SEC v. COINBASE INC, No. 1:23-cv-04738, Southern District of New York (June 6, 2023)
raw: Defendants Coinbase, Inc. ("Coinbase") and Coinbase Global, Inc. ("CGI") (collectively, the
Defendants Coinbase, Inc. ("Coinbase") and Coinbase Global, Inc. ("CGI") (collectively, the, No. 1:23-cv-04738 (S.D.N.Y. June 6, 2023)
The SEC accused Coinbase, Inc. and Coinbase Global, Inc. of alleged securities law violations and the case was dismissed with prejudice.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued Coinbase, Inc. and its affiliate Coinbase Global, Inc. in a civil enforcement action filed on June 6, 2023 alleging securities-law violations. The complaint did not specify key dollar amounts or detailed fraud allegations. The case was dismissed with prejudice on February 27, 2025, with Coinbase withdrawing its petition for an interlocutory appeal and agreeing to waive any fee-recovery or other claims against the SEC.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued Coinbase, Inc. and its affiliate Coinbase Global, Inc. in a civil enforcement action filed on June 6, 2023 alleging securities-law violations related to the companies’ crypto-asset activities. The complaint did not specify key dollar amounts or detailed fraud allegations, but the SEC’s complaint sought to hold the firms accountable for the conduct described in the complaint. The case had previously undergone a partial motion for judgment on the pleadings, with the court granting part of Coinbase's motion. On February 27, 2025, the parties entered a joint stipulation that dismisses the case with prejudice, with Coinbase withdrawing its petition for an interlocutory appeal and agreeing to waive any fee-recovery or other claims against the SEC. The dismissal resolves the litigation without costs or fees to either side and does not affect the SEC’s stance on any other pending matters. The SEC, in light of ongoing regulatory developments, including the launch of a crypto task force, decided to dismiss the case with prejudice.
Extracted insights
- $1K $ 1292 <$10K
- person mark t. uyeda
- Securities and Exchange Commission Filed Complaint June 6, 2023
- Court Entered Order March 27, 2024
- Court Granted Motion in part and denied in part
- Defendants Moved To Certify interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
- Court Granted Motion January 7, 2025
- Mark T. Uyeda Launched Crypto Task Force January 21, 2025
- Commission Believes Dismissal appropriate
- Commission and Defendants Agree To Dismiss Litigation
- Defendants Agree To Withdraw petition for permission to file an appeal
- Defendants Withdraw Request interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
- Defendants Waive And Release rights under the Equal Access to Justice Act and related statutes
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
V.
COINBASE, INC. and COINBASE GLOBAL, INC.
Defendants.
23 Civ. 4738 (KPF)
JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS, AND RELEASES
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") and
Defendants Coinbase, Inc. ("Coinbase") and Coinbase Global, Inc. ("CGI") (collectively, the
"Defendants") respectfully submit this joint stipulation.
WHEREAS, the Commission filed its complaint in this civil enforcement action (the
"Litigation") on June 6, 2023.
WHEREAS, on March 27, 2024, the Court entered an order on Defendants' motion for
judgment on the pleadings, in which the Court granted the motion in part and denied the motion
in part. SEC v. Coinbase Inc., et al., 726 F. Supp. 3d 260 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2024), motion to
certify appeal granted, No. 23 CIV. 4738 (KPF), 2025 WL 40782 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2025).
WHEREAS, Defendants moved to certify an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292(b) ofthe Court's March 27, 2024 Order and this Court granted such motion on January 7,
2025.
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2025, the Commission's Acting Chairman Mark T. Uyeda
launched a crypto task force dedicated to helping the Commission develop the regulatory
framework for crypto assets.
WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, and in the exercise of its discretion and as a policy
matter, the Commission believes the dismissal ofthis case is appropriate.
WHEREAS, the Commission's decision to seek dismissal ofthis Litigation does not
necessarily reflect the Commission's position on any other case.
WHEREAS, by this stipulation, the Commission and the Defendants agree to have this
Litigation dismissed, and Defendants agree to withdraw their petition for permission to file an
appeal under 28 U.S.C. $ 1292(b) (see Coinbase, Inc. v. SEC, No. 25-145 (2d Cir.)), and to the
dismissal of any such appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE,
1.Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii), the Commission and the Defendants
stipulate that this Litigation be dismissed with prejudice as to the conduct alleged in the
Complaint through the date ofthe filing ofthis Stipulation, and without costs or fees to either
party.
2.Defendants withdraw their request for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. S
l 292(b) and will file with the Court ofAppeals for the Second Circuit any papers necessary to
effectuate such withdrawal and the dismissal of any such appeal.
3.Defendants, for themselves and any oftheir agents, attorneys, employees, or
representatives, hereby waive and release:
a. Any and all rights under the Equal Access to Justice Act, the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, or any other provision oflaw to
seek from the United States, or any agency, or any official ofthe United States
acting in his or her official capacity, directly or indirectly, reimbursement of
attorney's fees or other fees, expenses, or costs expended by Defendant[s] that
in any way relate to (i) the Litigation, including but not limited to investigative
steps taken prior to commencing the Litigation, (ii) the petition for interlocutory
review, and (iii) the appeal of the Litigation.
2
b. Any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action of every kind and
nature, asserted or unasserted, against the Commission and its present and
former officers or employees that arise from or in any way relate to (i) the
Litigation, including but not limited to investigative steps taken prior to
commencing the Litigation, (ii) the petition for interlocutory review, and (iii) the
appeal ofthe Litigation.
4.Each ofthe undersigned represents that they have the authority to execute this
stipulation on behalfofthe party so indicated.
STIPULATED AND AGREED:
.s.as
Acting Director
ANTONIAM. APPS
Acting Deputy Director
Enforcement Division
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
NICHOLAS C. MARGIDA
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Dated: fhra4y 27 ,2025
I
wt7KMsAVITT
KEVINS. SCHWARTZ
SARAH K. EDDY
WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ
51 WEST 52N STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
STEVENR. PEIKIN
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 BROAD STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10004
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS
COINBASE, INC. AND COINBASE,
GLOBAL, INC.
Dated: February 25 ,2025
3UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEWYORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
V.
COINBASE, INC. and COINBASE GLOBAL, INC.
Defendants.
23 Civ. 4738 (KPF)
JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS, AND RELEASES
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") and
Defendants Coinbase, Inc. ("Coinbase") and Coinbase Global, Inc. ("CGI") (collectively, the
"Defendants") respectfully submit this joint stipulation.
WHEREAS, the Commission filed its complaint in this civil enforcement action (the
"Litigation") on June 6, 2023.
WHEREAS, on March 27, 2024, the Court entered an order on Defendants' motion for
judgment on the pleadings, in which the Court granted the motion in part and denied the motion
in part. SEC v. Coinbase Inc., et al., 726 F. Supp. 3d 260 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2024), motion to
certify appeal granted, No. 23 CIV. 4738 (KPF), 2025 WL 40782 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2025).
WHEREAS, Defendants moved to certify an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292(b) of the Court's March 27, 2024 Order and this Court granted such motion on January 7,
2025.
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2025, the Commission's Acting Chairman Mark T. Uyeda
launched a crypto task force dedicated to helping the Commission develop the regulatory
framework for crypto assets.
Case 1:23-cv-04738-KPF Document 176 Filed 02/27/25 Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, and in the exercise of its discretion and as a policy
matter, the Commission believes the dismissal of this case is appropriate.
WHEREAS, the Commission's decision to seek dismissal of this Litigation does not
necessarily reflect the Commission's position on any other case.
WHEREAS, by this stipulation, the Commission and the Defendants agree to have this
Litigation dismissed, and Defendants agree to withdraw their petition for permission to file an
appeal under 28 U.S.C. $ 1292(b) (see Coinbase, Inc. v. SEC, No. 25-145 (2d Cir.)), and to the
dismissal of any such appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE,
1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii), the Commission and the Defendants
stipulate that this Litigation be dismissed with prejudice as to the conduct alleged in the
Complaint through the date of the filing of this Stipulation, and without costs or fees to either
party.
2. Defendants withdraw their request for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. S
l 292(b) and will file with the Court ofAppeals for the Second Circuit any papers necessary to
effectuate such withdrawal and the dismissal of any such appeal.
3. Defendants, for themselves and any of their agents, attorneys, employees, or
representatives, hereby waive and release:
a. Any and all rights under the Equal Access to Justice Act, the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, or any other provision oflaw to
seek from the United States, or any agency, or any official of the United States
acting in his or her official capacity, directly or indirectly, reimbursement of
attorney's fees or other fees, expenses, or costs expended by Defendant[s] that
in any way relate to (i) the Litigation, including but not limited to investigative
steps taken prior to commencing the Litigation, (ii) the petition for interlocutory
review, and (iii) the appeal of the Litigation.
2
Case 1:23-cv-04738-KPF Document 176 Filed 02/27/25 Page 2 of 3
b. Any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action of every kind and
nature, asserted or unasserted, against the Commission and its present and
former officers or employees that arise from or in any way relate to (i) the
Litigation, including but not limited to investigative steps taken prior to
commencing the Litigation, (ii) the petition for interlocutory review, and (iii) the
appeal of the Litigation.
4. Each of the undersigned represents that they have the authority to execute this
stipulation on behalf of the party so indicated.
STIPULATED ANDAGREED:
.s.as
Acting Director
ANTONIAM. APPS
Acting Deputy Director
Enforcement Division
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
NICHOLAS C. MARGIDA
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Dated: fhra4y 27 ,2025
I
wt7KM sAVITT
KEVIN S. SCHWARTZ
SARAH K. EDDY
WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ
51 WEST 52N STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
STEVEN R. PEIKIN
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 BROAD STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10004
COUNSEL FORDEFENDANTS
COINBASE, INC. AND COINBASE,
GLOBAL, INC.
Dated: February 25 ,2025
3
Case 1:23-cv-04738-KPF Document 176 Filed 02/27/25 Page 3 of 3