SEC v. Asante K. Berko, No. 1:20-cv-01789-FB, Eastern District of New York (June 23, 2021) — Judgment
raw: C i vil Action No. 1 :2 0-cv -1789-FB-MMH
C i vil Action No. 1 :2 0-cv -1789-FB-MMH, No. 1:20-cv-01789-FB (June 23, 2021)
Asante K. Berko consented to a final judgment and a permanent injunction for violating anti-bribery provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The SEC obtained a final judgment against Asante K. Berko for violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding corrupt payments to foreign officials. Berko was ordered to pay $329,163.92, which includes $275,000 in disgorgement of alleged net profits and $54,163.92 in prejudgment interest. The defendant consented to the judgment without admitting or denying the allegations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission successfully obtained a final judgment against Asante K. Berko in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The action involved violations of Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which prohibits corruptly using interstate commerce to offer anything of value to foreign officials to secure improper business advantages. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Berko consented to a permanent injunction against future violations of these anti-bribery provisions. The court ordered Berko to pay a total of $329,163.92 to the SEC, consisting of $275,000 in disgorgement of alleged net profits and $54,163.92 in prejudgment interest. These funds are to be sent to the United States Treasury. The judgment also binds Berko's agents and employees who receive actual notice of the order.
Extracted insights
- $329K $329,163 $100K–$1M
- $275K $275,000 $100K–$1M
- $54K $54,163 $10K–$100K
- person against asante berko
- person against defendant asante berko
- person asante berko
- person defendant asante berko
- person general appearance
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- agency the securities and exchange commission
- The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint
- Defendant Asante Berko entered a general appearance
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to entry of this Final Judgment
- Defendant Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED restrains and enjoins Defendant from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Defendant Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint
- Defendant Asante Berko entered a general appearance
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to entry of this Final Judgment
- Defendant Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED restrains and enjoins Defendant from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law in this legal proceeding
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Defendant Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law in this legal proceeding
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed Complaint
- Asante Berko entered general appearance
- Asante Berko consented to Court’s jurisdiction
- Asante Berko consented to entry of Final Judgment
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact
- Asante Berko waived conclusions of law
- Asante Berko waived right to appeal
- Court ordered Defendant is permanently restrained
- Defendant is restrained from violating Section 30A
- Section 30A prohibits issuers from making use of mails
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law in this case
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Defendant Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law in this legal proceeding
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Defendant Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- any issuer is prohibited from making use of mails or interstate commerce to corruptly pay foreign officials
- any officer, director, employee or agent is prohibited from corruptly offering anything of value to foreign officials to obtain or retain business
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed Complaint
- Asante Berko entered general appearance
- Asante Berko consented to Court's jurisdiction
- Asante Berko consented to entry of Final Judgment
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Asante Berko waived right to appeal
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Defendant Asante Berko
- Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law in this legal proceeding
- Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 30A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to entry of this Final Judgment
- Defendant Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant Asante Berko consented to entry of this Final Judgment
- Defendant Asante Berko waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant Asante Berko waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
1
UNITED S TATES DIS TRICT COURT
EAS TERN DIS TRICT OF NEW YORK
S ECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMIS S ION,
Plaintiff,
v.
AS ANTE K. BERKO,
Defendant.
C i vil Action No. 1 :2 0-cv -1789-FB-MMH
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT ASANTE BERKO
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant
Asante Berko having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over
Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment
without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and
except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph IV); waived findings of fact and conclusions of
law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 30A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. §78dd-1] which prohibits any
issuer which has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15
U.S.C. §78l] or which is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15
U.S.C. §78o(d)], or for any officer, director, employee or agent of such issuer or any stockholder
thereof acting on behalf of such issuer, from making use of the ma ils or any means or
instrumentalit y of interstate commerce corruptly, or by corruptly doing any act outside the
United States, in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the
2
payment of any money, or offer, gift, promise to give, or authorization of the giving of anything
of value to:
(1) any foreign official for purposes of:
a. (i) influencing any act or decision of such foreign officia l in his or he r of f ic ia l
capacity, (ii) inducing such foreign official to do or omit to do any act in
violation of the lawful duty of such official, or (iii) securing any improper
advantage; or
b. Inducing such foreign official to use his or her influence with a foreign
government or instrumentality thereof to affect or influed any act or decision
of such government or instrumentalit y;
in order to assist such issuer in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or
directing business to, any person;
(2) any foreign politica l party or official thereof or any candidate for foreign political
officer for purposes of:
a. (i) influencing any act or decision of such party, official or candidate in its , his
or her official capacity, (ii) inducing such party, official or candidate to do or
omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such party, of f ic ia l or
candidate, or (iii) securing any improper advantage; or
b. inducing such party, of f ic ia l or candidate to use its , his or her influence with a
foreign government or instrumentalit y thereof to affect or influed any act or
decision of such government or instrumentalit y;
in order to assist such issuer in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or
directing business to, any person; or
3
(3) any person, while knowing that all or a portion of such money or thing of value
will be offered, given, or promised, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official,
to any foreign political party or official thereof, or to any candidate for foreign
political office for purposes of:
a. (i) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official, political party,
party official or candidate in its, his or her official capacity, (ii) inducing such
foreign official, political party, or candidate to do or omit to do any act in
violation of the lawful duty of such foreign official, political party, or
candidate, or (iii) securing any improper advantage; or
b. inducing such foreign official, politica l party or candidate to use its, his or her
influence with a foreign government or instrumentalit y thereof to affect or
influed any act or decision of such government or instrumentalit y;
in order to assist such issuer in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or
directing business to, any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil P rocedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable
for disgorgement of $275,000, representing alleged net profits gained as a result of the conduct
4
alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of
$54,163.92. The Court finds that sending the disgorged funds to the United States Treasury, as
ordered below, is consistent with equitable principles. Defendant shall satisfy these obligation(s)
by paying $329,163.92 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of
this Final Judgment.
Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which w ill pr ovide
detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may a ls o be made dir e c tly
from a bank account via P ay.gov through the SEC website at
http://www.sec.gov/about/off ices/ofm. htm
. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank
cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of
this Court; Berko as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to
this Final Judgment.
Defendant shall simultaneous ly transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case
identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment,
Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part
of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant
to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury.
The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment
interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to,
5
moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment.
Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 days of the entry
of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961.
III.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is
incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant
shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.
IV.
IT
IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of
exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the
allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final
Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in
connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities
laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the
Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).
V.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
Dated: ______________, 2021
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
/S/ Frederic Block
June 231
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASANTE K. BERKO,
Defendant.
Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-1789-FB-MMH
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT ASANTE BERKO
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant
Asante Berko having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over
Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment
without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and
except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph IV); waived findings of fact and conclusions of
law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 30A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. §78dd-1] which prohibits any
issuer which has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15
U.S.C. §78l] or which is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15
U.S.C. §78o(d)], or for any officer, director, employee or agent of such issuer or any stockholder
thereof acting on behalf of such issuer, from making use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce corruptly, or by corruptly doing any act outside the
United States, in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the
Case 1:20-cv-01789-FB-MMH Document 17 Filed 06/23/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 86
2
payment of any money, or offer, gift, promise to give, or authorization of the giving of anything
of value to:
(1) any foreign official for purposes of:
a. (i) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official in his or her official
capacity, (ii) inducing such foreign official to do or omit to do any act in
violation of the lawful duty of such official, or (iii) securing any improper
advantage; or
b. Inducing such foreign official to use his or her influence with a foreign
government or instrumentality thereof to affect or influed any act or decision
of such government or instrumentality;
in order to assist such issuer in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or
directing business to, any person;
(2) any foreign political party or official thereof or any candidate for foreign political
officer for purposes of:
a. (i) influencing any act or decision of such party, official or candidate in its, his
or her official capacity, (ii) inducing such party, official or candidate to do or
omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such party, official or
candidate, or (iii) securing any improper advantage; or
b. inducing such party, official or candidate to use its, his or her influence with a
foreign government or instrumentality thereof to affect or influed any act or
decision of such government or instrumentality;
in order to assist such issuer in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or
directing business to, any person; or
Case 1:20-cv-01789-FB-MMH Document 17 Filed 06/23/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 87
3
(3) any person, while knowing that all or a portion of such money or thing of value
will be offered, given, or promised, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official,
to any foreign political party or official thereof, or to any candidate for foreign
political office for purposes of:
a. (i) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official, political party,
party official or candidate in its, his or her official capacity, (ii) inducing such
foreign official, political party, or candidate to do or omit to do any act in
violation of the lawful duty of such foreign official, political party, or
candidate, or (iii) securing any improper advantage; or
b. inducing such foreign official, political party or candidate to use its, his or her
influence with a foreign government or instrumentality thereof to affect or
influed any act or decision of such government or instrumentality;
in order to assist such issuer in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or
directing business to, any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable
for disgorgement of $275,000, representing alleged net profits gained as a result of the conduct
Case 1:20-cv-01789-FB-MMH Document 17 Filed 06/23/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 88
4
alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of
$54,163.92. The Court finds that sending the disgorged funds to the United States Treasury, as
ordered below, is consistent with equitable principles. Defendant shall satisfy these obligation(s)
by paying $329,163.92 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of
this Final Judgment.
Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide
detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly
from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank
cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of
this Court; Berko as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to
this Final Judgment.
Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case
identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment,
Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part
of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant
to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury.
The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment
interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to,
Case 1:20-cv-01789-FB-MMH Document 17 Filed 06/23/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 89
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm
5
moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment.
Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 days of the entry
of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961.
III.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is
incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant
shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.
IV.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of
exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the
allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final
Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in
connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities
laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the
Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).
V.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
Dated: ______________, 2021
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
/S/ Frederic Block
June 23
Case 1:20-cv-01789-FB-MMH Document 17 Filed 06/23/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 90