2024-10-15 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 2,971 chars

SEC v. Vy Pham, No. LR-26153, District of Massachusetts (Oct. 15, 2024) — Press Release

raw: Vy Pham

Vy Pham, No. 1:24-cv-12588-AK (Oct. 15, 2024)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vy Pham
summary

Vy Pham was charged by the SEC for manipulating the Saitama Inu and Robo Inu crypto assets through coordinated purchases and artificial volume to defraud retail investors.

paragraph

The SEC charged California resident Vy Pham with violating the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 through market manipulation schemes. Pham allegedly used coordinated purchases for Saitama Inu and hired Gotbit Consulting LLC to provide 'market-manipulation-as-a-service' for Robo Inu. The settlement includes a permanent injunction and an officer-and-director bar, with the court to determine final disgorgement and civil penalties.

narrative

The SEC has charged crypto promoter Vy Pham for manipulating the markets of 'Saitama Inu' and 'Robo Inu' crypto assets offered as unregistered securities. To lure retail investors, Pham allegedly engaged in coordinated purchases for Saitama Inu and hired Gotbit Consulting LLC to generate artificial trading volume for Robo Inu. These actions violated multiple provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Pham has consented to a bifurcated settlement that includes a permanent injunction and a bar from serving as an officer or director. The SEC is also seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and civil penalties, the specific amounts of which will be determined by the court. This enforcement action runs parallel to a criminal action led by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
market-manipulation (100%)
Court
District of Massachusetts
Case No.
1:24-cv-12588-AK
Entity
Vy Pham
Classified market-manipulation(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms SC 13D/G/13F· recall 53% / precision 9%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionVy Pham
Keywords
securitiescrypto assetphamcryptosecsecurities exchangeinuexchange commissioncrypto assetsoffered soldsold securitiesassetexchangemarketsecurities retail

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Entities 8
  • person bifurcated settlement
  • agency Federal Bureau of Investigation
  • company gotbit consulting llc
  • person robo inu
  • person saitama inu
  • agency sec’s complaint
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • person vy pham
Triples 10
  • Securities And Exchange Commission announced fraud charges against Vy Pham
  • Vy Pham engaged in schemes to manipulate Markets For Saitama Inu And Robo Inu
  • Vy Pham personally engaged in market manipulation of Saitama Inu
  • Pham hired Gotbit Consulting LLC
  • Gotbit Consulting LLC provided market‑manipulation‑as‑a‑service Robo Inu
  • SEC’s complaint alleges Pham violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a)(1), 17(a)(3) Of The Securities Act Of 1933 And Sections 9(a)(2) And 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
  • SEC’s complaint seeks Permanent Injunction, Conduct‑Based Injunction, Disgorgement Of Ill‑Gotten Gains, Pre‑Judgment Interest, Civil Penalties, Officer‑And‑Director Bar
  • Pham consented to Bifurcated Settlement
  • SEC appreciates assistance of FBI
  • SEC appreciates assistance of United States Attorney’s Office For The District Of Massachusetts
PDF (from attached: complaint)
Text layers
Extracted body text (2,971c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26153 / October 15, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vy Pham, No. 1:24-cv-12588-AK (D. Mass. filed Oct. 9, 2024) SEC Charges Promoter in Crackdown on Manipulation of Crypto Assets Offered and Sold as Securities The Securities and Exchange Commission announced fraud charges against Vy Pham, a resident of California, for engaging in schemes to manipulate the markets for two crypto assets, “Saitama Inu” and “Robo Inu,” being offered and sold as securities to retail investors. As alleged, the schemes were intended to induce investor victims to purchase the crypto assets by creating the false appearance of an active trading market for them. According to the SEC’s complaint, crypto asset promoter Pham personally engaged in market manipulation of the Saitama Inu crypto asset through coordinated purchases with other promoters designed to lure in new investors by creating the illusion of growing market interest in Saitama Inu. For the Robo Inu crypto asset, Pham allegedly.hired so-called market maker Gotbit Consulting LLC to provide market-manipulation-as-a-service, which included generating artificial trading volume or manipulating the price of the Robo Inu crypto asset that was offered and sold as securities to retail investors in unregistered transactions. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleges that Pham violated Sections 5(a), 5(c),17(a)(1), and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 9(a)(2) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction, conduct-based injunction, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains plus pre-judgment interest, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar. Pham consented to a bifurcated settlement, subject to court approval, permanently enjoining her from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, subjecting her to a conduct-based injunction, and barring her from acting as an officer or director. The court will determine the amount of disgorgement and prejudgment interest and any civil penalties. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the FBI and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, which has announced a parallel criminal action. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by David D’Addio, Amy Harman Burkart, Ivan Panchenko, Jeffrey Cook, and John McCann in the SEC’s Boston Regional Office, as well as Colin Missett and Joy Guo of the Crypto Asset and Cyber Unit (CACU). They were supervised by Amy Gwiazda, Michael Brennan, Donald Battle, and Jorge Tenreiro of CACU and by Celia Moore and John T. Dugan of the Boston Regional Office. The team also thanks the staff of the SEC’s Office of Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology for their assistance. The litigation will be led by Mr. D’Addio and Ms. Burkart.
OCR text (2,971c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26153 / October 15, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vy Pham, No. 1:24-cv-12588-AK (D. Mass. filed Oct. 9, 2024) SEC Charges Promoter in Crackdown on Manipulation of Crypto Assets Offered and Sold as Securities The Securities and Exchange Commission announced fraud charges against Vy Pham, a resident of California, for engaging in schemes to manipulate the markets for two crypto assets, “Saitama Inu” and “Robo Inu,” being offered and sold as securities to retail investors. As alleged, the schemes were intended to induce investor victims to purchase the crypto assets by creating the false appearance of an active trading market for them. According to the SEC’s complaint, crypto asset promoter Pham personally engaged in market manipulation of the Saitama Inu crypto asset through coordinated purchases with other promoters designed to lure in new investors by creating the illusion of growing market interest in Saitama Inu. For the Robo Inu crypto asset, Pham allegedly.hired so-called market maker Gotbit Consulting LLC to provide market-manipulation-as-a-service, which included generating artificial trading volume or manipulating the price of the Robo Inu crypto asset that was offered and sold as securities to retail investors in unregistered transactions. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleges that Pham violated Sections 5(a), 5(c),17(a)(1), and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 9(a)(2) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction, conduct-based injunction, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains plus pre-judgment interest, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar. Pham consented to a bifurcated settlement, subject to court approval, permanently enjoining her from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, subjecting her to a conduct-based injunction, and barring her from acting as an officer or director. The court will determine the amount of disgorgement and prejudgment interest and any civil penalties. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the FBI and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, which has announced a parallel criminal action. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by David D’Addio, Amy Harman Burkart, Ivan Panchenko, Jeffrey Cook, and John McCann in the SEC’s Boston Regional Office, as well as Colin Missett and Joy Guo of the Crypto Asset and Cyber Unit (CACU). They were supervised by Amy Gwiazda, Michael Brennan, Donald Battle, and Jorge Tenreiro of CACU and by Celia Moore and John T. Dugan of the Boston Regional Office. The team also thanks the staff of the SEC’s Office of Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology for their assistance. The litigation will be led by Mr. D’Addio and Ms. Burkart.