selling securities in companies created to invest in real estate in Washington, D.C., Maryland, or Virginia, and by representing that investor funds would be used for specific real estate projects. The complaint alleges that, in reality, the defendants commingled more than $50 million of property-specific funds, including funds from investors, and used the commingled funds for other real estate projects and to cover corporate and overhead expenses such as salaries. The complaint also alleges that when some of the properties were sold, the defendants underpaid investors by approximately $1.47 million. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, charges the defendants with violating Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, the defendants have agreed to settle the SEC’s charges. The defendants have agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating the provisions of the federal securities laws with which they are charged and to install an independent consultant to, among other things, reconcile the defendants’ accounts and oversee the orderly sale of five properties. Stuart and thirteen of the corporate defendants have agreed to be jointly and severally liable for disgorgement of ill-gotten gains of $1,471,440 plus $159,936 in prejudgment interest. The same thirteen corporate defendants have agreed to be jointly and severally liable for a $1,471,440 civil penalty. Stuart has agreed to pay a $240,464 civil penalty, to a five-year bar from serving as an officer or director of a public company, and to a five-year injunction prohibiting him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security, except for his own account. The settlement is subject to court approval. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Christina Adams and John Higgins and supervised by Kristen Dieter and Mark Cave. The litigation will be led by Charlie Divine and supervised by Melissa Armstrong.